PFF's statement in sig

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
O

Opal

Active Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
6,026
Likes
1
Points
38
Re: PFF's statement in sig

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>98% of the teenage population does or has tried smoking pot. If you're one of the 2% who hasn't, copy & paste this into your signature.</div>No way that is true, that is the hugest BS ever. Everyone else agree?
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Camby23Land @ Feb 10 2007, 05:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No way that is true, that is the hugest BS ever. Everyone else agree?</div>I agree.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

not sure but I never have tried it. It could be true most people I know have tried it. :dunno:
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

Ya I think it's more than 2% that is way too low. None of my friends have tried it.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Camby23Land @ Feb 10 2007, 04:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No way that is true, that is the hugest BS ever. Everyone else agree?</div>Obviously.I have seen the same quote with different stuff put in instead of marijuana, whether it's alcohol, having sex, eating your own diarrhea, or having the guts to touch Something-To-Say. Of course, the numbers would be off on all of those.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

I'm not to sure. A lot of my friends do it except my friends who are into basketball.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

I have a few friends (being in the neighbourhood I live in) that have tried it, but I dont think only 2% of teens haven't tried it.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

never have before. but I do believe that it is up there though, not in the 90s but probably close to 70%+
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

That's BS. 2% who hasn't done it..?Anyway I haven't done it, some of my friends do though. Half of the people in my neighbourhood has probably done it.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

It's supposed to be 2% stand up for God or something like that...It's horse sh*t though. [Both of them]
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

<span style="font-size:18pt;line-height:100%">Guy's I didn't create that sig. Some other member on this site (I forget his name) has that on his sig so I copied it and put it on mine because I've never done or pot.</span>
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CRaZy_KiCkz @ Feb 10 2007, 03:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>never have before. but I do believe that it is up there though, not in the 90s but probably close to 70%+</div>I'd say maybe half.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ Feb 10 2007, 04:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Guy's I didn't create that sig. Some other member on this site (I forget his name) has that on his sig so I copied it and put it on mine because I've never done or pot.</div>Yes I know I have seen it before, just decided to post it because of how much BS it is.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Camby23Land @ Feb 10 2007, 06:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'd say maybe half.Yes I know I have seen it before, just decided to post it because of how much BS it is.</div>well you can't blame me for having it. I'm not going to check the math. I just put it in.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

Why is this fool still allowed to post here?
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (LAZY @ Feb 10 2007, 07:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Why is this fool still allowed to post here?</div>I was going to start flaming you but then I decided, wtf? why would I flame a guy who couldn't help his immaturity
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

Add Isiah.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

How did Daniels ruin your team, he sucks anyways.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

^Obviously, mine was the 2nd post. But my point is how he is ruining the team from a playing standpoint. He wasn't getting a lot of time and was not a factor. I mean you might as well as add McLeod too.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

Rok is right. The Pacers were ruined long before Marquis joined them.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

No, it's probably around 60-70%...
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CB4AllStar @ Feb 11 2007, 05:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No, it's probably around 60-70%...</div>I highly doubt it's even that high, I would be willing to bet it's around 15-20%.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

It depends. If it is 16-18 year olds than it is definately higher than 15-20%. Atleast where I live....Halifax is the drug and crime capital of Canada...
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">There's no possible way for such a percentage to exist when concerning smoking about any group, unless it states:<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>98% of potsmokers have tried to smoke. 2% have tried to smoke as well. Post this in your sig if you're that 2%.</div></span>
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CB4AllStar @ Feb 12 2007, 10:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>It depends. If it is 16-18 year olds than it is definately higher than 15-20%. Atleast where I live....Halifax is the drug and crime capital of Canada...</div>So it is equal to Montana's drug and crime rates? Just kidding I know you will go crazy. It does depend on the age group though. 13 - 15 is probably much less than 16 - 18.
 
Re: PFF's statement in sig

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Camby23Land @ Feb 13 2007, 11:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>So it is equal to Montana's drug and crime rates? Just kidding I know you will go crazy. It does depend on the age group though. 13 - 15 is probably much less than 16 - 18.</div>
rolleyes.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Featured content

Back
Top