Boob-No-More
Why you no hire big man coach?
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2008
- Messages
- 19,094
- Likes
- 22,764
- Points
- 113
But if we could use Leonard and some other players for him; then we can still retain Hickson too.
Why? I happen to actually think Hickson is a better player than Pekovic. He's younger, more durable and better rebounder, etc. Pek is basically an older, slower, more expensive version of Hickson. He's just as bad defensively and a worse rebounder.
Like I said, I'd rather pay Hickson what it takes to keep him and develop Leonard. Would you really give up the 20-year 7'1" freak athlete for the slow, plodding injury prone over priced 27 year old Pekovic? The Blazers aren't in win now mode. Why blow your entire cap space load on a stop gap like Pekovic AND mortgage your future by giving up on your 7'1" 20-year old lottery pick half way through his rookie season? Seems incredibly short sighted and won't get us any closer to a championship, either short term or long term.
In short, Pek isn't the answer. Giving him a near max deal would be bad enough. Giving up a valuable asset in the process would be even worse.
BNM
