Spectatohead
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2008
- Messages
- 15
- Likes
- 6
- Points
- 3
For the record, I found a pic of a couple of those Raptor's posters you quoted...
![]()
Beauty, eh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For the record, I found a pic of a couple of those Raptor's posters you quoted...
![]()
So you are saying Turkoglu is to KP as Kemp is to Whitsitt?
barfo
Nice strawman.
Did you not read the post where I explained why Hedo in Portland made more sense than Hedo in Toronto?
Basically, Portland, which won 54 games in the West last season, is MUCH closer to contending than Toronto, which won 33 games in the East last year. So, adding one piece like Hedo could instantly push the Blazers into serious title contention. Adding him to the Raptors doesn't come close to making them serious contenders this year, or any year after. If they fail to make the play-offs, or lose in the 1st round, they could lose their best player and be in the lottery for years to come - all while having a huge chunk of their cap space tied up in an over the hill Hedo - thus hampering any rebuilding effort. With a younger, more talented roster, Portland won't be in the lottery anytime soon. So, Hedo can go from starter to back-up as he declines, and Batum improves - all the while with the Blazers remaining viable title contenders.
Different team, different situations.
BNM
I don't see Hedo being that hard to package in three years.
Toronto, Ptd . . . signing Hedo to a 5 yr big contract is/was not going to be some "huge mistake" for either club.
Durant's 25 points a game is about what Oklahoma has averaged in win totals with him on the roster.
Hedo will improve the Raptors. So apparently why BC will regret this is because Hedo will tie up Toronto' salary cap space up in the future. After this summer, IMO, this whole salary cap flexiblity is overrated.
Toronto, Ptd . . . signing Hedo to a 5 yr big contract is/was not going to be some "huge mistake" for either club.
Turkoglu reminds me of a worse, taller version of Steve Smith. Nice shooter, big, good passer, decent handle for his size, forgettable (at best) defense. Smitty had a post game, but Hedo is better at feeding the post. Smith was a better scorer and rebounder.
Smitty was a nice guy and I liked him when he was here, but he was pretty much done by age 32.
Imagine paying Steve Smith the kind of money Turkoglu will be getting when he's 34. *shiver*
I don't remember the specifics, but I remember we got Derek Anderson and Steve Kerr and they got Smith.
Who would've guessed that Steve Kerr was the best value in that deal.