KingSpeed
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2008
- Messages
- 63,334
- Likes
- 22,512
- Points
- 113
I liked Schroeder in Game 1 for sure. 0/7 from three.Another thing I really Love Shrouder as a backup PG. He is so much better than Evan Turner it’s not even close
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I liked Schroeder in Game 1 for sure. 0/7 from three.Another thing I really Love Shrouder as a backup PG. He is so much better than Evan Turner it’s not even close
I liked Schroeder in Game 1 for sure. 0/7 from three.
he looked exhaustedHow do you guys feel about sitting Dame to start the 4th? Seemed like he never got his groove back. I get giving him a rest, but I think unless Dame asks out you should ride him until they stop it.
im convinced you're cluelessAnother thing I really Love Shrouder as a backup PG. He is so much better than Evan Turner it’s not even close
Fine with it in context of the series. Don't think a gassed Dame at the end of the game would have given us a better chance to win tonight, and there is one more on the road he'll likely need to go 36+ on.How do you guys feel about sitting Dame to start the 4th? Seemed like he never got his groove back. I get giving him a rest, but I think unless Dame asks out you should ride him until they stop it.
I wasnt really sure if he looked tired. I thought he looked good.he looked exhausted
Didnt like it. You keep playing him. If his production wanes because hes tired, then you sit him for 2-3 minutes MAX, or call a timeout. It's the playoffs...How do you guys feel about sitting Dame to start the 4th? Seemed like he never got his groove back. I get giving him a rest, but I think unless Dame asks out you should ride him until they stop it.
Hes still not good. Inefficient player who needs the ball, and cant defend.Another thing I really Love Shrouder as a backup PG. He is so much better than Evan Turner it’s not even close
Yes!!Didnt like it. You keep playing him. If his production wanes because hes tired, then you sit him for 2-3 minutes MAX, or call a timeout. It's the playoffs...
Why would I make that bet? I want us to win in 5. I just think it is "likely" going 7. We'll see. You can come over whenever you want.
To me they kind figure out OKC in the 2nd half and I believe we have better 1st half Sunday to me I a predicting a win and we go home 3-1.
put the shirt on and look unified in color. If i had a beef with fans is they don't put the damn shirt on!!!Do what clap alot?
Honestly feel like we'll lose in 6. OKC adjusted well, and I don't trust Stotts to do the same. Hopefully Im wrong.
Didn't he fuck his teammate's wife? Hibbert? Who promptly went into a tailspin?
"Do you remember when Lance Stephenson and Evan Turner got into that fight? It was all over Roy Hibbert and Paul George. Lance has been getting all the blame for the Pacers off nights and during that day at practice Lance says 'y'all need to look at Roy's ass, he's been off ever since he found out PG was fucking his bitch.' That's when Evan got mad at him for exposing that in front of everybody and that sparked the fight."


No. Dame might think he can do it but the eye test says he needs to get off the court. At least for a short break.How do you guys feel about sitting Dame to start the 4th? Seemed like he never got his groove back. I get giving him a rest, but I think unless Dame asks out you should ride him until they stop it.
Yep a short break would not hurt but giving him a few more probably would make sense. Did you happen to notice if Stotts left a time out on the board? I'm betting he did. Probably more so because it wasn't close enough at the end to use it but that would just make the point. Being in a very close game with no time outs is better than being in a game out of reach with two on the board right?Didnt like it. You keep playing him. If his production wanes because hes tired, then you sit him for 2-3 minutes MAX, or call a timeout. It's the playoffs...
Lets just put it this way - If burning a timeout helps Dame play an extra 2 minutes in the 4th, I'd do it.Yep a short break would not hurt but giving him a few more probably would make sense. Did you happen to notice if Stotts left a time out on the board? I'm betting he did. Probably more so because it wasn't close enough at the end to use it but that would just make the point. Being in a very close game with no time outs is better than being in a game out of reach with two on the board right?
Yep a short break would not hurt but giving him a few more probably would make sense. Did you happen to notice if Stotts left a time out on the board? I'm betting he did. Probably more so because it wasn't close enough at the end to use it but that would just make the point. Being in a very close game with no time outs is better than being in a game out of reach with two on the board right?
Lets just put it this way - If burning a timeout helps Dame play an extra 2 minutes in the 4th, I'd do it.
Seems the narrative is Timeouts are purely to stem the run of the opponent or to do playmaking/defensive adjustments.
Why cant timeouts simply be used for the guys on the court to take a breath and regroup?
I totally agree with you guys.
I can actually see both arguments. When I posted the question I was kind of mulling over how I felt about it.Seems the narrative is Timeouts are purely to stem the run of the opponent or to do playmaking/defensive adjustments.
Why cant timeouts simply be used for the guys on the court to take a breath and regroup?
I totally agree with you guys.
That's the problem; he usually makes the shot and the NBA has this thing where they don't like to call a foul on a made shot unless you really gt clobbered.I think there’s a difference between taking it to the hoop (like Dame did) and taking it at the hoop and running into the defender and getting the call every time (like George does). Dame got bodied so much and they never called it. He’s just amazing at taking the contact and still making the shot.
I think we get the next 2games.I like you're thinking. I think it'll go 7 but we'll see.
Also no one should be surprised we lost last night, ESPN told the world we were losing one of these road games when they announced the upcoming schedule. They had times set for the first FIVE games and never once said “if necessary”, you think the networks make more money on sweeps? Lol
