Parsons vs Layman

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Defensively he will get found out a lot in the league at first, I imagine, but offensively he's got the tools to do well. Good shooter, good handles, can dunk, also got size. For a second round pick he might actually turn out quite decent. We got him from Orlando basically so he will probably turn out a steal.

Layman is who they want Hezonja to be.
 
ct-mike-dunleavy-happy-after-return-spt-0208-20160207
 
Did you watch Parsons at Florida? He was a Point Forward and had the ball a lot as a primary playmaker on that team. I fully agree I wouldnt have expected Parsons to be what he is now, but his progression makes sense. Everyone knew he could create and be dynamic, but his shooting was a big question and his ability to score.
It's a bit late to talk about his play in college. This is his 6th year in the league, what he did in college is a moot point now.
 
It's interesting how similar Jake Layman and Chandler Parsons are. Both were taken in the 2nd round, both played a full 4 years, same size and very similar athletically (good athletes for their size), Layman's veritical is actually 8 inches higher though, and so is his penis.


Neither lit up the scoreboard in college, Layman averaged 11.6 ppg and Chandler 11.3 as a senior, but they were both very efficient. Layman shot 61/40/83 as a senior, and Parsons 54/37/56.
You had me at penis
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top