Podesta emails.

[Denny Crane]

I will note that the campaign's response to that email was along the lines of "yes, we can share her position on the death penalty with you". Not "hey, thanks for the hot tip!".

barfo

And Brazille was working for the media and improperly shared the debate questions with the campaign. Bernie Sanders got fucked, just as we all will. The liar knows no ethical or legal boundaries.

 

[Denny Crane]

Hey Denny -- here's some fact checking

Clicked on the first picture. A tweet saying it's a Braniff 1st class seat. The plane in the photo is a DC-10. Braniff (as near as I can tell) flew Boeing planes and the DC-8 (not DC-10) at the time. Boeing planes, only, in the USA.

The third photo is of a BAC1-11 plane.

I'm sure CNN's aviation editor knows better.

 

[Denny Crane]

You figured that out on your own by seeing Katrina say it? My, that's impressive.

Here's a tip: Katrina Pierson is an idiot.



Actually, there are plenty of other ways to say it.

barfo

You're 100% wrong, good job!

That's not my impression, it's fact.

 

[barfo]

And Brazille was working for the media and improperly shared the debate questions with the campaign. Bernie Sanders got fucked, just as we all will. The liar knows no ethical or legal boundaries.

Actually, today's news makes it clearer that the question that Brazille sent did in fact come from the debate moderator. Which is very interesting, and does suggest something smelly.

It's not entirely clear yet, though, exactly who did what when, and who knew what when. Unless the campaign knew it was going to be hacked, and was cleverly preparing for that, it seems like maybe they didn't think they were receiving a debate question but rather a request for information.

barfo

 

[Nikolokolus]

This is how I sum up Trump and Clinton. They're both dangerous candidates in their own ways:

With Clinton it will be more of the same hawkish foreign policy, the same DOJ prosecuting journalists for not revealing their sources and hounding whistle blowers, the same corrupt money-machine in Washington, and with an adversarial congress not a fucking thing will get done and she might even get impeached or assassinated, but whatever the case I really see her as a one-hit wonder.

With Trump, he's a toxic mix of run-amok belligerence and anti-intellectualism and holds some truly dangerous views about how a constitutional democracy is supposed to work. I don't know that he'd be able to go full Mussolini, but the rhetoric is eerily similar to the 1920s and 1930s that gave rise to fascism across Europe. He might also get impeached or assassinated, but I think electing him could normalize some truly anti-democratic impulses in our country.

I'm still going to vote for Gary Johnson despite the fact that he deeply disappoints me in terms of his grasp of geography and geopolitics. I'm afforded the luxury to lodge my protest vote because there is no way Oregon is going to vote for Trump, but if it were then I strongly suspect I'd have to vote for a slimy shit-bag like Hillary over a potentially destructive demagogue with delusions of grandeur like Trump.

TLDR "We fucked."

 

[kingslayer]

 

[blue32]

Emails reveal Clinton camp’s scramble to craft, defend server story
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-s-scramble-to-craft-defend-server-story.html

 

[riverman]

I think Denny just fired an intern for screwing up the armrest defense for Trump........

 

[MARIS61]

For a guy who says he's not voting for Donald, or supporting him, you sure do defend him a lot.

Btw, Donald is losing because of Donald, no one else.

paid for by @SlyPokerDog

Latest Rasmussen poll shows Trump up by 7% over The Liar.

 

[barfo]

Emails reveal Clinton camp’s scramble to craft, defend server story
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-s-scramble-to-craft-defend-server-story.html

Isn't that sort of obvious? I mean, I don't need Podesta's emails to tell me that.

barfo

 

[barfo]

Latest Rasmussen poll shows Trump up by 7% over The Liar.

Yes, the angry white man vote has been severely undercounted. And Democrats are so depressed that they won't vote. If you unskew the polls, you'll realize that women's views aren't actually relevant, because they just vote the way their husbands tell them to. So it's Trump in a landslide!

barfo

 

[e_blazer]

This is how I sum up Trump and Clinton. They're both dangerous candidates in their own ways:

With Clinton it will be more of the same hawkish foreign policy, the same DOJ prosecuting journalists for not revealing their sources and hounding whistle blowers, the same corrupt money-machine in Washington, and with an adversarial congress not a fucking thing will get done and she might even get impeached or assassinated, but whatever the case I really see her as a one-hit wonder.

With Trump, he's toxic mix of run-amok belligerence and anti-intellectualism and holds some truly dangerous views about how a constitutional democracy is supposed to work. I don't know that he'd be able to go full Mussolini, but the rhetoric is eerily similar to the 1920s and 1930s that gave rise to fascism across Europe. He might also get impeached or assassinated, but I think electing him could normalize some truly anti-democratic impulses in our country.

I'm still going to vote for Gary Johnson despite the fact that he deeply disappoints me in terms of his grasp of geography and geopolitics. I'm afforded the luxury to lodge my protest vote because there is no way Oregon is going to vote for Trump, but if it were then I strongly suspect I'd have to vote for a slimy shit-bag like Hillary over a potentially destructive demagogue with delusions of grandeur like Trump.

TLDR "We fucked."

Pretty much my thought process on this two-piles-of-crap election. Johnson has zero chance, but he's the only vote I can make and not feel dirty. Like you said, the fact that Oregon is knee-deep in Donkeys makes it so I don't really have to worry about my vote having any impact on the outcome of the election. I'm grateful for this because I would really detest having to vote for Hillary. Women everywhere should be embarrassed that someone as oily as her is going to be the first female president.

 

[Sedatedfork]

And Brazille was working for the media and improperly shared the debate questions with the campaign. Bernie Sanders got fucked, just as we all will. The liar knows no ethical or legal boundaries.

I agree that seems wholly inappropriate. Frankly, everything coming out about Trump and Clinton doesn't really surprise me. I guess though if I am Clinton's campaign, what were they supposed to do about that email?

 

[Denny Crane]

Actually, today's news makes it clearer that the question that Brazille sent did in fact come from the debate moderator. Which is very interesting, and does suggest something smelly.

It's not entirely clear yet, though, exactly who did what when, and who knew what when. Unless the campaign knew it was going to be hacked, and was cleverly preparing for that, it seems like maybe they didn't think they were receiving a debate question but rather a request for information.

barfo

There you go.

Right, finally.

Though it's clear Brazille unethically gave the exact worded question that was to be asked to the campaign. If the questions were given to both campaigns, pre rules, then it would have been OK.

 

[Denny Crane]

Already answered this.

Braniff didn't fly the planes in the pictures. They flew Boeing planes, which did not have armrests that went up/down in 1st class.

 

[Denny Crane]

I agree that seems wholly inappropriate. Frankly, everything coming out about Trump and Clinton doesn't really surprise me. I guess though if I am Clinton's campaign, what were they supposed to do about that email?

What we don't know is what went on via phone calls.

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/new-york-times-gave-hillary-veto/

Danielle Rhoades Ha, vice president of communications for the Times, defended the arrangement. “We were transparent with our readers and disclosed the arrangement in the story,” she wrote in an email.

In the 42nd paragraph of the 54-paragraph story, Leibochich explained the deal: “In early July, after much back and forth with the campaign and reluctance on my part, I decided to take the campaign up on its offer of an off-the-record conversation with Clinton. I figured I would use the opportunity at Bretton Woods to ask Clinton directly for an interview or at least to let me do part of our conversation on the record. She chose the latter.”

But the disclosure did not exactly specify Clinton and her team would be allowed to determine, retroactively, which parts of the conversation were on or off the record.

Leibovich emailed campaign Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri on July 7, 2015, to try to lobby for a batch of quotes.
​

I'm pretty sure they don't offer Trump the same courtesy.

 

[blue32]

Isn't that sort of obvious? I mean, I don't need Podesta's emails to tell me that.

barfo

 

[Denny Crane]

The gift that keeps giving.

These emails do indicate a cover up. And Obama lied about not knowing about the illegal server.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/26/us/politics/wikileaks-hillary-clinton-emails.html?_r=0

 

[Denny Crane]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7011



...

 

[barfo]

My god! Hillary's email use looks bad??? This is the first I've heard of that! Thank god for Wikileaks!

barfo

 

[Denny Crane]

My god! Hillary's email use looks bad??? This is the first I've heard of that! Thank god for Wikileaks!

barfo

Acting above the law. Sanctions. Fired.


CRIMINAL.

DISQUALIFIED.

 

[barfo]

Acting above the law. Sanctions. Fired.


CRIMINAL.

DISQUALIFIED.

'smacks of' does not mean 'is'.

Someone writing an opinion in an email doesn't prove a crime was committed.

Typing something in capital letters doesn't make it true.

Your hate doesn't hurt anyone but you.

barfo

 

[Denny Crane]

'smacks of' does not mean 'is'.

Someone writing an opinion in an email doesn't prove a crime was committed.

Typing something in capital letters doesn't make it true.

Your hate doesn't hurt anyone but you.

barfo

Smacks of means "IS"

It doesn't depend on what the meaning if "IS" is.

 

[barfo]

Smacks of means "IS"

Your post smacks of a lack of understanding of idiomatic English.

barfo

 

[blue32]

Your post smacks of a lack a of understanding of idiomatic English.

barfo

BarfoLand

 

[Denny Crane]

Your post smacks of understanding of idiomatic English.

barfo

Why, thank you.

Hiliar's own lawyers using the Duck Test.

 

[Denny Crane]

WikiLeaks. Leaked email where the campaign discusses Bill Clinton.

 

[blue32]

LOL, this is quite funny:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...in-dark-shocked-over-insane-server-setup.html

 

[Denny Crane]

 

[Denny Crane]

http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/

1. Obama lied: he knew about Hillary’s secret server and wrote to her
using a pseudonym, cover-up happened (intent to destroy evidence)
2. Hillary Clinton dreams of completely “open trade and open borders”
3. Hillary Clinton took money from and supported nations that she
KNEW funded ISIS and terrorists
4. Hillary has public positions on policy and her private ones
5. Paying people to incite violence and unrest at Trump rallies
6. Hillary's campaign wants "unaware" and "compliant" citizens
7. Top Hillary aides mock Catholics for their faith
8. Hillary deleted her incriminating emails. State covered it up. Asked
about using White House executive privilege to hide from Congress.
9. Bribery: King of Morocco gives Clinton Foundation $12 million
to have meeting with Hillary, 6 months later Morocco gets weapons
10. Latinos are "needy". Latino outreach is "taco bowl engagement"

(90 more at the link, along with links to the wikileaks emails that support the 100 claims)