bodyman5000 and 1
Lions, Tigers, Me, Bears
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2013
- Messages
- 19,582
- Likes
- 13,216
- Points
- 113
Not really, just wondering about the "we"?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not really, just wondering about the "we"?
I chose "no limitations" because there wasn't an option to allow the purchase of certain weapons with extra paperwork and approval. Currently, you can buy a machine gun if you go through all the proper channels. It can't be a new machine gun, it has to be one made before the ban, but you can still buy one if you're willing to spend a buttload of cash.
Also, just so people are aware, this is a semi-auto rifle:
![]()
I have one. My dad has one that originally belonged to my late grandfather. If you ban all semi-auto rifles, this would be an illegal firearm.
This is also a semi-auto rifle:
![]()
This and many like it were carried on the beaches of Normandy. This is an assault rifle. It would be banned if you outlawed semi-auto rifles. Also, this is one of the few guns that actually uses a "clip."
Is there an option to ban math symbols?
Idiocracy is becoming real before my own eyes
http://www.katc.com/story/37560947/...medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark
Anyone that wants all guns outlawed, care to explain how that’s going to keep illegal guns out of criminals hands?
You know, the same way we keep meth and heroin off our streets.
Didn’t think so.I think we need more meth and heroin to
Combat the meth and heroin epidemic
Why do conservatives arm up for an imaginary war with the government but it's all "blue lives matter" when they're out here killing black folk?
Voting for the first one is insane. Like clinically insane.

Why do liberals distrust law enforcement in one argument, and then willingly give up their means to protect themselves in another?
Don’t worry everyone, the government will take care of us.
If we didn’t have guns, the cops wouldn’t feel threatened, so then we would never have anything to worry about.Why do liberals distrust law enforcement in one argument, and then willingly give up their means to protect themselves in another?
Didn’t think so.
LolHuh?
C'mon man, you're better than this. I don't want to have to keep editing...
An imaginary war with a government that spies on you and gathers data about you through everything. Right, nothing to look at here
I don't disagree. To me, it was pretty blatant. I cringed reading it. I understand why it upset you and generated the response it did. But it wasn't a rules violation, so there wasn't really anything I could do about it.His blatant racism gets a pass tho...
My "boys in the hood"....
Beside the fact that there is no "hood" anymore because of gentrification, my best friend lives in Tigard, is darker than me, and got his tire changed by a police officer the other day.
MF only said that because I'm black and he shouldn't get to keep alt righting me... Fuck that. I'm tired of his shit.
Why do liberals distrust law enforcement in one argument, and then willingly give up their means to protect themselves in another?
You say the most overtly racist shit on this forum buddy.His blatant racism gets a pass tho...
My "boys in the hood"....
Beside the fact that there is no "hood" anymore because of gentrification, my best friend lives in Tigard, is darker than me, and got his tire changed by a police officer the other day.
MF only said that because I'm black and he shouldn't get to keep alt righting me... Fuck that. I'm tired of his shit.
Due to not being able to edit posts I'll add this.
We already say the general public can't own some weapons, because it's known they're not necessary for a public individuals defense.
So we as a society already say there is a line on the right to bare arms. That's not considered infringement of the second amendment rights.
Why is that?
I know for a fact when I'm carrying my handgun.
I would tactically be at a disadvantage if I was facing a shooter with an AR.
Does that mean I and everyone should carry an AR 24/7, 365? We don't conceal AR's.

Oh my god you two are dramaticI don't disagree. To me, it was pretty blatant. I cringed reading it. I understand why it upset you and generated the response it did. But it wasn't a rules violation, so there wasn't really anything I could do about it.
I can't stop people from being...the kind of person that they are. However deplorable that kind of person may be. But I get it...at least as much as I am able to get it.
Igor the millionth time, race getting brought in by none other than youOne that you support every time an unarmed black man is shot.
Exxxxxxaaaactly.You say the most overtly racist shit on this forum buddy.
That’s why no one takes your race baiting shit seriously.
I don't disagree. To me, it was pretty blatant. I cringed reading it. I understand why it upset you and generated the response it did. But it wasn't a rules violation, so there wasn't really anything I could do about it.
I can't stop people from being...the kind of person that they are. However deplorable that kind of person may be. But I get it...at least as much as I am able to get it.
Where's the insult? Suggesting that you have friends that he might classify as "boys in the hood"? Stereotypical, clearly. Racist, probably. Objectionable, obviously. Insulting--I don't think so.So you're tryna tell me that's not a personal insult??? REALLY??? He certainly didn't insult my post. He said that directly to me. His racist statement wasn't even a dog whistle call. He's one of those types to call someone racist for calling out racism but then says he didn't make a racist statement when we both know how blatant it was. It's a cowardly bitch move.
Talking to my friends, they don't see the need to carry a weapon to feel protected.
I have a license to conceal and carry. But having a weapon and knowing how to use it isn't the reason why I feel protected.
Oh I'm not a liberal.
What is the level of armament conservatives need to feel protected?
