OVER/UNDER on Wallace.........

[THE HCP]

Wondering how many games it takes for people on here to start blaming Wallace for our losing streak!

 

[Nikolokolus]

0 ... if we lose tonight people will blame the loss on his absence.

 

[Eastoff]

how quickly we moved passed playing Roy.

 

[mgb]

Wondering how many games it takes for people on here to start blaming Wallace for our losing streak!

What losing streak?!?

 

[BBert]

Wondering how many games it takes for people on here to start blaming Wallace for our losing streak!

Losing streak? Whatchu talkin' 'bout Willis?

 

[THE HCP]

BUMP!

 

[HailBlazers]

Wish G.Wallace would have shot more! The Blazers were BROKE tonight

 

[yenniedn]

We obviously should've gotten Crawford at the deadline - he's clearly better than Wallace and we would've won tonight. This organization never gets it right.










Sincerely,
Mixum

 

[Wheels]

can we all have "Signed, Mixum" or something to that extent in our sig?

 

[ebott]

If such a thing comes to pass it will show that a lot of people are reading the box score rather than watching the game.

 

[Rhal]

It seems like Batum is the new go to scapegoat.

 

[mook]

It seems like Batum is the new go to scapegoat.

If you're referring to my thread, well...I suppose you could look at it that way. That wasn't my intent, though. I don't think Batum played so egregiously that he HAS to be benched. I just think Wallace is so good that he has to start, and that means somebody has to sit. Of our current starters Batum is the weakest link.

 

[Rhal]

If you're referring to my thread, well...I suppose you could look at it that way. That wasn't my intent, though. I don't think Batum played so egregiously that he HAS to be benched. I just think Wallace is so good that he has to start, and that means somebody has to sit. Of our current starters Batum is the weakest link.

Nah was suffering to everyone getting really really mad at Batum last night in the game thread for his defense on Crawford.