Quik Recants

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

ABM

Happily Married In Music City, USA!
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
31,865
Likes
5,785
Points
113
Sort of... ;)

From: Jason Quick - The O

Whoa, people! Whoa!

Just got back from dinner, and boy, people must be bored tonight.

I will admit I made a huge mistake in my postseason ballot - a HUGE mistake - and I corrected it. There is no way I should have put Kevin Durant on the third team ahead of Tim Duncan. Have no idea what I was thinking. I have notified the NBA to change my ballot to reflect Duncan as third team forward in place of Durant.

Now as far as Brandon Roy on the third team behind Deron Williams ...

You all might be right. I never said it was an easy choice for me, and I never said it was the right choice.........................
 
Heh, just saw my typo. I guess I'll now have to start calling Jason, Nestle'. :lol:
 
Quick is getting more and more annoying. First of all, who the fuck cares about his ballot? And what's up with him copy pasting all the ballot, especially the parts with "You have been chosen by the National Basketball Association to serve on a committee to vote for the"... Geez, really, you're that important? On second thought, I'm glad he posted his votes, sheds further light on his stupidity.

Then he follows up with basically telling the readers that they are pathetic losers who have nothing better to do than criticize his picks? Then why the fuck did he post them?
 
Quick is getting more and more annoying. First of all, who the fuck cares about his ballot? And what's up with him copy pasting all the ballot, especially the parts with "You have been chosen by the National Basketball Association to serve on a committee to vote for the"... Geez, really, you're that important? On second thought, I'm glad he posted his votes, sheds further light on his stupidity.

Then he follows up with basically telling the readers that they are pathetic losers who have nothing better to do than criticize his picks? Then why the fuck did he post them?[/QUOTE]

So we could all bow down to his brilliance.
 
So we could all bow down to his brilliance.

Well, it backfired in this case. His vote of Deron Williams over Brandon Roy for 2nd team all-NBA reveals his stupidity and lack of knowledge of the game he's paid to cover. He's gone from beat writer to gossip columnist. Evidently, informing his readers about which player has the stinkiest farts or longest lasting erection is more suited to his talents as a writer than actually covering what goes on on the basketball court. He has supposedly been watching the Blazers all season - covering every game. How could he possibly NOT see the impact Brandon Roy's play has had on this team? Voting for Williams over Roy is a totally clueless move by someone who should, but apparently doesn't, know better.

And then asking the league for a mulligan so he could change his vote from Durant to Duncan further highlights his stupidity and unprofessionalism.

BNM
 
Why is everyone so up in arms over what Jason Quick thinks? It's not his job to be a homer; it's to be a reporter. He's entitled to his opinion. Given the way the Jazz are playing at the most important part of the season, I disagree with his choice of D. Williams over Roy, but it's not like he chose Sasha Vujacic. A legitimate case can be made for Deron.
 
Well, it backfired in this case. His vote of Deron Williams over Brandon Roy for 2nd team all-NBA reveals his stupidity and lack of knowledge of the game he's paid to cover. He's gone from beat writer to gossip columnist. Evidently, informing his readers about which player has the stinkiest farts or longest lasting erection is more suited to his talents as a writer than actually covering what goes on on the basketball court. He has supposedly been watching the Blazers all season - covering every game. How could he possibly NOT see the impact Brandon Roy's play has had on this team? Voting for Williams over Roy is a totally clueless move by someone who should, but apparently doesn't, know better.

And then asking the league for a mulligan so he could change his vote from Durant to Duncan further highlights his stupidity and unprofessionalism.

BNM

I noticed that Joe Freeman (his job too though), Geoffrey Arnold (NBA writer for the O), and even Ryan White ("Tailgate" opinion writer) have written the game articles in the Oregonian the past few weeks. Perhaps Quick has another job lined up or is about to be downsized, and perhaps knowledge of this is causing him to act like a clueless fool by first picking Williams over Roy, and then mocking the criticism of his stupid pick by asking the league for a do over on his Durant selection instead of his stupid Williams selection.
 
Why is everyone so up in arms over what Jason Quick thinks? It's not his job to be a homer; it's to be a reporter. He's entitled to his opinion. Given the way the Jazz are playing at the most important part of the season, I disagree with his choice of D. Williams over Roy, but it's not like he chose Sasha Vujacic. A legitimate case can be made for Deron.

Make that case, since Quick didn't.
 
Why is everyone so up in arms over what Jason Quick thinks? It's not his job to be a homer; it's to be a reporter. He's entitled to his opinion. Given the way the Jazz are playing at the most important part of the season, I disagree with his choice of D. Williams over Roy, but it's not like he chose Sasha Vujacic. A legitimate case can be made for Deron.

Because he's given the privilege to vote for these awards. His vote counts. If he's going to publish his votes to the world, he better be able to defend them. At least when Chuck pulled a Swirsky, he attempted to justify his vote and explained his reasons behind picking Bargnani over Roy for ROY.

If Quick makes a stupid choice, and then is dumb enough to publicize his stupidity, he deserves to be called on it. I'm still curious to hear his "logic" behind picking Williams over Roy.

BNM
 
I don't really care about awards or who he voted for. I just think his explanation is really, really....weird.

What the heck does he mean, he "never said it was the right choice"? So he may have voted for someone he knows is the wrong choice? And if he doesn't care if its the right choice or not, why bother changing the Durant pick to Duncan?

I guess from now on, whenever Quick posts something, I'll have to remember that he's never actually saying its "right".
 
A legitimate case can be made for Deron.

How???? Roy has significantly better individual stats AND he has led his team to 4 (possibly 5) more victories. Utah has underachieved. As a veteran team, their 15-26 road record is pathetic. You can try to play the injury card, but that doesn't cut it. Utah plummeted from 1st in the NW and 3rd overall seed to 3rd in the NW and 8th seed overall AFTER everyone on their roster was healthy. With a healthy roster, complete with two all-stars plus Quick's choice for 2nd team all-NBA, Utah is limping into the play-offs after losing 7 of their last 10.

The Blazers, on the other hand, a very young team, exceeded all reasonable expectations, overachieved and finished the season strong - winning 9 of their last 10. And Roy's play and leadership is the biggest reason.

BNM
 
Last edited:
Why is everyone so up in arms over what Jason Quick thinks? It's not his job to be a homer; it's to be a reporter. He's entitled to his opinion. Given the way the Jazz are playing at the most important part of the season, I disagree with his choice of D. Williams over Roy, but it's not like he chose Sasha Vujacic. A legitimate case can be made for Deron.

No. No it can't.
 
Chill the fuck out. What does being named to some mythical team matter? I never said I agreed with it, but it's not like picking one of the best PGs in the league who played most of the year without much help is unreasonable. I would have picked Roy, but Quick is entitled to his opinion. Frankly, I applaud his willingness to take shit from people who are silly enought to think this vote actually matters.

You all are free to care about meaningless awards. I'll be watching the playoffs.
 
Chill the fuck out. What does being named to some mythical team matter? I never said I agreed with it, but it's not like picking one of the best PGs in the league who played most of the year without much help is unreasonable. I would have picked Roy, but Quick is entitled to his opinion. Frankly, I applaud his willingness to take shit from people who are silly enought to think this vote actually matters.

You all are free to care about meaningless awards. I'll be watching the playoffs.

In other words, no argument can be made for this, and what Bill Simmons writes is worth responding to, but who the local beat writer votes for is not. :dunno:
 
Last edited:
Deron Williams is a great player. But he did miss 14 games this year, which isn't his fault but . . . where would Utah have finished if he'd played say, 78 games (like Roy will have this year)?
 
Deron Williams is a great player. But he did miss 14 games this year, which isn't his fault but . . . where would Utah have finished if he'd played say, 78 games (like Roy will have this year)?

I imagine Quick would have put him on the 1st team with his 19th-best PER in the league. :lol:
 
But Deron is Deron. Roy's just....yellow Mamba or something.

IMO, Roy gets dropped for letting a) Outlaw talk him into thinking that name was a good idea and b) for letting Quick publish it. I though Webster's "Baby K*be" thing made me want to hurl..."yellow mamba"? Seriously?
 
In other words, no argument can be made for this, and what Bill Simmons writes is worth responding to, but who the local beat writer votes for is not. :dunno:

Actually, I don't care to make an argument because this issue is stupid and pointless.
 
Actually, I don't care to make an argument because this issue is stupid and pointless.

Clearly it's not stupid and pointless to some posters here. I don't think your writings about the Simmons article are stupid and pointless, since you obviously took the time to construct an argument to combat what Simmons wrote.
 
I would have picked Roy, but Quick is entitled to his opinion. Frankly, I applaud his willingness to take shit from people who are silly enought to think this vote actually matters.

Here's a shot I took of Quick explaining to tlong and another Blazer fan just what went into his thinking regarding changing the picks..

114_1481.JPG
 
Clearly it's not stupid and pointless to some posters here. I don't think your writings about the Simmons article are stupid and pointless, since you obviously took the time to construct an argument to combat what Simmons wrote.

If your desire for recognition for our team is so strong, perhaps you should become a journalist so you can one day cast your own vote. I care what we do on the court. I don't care about awards given by the press.
 
If your desire for recognition for our team is so strong, perhaps you should become a journalist so you can one day cast your own vote. I care what we do on the court. I don't care about awards given by the press.

Your own comments in the Simmons thread belie this statement. :dunno:
 
Your own comments in the Simmons thread belie this statement. :dunno:

Thank you for your opinion. I believe I said in the Simmons thread that he writes what he does because he's bitter that Oden isn't a Celtic. I believe I also said that Bill's job is to bring the funny, not to bring the insight. I don't recall posting my anger over his lack of recognition of a Blazer.
 
Thank you for your opinion. I believe I said in the Simmons thread that he writes what he does because he's bitter that Oden isn't a Celtic. I believe I also said that Bill's job is to bring the funny, not to bring the insight. I don't recall posting my anger over his lack of recognition of a Blazer.

Oh, so people posting in this thread are stupid, pointless, and angry, but you posting in the Simmons thread is relevant. Thank you for your opinion; notice nobody in the Simmons thread is repeatedly calling you "stupid and pointless" for posting your thoughts on how Simmons is incorrect.
 
Oh, so people posting in this thread are stupid, pointless, and angry, but you posting in the Simmons thread is relevant. Thank you for your opinion; notice nobody in the Simmons thread is repeatedly calling you "stupid and pointless" for posting your thoughts on how Simmons is incorrect.

Panties in a wad again? Stand up. Reach down. Adjust.

You're welcome.
 
Panties in a wad again? Stand up. Reach down. Adjust.

You're welcome.

I'm totally fine. You seem to have an issue with people thinking Quick was incorrect. That's a YOU issue, isn't it? As a side note, thanks for the tip on the panties. I wore the game-day thong today and needed the adjustment.
 
Last edited:
As a side note, thanks for the tip on the panties. I wore the game-day thong today and needed the adjustment.

I'm buying these for my wife for the trip out.

50108602v5_350x350_Front.jpg
 
I'm totally fine. You seem to have an issue with people thinking Quick was incorrect. That's a YOU issue, isn't it? As a side note, thanks for the tip on the panties. I wore the thong today and needed the adjustment.

You're right. It is me. There's nothing Jason Quick can do that will make me angry. And again, I have no issue with people thinking Quick was wrong. I think he was wrong, too. Where I differ is that I believe he's entitled to is opinion.
 
You're right. It is me. There's nothing Jason Quick can do that will make me angry. And again, I have no issue with people thinking Quick was wrong. I think he was wrong, too. Where I differ is that I believe he's entitled to is opinion.


Who is saying that he isn't entitled to his opinion, although he has yet to give his opinion on why he chose Williams ahead of Roy other than to say it may not be the "right choice". Strong convictions by Quick! Way to stand behind the vote! :clap:
 
You're right. It is me. There's nothing Jason Quick can do that will make me angry. And again, I have no issue with people thinking Quick was wrong. I think he was wrong, too. Where I differ is that I believe he's entitled to is opinion.

He makes me angry! Believe that!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top