Exclusive Poll: What would your preferred United States firearm policy be?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

What do you think should be legal regarding firearm ownership?

  • No limitations on purchasing firearms

  • All firearms allowed except military-only weapons (automatic weapons, explosives, etc)

  • Military-only weapons and large magazines (say, greater than 12) prohibited

  • Automatic weapons and all semi-automatic rifles (eg, AR-15) prohibited (semi-auto handguns OK)

  • All automatic and semi-automatic firearms prohibited

  • Auto, semi-auto, and handguns prohibited (only manually rechambered rifles/shotguns allowed)

  • All firearms outlawed except for military, police, and authorized armed security only

  • Firearms for military only


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone that wants all guns outlawed, care to explain how that’s going to keep illegal guns out of criminals hands?

You know, the same way we keep meth and heroin off our streets.
 
I chose "no limitations" because there wasn't an option to allow the purchase of certain weapons with extra paperwork and approval. Currently, you can buy a machine gun if you go through all the proper channels. It can't be a new machine gun, it has to be one made before the ban, but you can still buy one if you're willing to spend a buttload of cash.

Also, just so people are aware, this is a semi-auto rifle:

c292d948046509c91ddf0cdbe6a9cacc.jpg


I have one. My dad has one that originally belonged to my late grandfather. If you ban all semi-auto rifles, this would be an illegal firearm.

This is also a semi-auto rifle:

1200px-M1_Garand_rifle_-_USA_-_30-06_-_Arm%C3%A9museum.jpg


This and many like it were carried on the beaches of Normandy. This is an assault rifle. It would be banned if you outlawed semi-auto rifles. Also, this is one of the few guns that actually uses a "clip."

The M-1 Garand! You have to squeeze the trigger for each shot. The worst problem we had with them was the M-1 thumb after you loaded the clip and released the bolt. That really hurt. After a long march the weight of that strap digging into your shoulder was painful. It was no pop gun like Stoner's M-16. We trained on WW 2 carbines, AR-14, AR-16 and the .45 ACP.
 
Why do liberals distrust law enforcement in one argument, and then willingly give up their means to protect themselves in another?

What is really mind boggling about this, is that law enforcement has no commitment to protect the individual. At anytime, forget about all the time.
 
Last edited:
Why do liberals distrust law enforcement in one argument, and then willingly give up their means to protect themselves in another?
If we didn’t have guns, the cops wouldn’t feel threatened, so then we would never have anything to worry about.
 
C'mon man, you're better than this. I don't want to have to keep editing...

His blatant racism gets a pass tho...

My "boys in the hood"....

Beside the fact that there is no "hood" anymore because of gentrification, my best friend lives in Tigard, is darker than me, and got his tire changed by a police officer the other day.

MF only said that because I'm black and he shouldn't get to keep alt righting me... Fuck that. I'm tired of his shit.
 
An imaginary war with a government that spies on you and gathers data about you through everything. Right, nothing to look at here

One that you support every time an unarmed black man is shot.
 
His blatant racism gets a pass tho...

My "boys in the hood"....

Beside the fact that there is no "hood" anymore because of gentrification, my best friend lives in Tigard, is darker than me, and got his tire changed by a police officer the other day.

MF only said that because I'm black and he shouldn't get to keep alt righting me... Fuck that. I'm tired of his shit.
I don't disagree. To me, it was pretty blatant. I cringed reading it. I understand why it upset you and generated the response it did. But it wasn't a rules violation, so there wasn't really anything I could do about it.

I can't stop people from being...the kind of person that they are. However deplorable that kind of person may be. But I get it...at least as much as I am able to get it.
 
Why do liberals distrust law enforcement in one argument, and then willingly give up their means to protect themselves in another?

Talking to my friends, they don't see the need to carry a weapon to feel protected.
I have a license to conceal and carry. But having a weapon and knowing how to use it isn't the reason why I feel protected.
Oh I'm not a liberal.

What is the level of armament conservatives need to feel protected?
 
Due to not being able to edit posts I'll add this.

We already say the general public can't own some weapons, because it's known they're not necessary for a public individuals defense.
So we as a society already say there is a line on the right to bare arms. That's not considered infringement of the second amendment rights.
Why is that?

I know for a fact when I'm carrying my handgun.
I would tactically be at a disadvantage if I was facing a shooter with an AR.
Does that mean I and everyone should carry an AR 24/7, 365? We don't conceal AR's.
 
His blatant racism gets a pass tho...

My "boys in the hood"....

Beside the fact that there is no "hood" anymore because of gentrification, my best friend lives in Tigard, is darker than me, and got his tire changed by a police officer the other day.

MF only said that because I'm black and he shouldn't get to keep alt righting me... Fuck that. I'm tired of his shit.
You say the most overtly racist shit on this forum buddy.

That’s why no one takes your race baiting shit seriously.
 
Due to not being able to edit posts I'll add this.

We already say the general public can't own some weapons, because it's known they're not necessary for a public individuals defense.
So we as a society already say there is a line on the right to bare arms. That's not considered infringement of the second amendment rights.
Why is that?

I know for a fact when I'm carrying my handgun.
I would tactically be at a disadvantage if I was facing a shooter with an AR.
Does that mean I and everyone should carry an AR 24/7, 365? We don't conceal AR's.
:biglaugh:
 
I don't disagree. To me, it was pretty blatant. I cringed reading it. I understand why it upset you and generated the response it did. But it wasn't a rules violation, so there wasn't really anything I could do about it.

I can't stop people from being...the kind of person that they are. However deplorable that kind of person may be. But I get it...at least as much as I am able to get it.
Oh my god you two are dramatic
 
I don't disagree. To me, it was pretty blatant. I cringed reading it. I understand why it upset you and generated the response it did. But it wasn't a rules violation, so there wasn't really anything I could do about it.

I can't stop people from being...the kind of person that they are. However deplorable that kind of person may be. But I get it...at least as much as I am able to get it.

So you're tryna tell me that's not a personal insult??? REALLY??? He certainly didn't insult my post. He said that directly to me. His racist statement wasn't even a dog whistle call. He's one of those types to call someone racist for calling out racism but then says he didn't make a racist statement when we both know how blatant it was. It's a cowardly bitch move.
 
So you're tryna tell me that's not a personal insult??? REALLY??? He certainly didn't insult my post. He said that directly to me. His racist statement wasn't even a dog whistle call. He's one of those types to call someone racist for calling out racism but then says he didn't make a racist statement when we both know how blatant it was. It's a cowardly bitch move.
Where's the insult? Suggesting that you have friends that he might classify as "boys in the hood"? Stereotypical, clearly. Racist, probably. Objectionable, obviously. Insulting--I don't think so.
 
Talking to my friends, they don't see the need to carry a weapon to feel protected.
I have a license to conceal and carry. But having a weapon and knowing how to use it isn't the reason why I feel protected.
Oh I'm not a liberal.

What is the level of armament conservatives need to feel protected?

I never said that you were.

My point wasn't about protecting ourselves from an imaginary confrontation with a burglar. My point was that people complain about the militarization of law enforcement, but they want to give up the only things that we have to defend ourselves from the government.

Do you know what serves as a huge deterrent to tyranny? A heavily armed populace. Once the guns are gone, there's nothing to stop the government from doing whatever they want, as seen recently in Venezuela and Turkey.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top