UKRAINEFAN
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 14,914
- Likes
- 12,080
- Points
- 113
Ha,ha,ha,ha.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ha,ha,ha,ha.
I WOULD do a Dallas trade that brought us back Jalen Brunson. But somehow I don't think they'd be interested (unless the GM got worried that he was stealing Luka's thunder).https://www.nbaanalysis.net/2021/11...dallas-mavericks-trade-focused-cj-mccollum/2/
Offered without comment.
Big trades like this are fun to play around with but they absolutely never happen. (The closest I can think of is the one that moved around Vin Baker, Shawn Kemp and Tyrone Hill + Terrell "Pride of Portland" Brandon.)How about this one - throw in picks to Thunder, as well.
View attachment 42095
I’d hate to quit on Ant, but I’d do the tradeHow about this one - throw in picks to Thunder, as well.
View attachment 42095
How about this one - throw in picks to Thunder, as well.
View attachment 42095
Brogdon hasn't been a good defender the past couple years. That part of his game fell off when he got more responsibility.Pacers are the best bet, I think. They have stalwart defender Brogdon at one guard spot and Turner behind to clean up any defensive messes. They also have a slew of mid-size contracts for not-as-good-as-CJ scorers (LeVert, Warren, Lamb) that could be bundled with the main target: Duarte.
That said, it's probably more likely that the Pacers are happy to sit on Duarte.
CJ + Little
to New Orleans
B. Ingram
Then package Nurkic and RoCo
thats an overpay for ingram. Little is continuing to grow and show promise.
possibly. Hard to imagine with littles upside though.
Plus he cant play a full season?
View attachment 42148
That was with an old coach though. billups has noted several times he likes littles hustle and play.My problem with our "upside" guys is that we always treat them as high upside valuable guys when we discuss trades here, but our team is not actually using them more than 20 mins. And it's not that we are a top5-6 team or a legit contender. Actually we are very far from it which means those guys should find more playing time. Just lately in his third year it seems we realised maybe Little deserves to play more. And even if RoCo is a damn mess Little doesn't find that many minutes. Yet we think they are valuable as trade chips.
Chauncey said Ingram shoulda been the 1st pick in his draft class.I think we will be very active before the trade deadline and we do have assets to wheel and deal with.
This is where Chauncey will put in his order fro certain players or types of players.
thats an overpay for ingram. Little is continuing to grow and show promise.
Provided Coach plays (eventually starts) Nas THIS YEAR, I would tend to agree. But a CJ straight across for Ingram seemed a little underpaying. If we play Nas, let’s then go for a Center. I’m liking the play of Nance lately. He could very well be our starting PF, so let’s do what I’ve been asking since August:
CJ + Nurkic + 1st
For
KAT and Beverly
If the Blazers had KAT and Beverly, would you trade them for CJ & Nurkic?
I like Little way too much to part with. I’d rather deal Simons because we have enough small guards and while I like Simons I think his skill set is the most easy to duplicate in the NBA
Throw in McLemore as well (for some reason he's not listed as a Portland player in this Trade Machine) - but trade can't happen until December 15:I WOULD do a Dallas trade that brought us back Jalen Brunson. But somehow I don't think they'd be interested (unless the GM got worried that he was stealing Luka's thunder).
Oh, and Boban has to be included or no deal.
Hey, that's not fair--you have to consider fit in sizing up trades. CJ obviously doesn't fit in Portland alongside Lillard and Powell. So Portland gets the big man and Minnesota gets the scoring guard to go along with *checks* Anthony Edwards and DeAngelo Russell...........
I like that second one.Throw in McLemore as well (for some reason he's not listed as a Portland player in this Trade Machine) - but trade can't happen until December 15:
View attachment 42169
Don't like Timmy Jr - he's just there to make the salaries match. Maybe try to flip him to Indiana as Carlisle is the only coach who can make him look useful:
View attachment 42170
(Dennis Smith Jr is a placeholder for McLemore, but as we're getting Brunson, I wouldn't mind throwing him in instead/as well.)
Throw in McLemore as well (for some reason he's not listed as a Portland player in this Trade Machine) - but trade can't happen until December 15:
View attachment 42169
Don't like Timmy Jr - he's just there to make the salaries match. Maybe try to flip him to Indiana as Carlisle is the only coach who can make him look useful:
View attachment 42170
(Dennis Smith Jr is a placeholder for McLemore, but as we're getting Brunson, I wouldn't mind throwing him in instead/as well.)
I agree. I've coveted Brunson for some time (i.e., since before we didn't draft him). But I'm seeing some Mavs-fans-produced trade scenarios for CJ which suggests that Dallas is one of the few teams that might actually want CJ, and I'm just saying "here's what you need to give up to get him".both of those trades have Dallas including Brunson in a trade for CJ:
View attachment 42172
I just don't see why the Mavs would agree to that. The only notable thing CJ does better is hit three's. And Brunson isn't a ball-stopper like CJ; he's a much better ball-mover & play-maker