I haven't looked at it like that before. I can totally understand how you could think that the choice of an agnostic not to place faith in one side (atheism) or the other (theism) is an avoidance of the 'question'. I ask that you try to look at it in a different way. If humanity had to take a test and was asked "Is there a god/s" in a sense - Theism would be Yes, Atheism would be no, and Agnostic would be Other (Please explain). It's not that we are avoiding the question, we are in fact answering the question with the answer being that not enough evidence is given for to make a decision one way or the other. I can't speak for everyone, but that doesn't mean an agnostic walks through life with their eyes shut regarding the question. I am constantly weighing "evidence" for the existence of a god. I'm honestly just not sure its possible for us to gain that knowledge in this existence. Science has tried and made amazing advancements in the way we understand how things work and why they are here, but deep down my gut tells me that you could spend billions of years trying to disprove a god with science to no avail.