OT- Nuggets trade 20th pick to Bobcats

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
That's fine. If those guys pick a player the Nets wanted I'll consider it a close call.
 
Relax everyone. It's Michael Jordan who is in charge over in Charlotte.

We are TOTALLY fine.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (infinet @ Jun 25 2008, 06:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Relax everyone. It's Michael Jordan who is in charge over in Charlotte.

We are TOTALLY fine.</div>



Good point. I'm not too worried about it, really. I wouldn't worry about it. Don't worry about it. I'm not worried at all.
 
and larry brown might i add!!! jordan and larry brown... like larry brown tellin dumars in detroit not to draft carmelo and go after darko! dARKO?!?! DARKo?!?!
 
at the same time, despite the idiocy in Charlotte, aren't their needs similar?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JRon @ Jun 25 2008, 07:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>at the same time, despite the idiocy in Charlotte, aren't their needs similar?</div>

Well, they need a point guard and a big man desperately. They don't need players on the wings as much.

Luckily, we aren't as desperate at PG, and there's plenty of serviceable big men available in this draft to not worry too much.
 
9th pick Anthony Randolph
20th pick DeAndre Jordan.
haha.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Jun 25 2008, 07:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JRon @ Jun 25 2008, 07:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>at the same time, despite the idiocy in Charlotte, aren't their needs similar?</div>

Well, they need a point guard and a big man desperately. They don't need players on the wings as much.

Luckily, we aren't as desperate at PG, and there's plenty of serviceable big men available in this draft to not worry too much.
</div>

thanks pegs, check.
 
This sucks. DX is reporting that the Cats will take Hibbert with the 20th pick. Which means they wont select Lopez at 9, which means we probably will.

God, the only thing I asked for is no Lopez brothers.
 
I'm curious why people aren't liking the Lopez bros. Sure, Brook is better than Robin (at the time being) , but they are some of the most solid bigs early on in the draft.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (soul driver @ Jun 25 2008, 08:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm curious why people aren't liking the Lopez bros. Sure, Brook is better than Robin (at the time being) , but they are some of the most solid bigs early on in the draft.</div>

They're twins. They play center. They went to Stanford. Remind you of anyone?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Jun 25 2008, 07:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JRon @ Jun 25 2008, 07:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>at the same time, despite the idiocy in Charlotte, aren't their needs similar?</div>

Well, they need a point guard and a big man desperately. They don't need players on the wings as much.

Luckily, we aren't as desperate at PG, and there's plenty of serviceable big men available in this draft to not worry too much.
</div>

thanks pegs, check.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (soul driver @ Jun 25 2008, 07:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm curious why people aren't liking the Lopez bros. Sure, Brook is better than Robin (at the time being) , but they are some of the most solid bigs early on in the draft.</div>


Stiffs
 
I hope this means they don't want a big no matter what. Ford said that Memphis is interested in Gordon at 5. I don't see the Knicks, Clippers, or Bucks interested in Love, so maybe he could last to us?
 
wtf, marcus couldn't get us that pick?

Nugs need a point. Would've been good for them.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Netted @ Jun 25 2008, 10:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>wtf, marcus couldn't get us that pick?

Nugs need a point. Would've been good for them.</div>

1) No, he couldn't have gotten that pick

2) No, he wouldn't have been good for the Nuggets

3) The Nuggets are banking on MJ being MJ as a GM and the pick paying off in the future
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jun 25 2008, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Netted @ Jun 25 2008, 10:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>wtf, marcus couldn't get us that pick?

Nugs need a point. Would've been good for them.</div>

1) No, he couldn't have gotten that pick

2) No, he wouldn't have been good for the Nuggets

3) The Nuggets are banking on MJ being MJ as a GM and the pick paying off in the future
</div>
What a waste of space if he can't even get that pick.

The pick has protections so who knows how long before Denver gets to use it.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Netted @ Jun 25 2008, 10:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jun 25 2008, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Netted @ Jun 25 2008, 10:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>wtf, marcus couldn't get us that pick?

Nugs need a point. Would've been good for them.</div>

1) No, he couldn't have gotten that pick

2) No, he wouldn't have been good for the Nuggets

3) The Nuggets are banking on MJ being MJ as a GM and the pick paying off in the future
</div>
What a waste of space if he can't even get that pick.

The pick has protections so who knows how long before Denver gets to use it.
</div>

They are planning on waiting a while for it and getting a very high pick out of it.

A Marcus Williams today isn't close in value to a future MJ managed Bobcat's pick in the future
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Featured content

Back
Top