Pinwheel1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
- Messages
- 23,342
- Likes
- 15,855
- Points
- 113
in the decade BEFORE Knight invested his first dollar in the UofO, the Ducks had been to 7 bowl games including the Rose Bowl and Cotton Bowl. That's pretty 'relevant'. Knight has been integral in Oregon's rise for sure, but he isn't the only reason for it. After Rich Brooks made Oregon occasionally relevant and competitive, Mike Bellotti built the foundation for the consistently ranked team Oregon has been except for the Helfrich burp
Exactly. Phil leveled the playing field against the "blue blood" programs that spent lots of money for the last 100 years. But as we have seen with every top program, it is the coaches that bring in the recruits. Every program has dipped when they had the wrong coach.
Helf was a great example, he coached his team in the Championship game and yet still could not recruit effectively enough to keep his job. On the flip side, you had Erickson who had very little to work with but was effective while he was in Corvallis. It always comes down to coaching, which is why they get paid a ridiculous amount of money.