Sigh. You don't seem to understand the difference between settling a largely unpopulated country almost 400 years ago,
"Largely unpopulated"? I like that "largely". What do you think the population was, according to reliable archeological sources? Of course, it was a lot more unpopulated after the programs of mass extermination. But hey, manifest destiny, right? Clearly God
intended America to belong to us whiteys.
and breaking through internationally recognized borders today.
Oh I see - this is all about the "international community". I'm glad to see you're such a fan - no doubt when an international tribunal gets around to trying Dick Cheney and Dubya on war crimes, you'll be first in line to hand them over.
Look: I don't think it's
surprising that people already in Arizona don't want to let people in (although, I'd like to see how long that lasted if it really worked on 100% of the illegal immigrant population - who would mow all those lawns?) because they feel somehow entitled to it. But that's all it is, a feeling. There's no remotely plausible moral account that you can tell that justifies the borders of, actually any country, given its history, but particularly the US, and particularly the American Southwest. Besides which, aren't all you Republicans god-botherers? Do you really believe that God gave Arizona to the whiteys and is smiling on their selfish attempt to keep the poor people out?
But then you're no Albert Einstein.
I assume this is in retaliation for my Stephen Hawking comment. Which was motivated by his actual commentary on the plight of Native Americans (as you would know if you clicked on the link). So for your comment to have a point, presumably Einstein (not only foreign, but Jewish too!) supported your view on immigration? Somehow I doubt it. But then you're no Niels Bohr.