- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 34,409
- Likes
- 43,895
- Points
- 113
Much like Olshey and the Blazers, sometimes ya gotta switch things up.Look at that new avatar pic!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Much like Olshey and the Blazers, sometimes ya gotta switch things up.Look at that new avatar pic!
Have to admit Quick has been doing good work lately.
One thing Olshey is really good at is building relationships with agents. It's highly likely that Hood's agent told Olshey that he was going to look for better offers. If Hood's agent is telling him that the Tax-MLE wasn't going to be enough then you have to plan like Hood isn't coming back.I hope I am not sounding too cynical or something. First, I never thought that Quick would get on the Olshey bullshit train, but there he is. What a puff piece. I am happy to see that the Olshey team realized that Hood was a more valuable (and more difficult to replace I think) player to the Blazers than Kanter. What surprises me is that he didn't know either before or immediately at the deadline that Hood would sign for the 5.7. He just assumed he wouldn't. It's only because Kanter (for some crazy reason) vacillated that we have Hood and Whiteside. I think that is incontrovertible.
Listening to the Woj pod earlier this month (I think it was the one with either Zach Lowe or Brian Windhorst) and he mentioned that the Moe and Meyers for Hassan deal nearly took place 10 days before it actually happened, so I don't believe that the Whiteside trade happened just like that out of thin air as the article indicated.So, for me, the two best moves of the summer, did happen basically by accident.
This one I still don't understand. We offered him the absolute most we could offer. He knew this months ago. Was he expecting the team to clear salary to offer him the Full-MLE? I'm so glad that didn't happen.
I dont get the quick hate, but then I dont know all the history some of you have. For the last 3-4 years ive paid attention to him, he has seemed just fine.
So it's now "amateur" not to cheat?"So when Olshey last month made a FaceTime call to EnesKanter in the opening minute of free agency"
WTF??? Why in the first minute? Nobody gives a shit about the rules, so why should we respect the rules? Amateur move by Neil
"So when Olshey last month made a FaceTime call to EnesKanter in the opening minute of free agency"
WTF??? Why in the first minute? Nobody gives a shit about the rules, so why should we respect the rules? Amateur move by Neil
Have to admit Quick has been doing good work lately.

Feels like he’s chilled out on the melodramatic bullshit ever since he joined the athletic. He’s been consistently pumping out good content ever since tbh.

I really honed in on that also. Very nice to read that. Kind of seems like she isn't selling the team any time soon either.Great stuff from Quick.
By far the most interesting thing to me was the Jody Allen comment:
I like winning; I want to win.
What’s your plan? Go do your job.
Sure sounds like Olshey has carte blanche. Truly don't believe he ever had this much freedom under Paul. Big deal, IMO.
...because now he is finally getting paid real wages!![]()
Great stuff from Quick.
By far the most interesting thing to me was the Jody Allen comment:
I like winning; I want to win.
What’s your plan? Go do your job.
Sure sounds like Olshey has carte blanche. Truly don't believe he ever had this much freedom under Paul. Big deal, IMO.
Was Paul holding us back all these years by micro managing?
Nah. There's still some decent C on the market without teams. If we had a hole there, we could still get a playable player for the min.Well, to be fair, without Kanter things were looking pretty bleak. Our center rotation would have been Collins/Leonard.
I don't know if "holding back" is the right term, but he was certainly very involved as we know. Jody is like "I like winning get it done." Can't ask for a better owner than that, honestly.Was Paul holding us back all these years by micro managing?
Was Paul holding us back all these years by micro managing?
what a ridiculous notion. The money being spent now is Paul's.Was Paul holding us back all these years by micro managing?
The money being spent now is Paul's.
Nope. Paul Allen was a very accomodating owner and has spent a ton of his own money on this team.Was Paul holding us back all these years by micro managing?
micro managing and spending big, are apples and oranges people.....
One doesn't equate the other.
Paul was a SUPERB owner who spent hastily for us. It doesn't mean he curbed a bit of progress by micromanaging. Just because an owner spends doesnt mean he is spending the best or optimal way and if he was making decisions, it might not hav been the best money spent is all @Natebishop3 is saying I believe, and if so, I tend to agree.
Keep Allen Crabbe? Lots of rumors that was PA, not NO and that's a prime example of a great owner willing to spend, but micromanaging the spending so its not spent optimally.

Did they get a ring?I had a weird dream last night: Dame connected big-time with Whiteside, the team played outstanding and, well ......it was Nurk who ended up getting traded. Oh, and Whiteside re-upped with the Blzers.
Not quite sure what to make of that.![]()
I had a weird dream last night: Dame connected big-time with Whiteside, the team played outstanding and, well ......it was Nurk who ended up getting traded.
Oh, and Whiteside re-upped with the Blzers.
Not quite sure what to make of that.![]()
You went to bed stoned?
