magnifier661
B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2009
- Messages
- 59,328
- Likes
- 5,588
- Points
- 113
Talking about big men; what about Hakeem?! That dude was amazing!!! Didn't he get like 4 quadruple doubles?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Statistically he's better. Duncan has more rings though. That is a big qualifier for greatness for me.
Barkley didn't play defense.
I disagree
http://bkref.com/tiny/9J412
Edit:![]()
They're really similar, but I'd give the edge, on paper, to Duncan. Duncan also gets the edge with the rings. No contest.
Shaq was dominate, but id still take duncan every day. David robinson was my favorite player growing up and no way in hell is he as good as timmy d.
Hakeem? Maybe.
I disagree
http://bkref.com/tiny/9J412
Edit:![]()
They're really similar, but I'd give the edge, on paper, to Duncan. Duncan also gets the edge with the rings. No contest.
Look at Shaq's 1990-2000 season stats. Realize he had over 10 years of stats very close. 29.7 points, 13.6 rebounds, 3 blocks, 3.8 assists. He shot .574, too.
It's somewhat humorous that some are talking about Duncan and stats at the same time. He's the ultimate team guy who never cared about stats and still doesn't. He only cares about winning. He could have averaged 35 a game if he really wanted to.
Garnett played several years on the Celtics with two other hall of famers. He sacrificed stats for wins.
Garnett averaged 13+ RPG three times. Duncan never did it.
Duncan's career best APG was 3.9. Garnett averaged 4+ ten times, 5+ five times.
Duncan never averaged a steal per game. Garnett averaged 1.5+ five times.
Garnett started at SF his first few seasons. He could dribble better, pass better, defend any position better, etc.
Garnett has also played 6,000+ more minutes over his career.
He's certainly not better than Kareem or Wilt or several other of the greatest C's.
Kareem's best days were when I was an infant and so of course I've no recollection of Wilt. Even though I'm sure that Russell, Robertson, Wilt, etc were greats, I'm not going to look at stats and try to rank them with guys I've seen. If the question is what I think "NBA greatness" implies (primarily personal dominance & winning), Tim Duncan is easily one of the very best. Of all Bigs I've seen, I'd put only Hakeem higher with Shaq & Kareem on a more or less equal level.
STOMP
I hope PtldPlatypus is OK with being alone in the opinion that defense doesn't matter at all when discussion who the best power forward was.
I saw Kareem play (I remember him in college, and even as a highly touted HSer). His stats do him justice. He so dominated in college that they banned dunking. I remember Bill Walton in college dropping the ball through the basket from above when he could have dunked (but it was illegal).
The only thing is he would never stand up straight next to a tape measure. He's listed at 7'2", but they said back then he was a bit taller.
His shot was unstoppable - the sky hook. He was a threat to lead the league in scoring every year. He was a monster rebounder, and he had great hands and passing ability. Jerry West frequently said Kareem was one of the best dribbling big men he ever saw.
The bucks were an expansion team, drafted him in its second season. They won the championship in Kareem's second season.
The knock on him was that he didn't hustle all the time, like back to defend on fast breaks. I think they made a joke about it in one of the Airplane movies (he had a cameo).
I think he's arguably the 3rd best player in history, behind Wilt and Jordan. If he isn't, he's in the discussion.
I agree in that Wilt was the greatest pure player ever. I wish I could have watched him in his prime. He played with much lesser teammates than Russell until he got to the Lakers late in his career.
