Out of the starters; the most valuable trading asset

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Howard and Bynum were part of a multi-team, multiple players trade and Kobe was a draft pick.

You said give up One player and get One in return. That is exactly what the Lakers did with Bynum. As for Kobe, the Hornets drafted him and traded him for Divac on draft night.
 
I prefer to approach it as "Out of Our Starters, who is the most "Possible" trade asset. Excluding 1 year contract, expiring...Hickson from the equation and I would answer Wesley Matthews.

Don't mistake this statement as in any way shape or form meaning I advocate for trading him, I do not. I think he is severely underrated. He's probably our best individual defender, and he has a warriors mentality. But it becomes pretty simple, baring a disaster The Blazers are not trading Aldridge, Batum or Lillard....by default that leaves Wesley.

There are a lot of scenario's where it could work. Move Batum to 2 guard? Replace your SF? Leave Batum at SF....find a replacement 2 guard?

If you think of it as a "JENGA" tower, and you are forced to remove one piece from the base? Wesley arguably is the piece you could possibly remove without destroying everything. It would depend entirely on what you were getting for him, and what you believe you may already have.

That being said, while Aldridge, Batum and Lillard get much of the spotlight, Wesley just quietly does the right thing. Defends, scores and hit's the big shots. His commentary makes me believe he is a good type of person to have in the locker room. Unless the gain was undeniable? I certainly wouldn't sacrifice Wesley.

The Blazers are in the slow, somewhat arduous stage of rebuilding their depth and asset base. Right now, The Blazers simply do not have the depth to make a major trade, unless you want to digress this rebuild, to a total ground up rebuild, which I do not believe The Blazers want to do.
 
Wes, like Hickson, would make for a very good bench. The trick with Hickson is finding a way to obtain a true defensive center while retaining him, and while not overpaying him. That doesn't seem likely. His contract makes it hard to get value for him atm. I agree with unclewiffy that Wes is the most tradeable 'productive' player we have that is also replaceable, but unless we get an upgrade, don't trade him either. I agree we seem to be in the collect assets phase that precludes a meaningful trade. That leaves the draft and free-agency as the most likely ways to upgrade our team -- even though many argue both of those are unlikely, they are still the most likely. As for trades, I'd trade Hickson and Wes for that elusive defensive center (i.e. Hibbert) and worry about filling the wing position later.
 
Unclewiffy welcome to s2! Glad you decided to stop by man! I like your definition btw. Makes a lot of sense.
 
WTF? Eric, step away from the keyboard and seek help immediately

wes mathews has the 11th highest WS so far this season for a SG, and thats with missing 6 games or whatever

it might not be correct but it certainly isnt wtf worthy
 
wes mathews has the 11th highest WS so far this season for a SG, and thats with missing 6 games or whatever

it might not be correct but it certainly isnt wtf worthy

Maybe not, but he is rated 22nd overall SG in PER, (13.0 for SG) while his opponents SG PER is 14.6. 22nd pretty far away from Top 15
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top