Politics #ReleaseTheMemo ?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
MarAzul said:
Well in this case we have a serious hole if the investigator keeps the case open. If what you say is true, he answers to no one.
That can not be.
Click to expand...

He answers to someone. That someone is the deputy attorney general of the USA.

barfo
 
barfo said:
because every target would use that as an excuse to impede.
Click to expand...

Naw! very few targets have the power to impede.

But you fail to acknowledge the flaw here. We can not have an investigation with no evidence and answerable to no one. That has to be corrected.
 
barfo said:
That someone is the deputy attorney general of the USA.
Click to expand...

Baloney! He and Mueller are two peas in the same pod, combined they are answerable to no one.
They have an investigation going with no evidence, and not answerable to the AG or the President. Can't be.
Can't be logically and certainly not according to the Constitution.
 
Latest development is Mueller is stalling Flynn's sentencing due to the likelihood the guilty plea will be tossed because the judge who was supposed to be random turned out to be selected by Mueller and is the same judge who issued the illegal FISA warrant.
 
MARIS61 said:
Latest development is Mueller is stalling Flynn's sentencing due to the likelihood the guilty plea will be tossed because the judge who was supposed to be random turned out to be selected by Mueller and is the same judge who issued the illegal FISA warrant.
Click to expand...

Oh my!

It's coming unraveled.
 
MARIS61 said:
Latest development is Mueller is stalling Flynn's sentencing due to the likelihood the guilty plea will be tossed because the judge who was supposed to be random turned out to be selected by Mueller and is the same judge who issued the illegal FISA warrant.
Click to expand...

Combine this with the fact that the warrant was obtained using a false report paid for with monies linked to the Clinton campaign..

If you were to propose a script like this, it would be rejected as being to ridiculous and improbable, yet here we are..
 
MarAzul said:
Naw! very few targets have the power to impede.

But you fail to acknowledge the flaw here. We can not have an investigation with no evidence and answerable to no one. That has to be corrected.
Click to expand...

There's evidence, and it is answerable to someone. Those things are true no matter how many times you insist otherwise.

barfo
 
MarAzul said:
Baloney! He and Mueller are two peas in the same pod, combined they are answerable to no one.
They have an investigation going with no evidence, and not answerable to the AG or the President. Can't be.
Can't be logically and certainly not according to the Constitution.
Click to expand...

Too bad the law disagrees with you.

barfo
 
MARIS61 said:
Latest development is Mueller is stalling Flynn's sentencing due to the likelihood the guilty plea will be tossed because the judge who was supposed to be random turned out to be selected by Mueller and is the same judge who issued the illegal FISA warrant.
Click to expand...

The law doesn't work that way. Try making stuff up that isn't obviously at odds with reality.

barfo
 
MarAzul said:
Oh!
Please link us to this law?
Click to expand...

I don't think I need to do that. If your theory of law were actually true, why is it that no one but cranks on message boards are asserting it?

Even Rep. Desperate Nunes isn't pushing your theory. And he'll grasp at almost anything.

barfo
 
barfo said:
I don't think I need to do that. If your theory of law were actually true, why is it that no one but cranks on message boards are asserting it?

Even Rep. Desperate Nunes isn't pushing your theory. And he'll grasp at almost anything.

barfo
Click to expand...

:smiley-pat:
Why didn't I think of that?
Perhaps I am the only one to have read the Constitution.
 
MarAzul said:
:smiley-pat:
Why didn't I think of that?
Perhaps I am the only one to have read the Constitution.
Click to expand...

That must be it. You are so special!

barfo
 
If the memo is released late Friday on Super Bowl weekend it's a nothing burger. If it's released Monday it's serious.
 
DaLincolnJones said:
Combine this with the fact that the warrant was obtained using a false report paid for with monies linked to the Clinton campaign..

If you were to propose a script like this, it would be rejected as being to ridiculous and improbable, yet here we are..
Click to expand...
There's always been a remnant of people who know this shit goes down. Theyve been labeled as conspiricy theorists. Just wait till you realize the moon landing was a scripted fake.
 
I'm trying to think of what kind of burger this is....

Nothing comes to mind.

barfo
 
I’m betting that on th surface this memo will look bad but deeper analysis should show that it’s a nothing burger. But by that time all those cheerleading republicans will have mad up their mind for eternity.

It’s supposed to be about Carter Page and fisa courts approving surveillance however it will be about the third or fourth time he was under the scope of the feds going back to 2013 where those he was involved with were convicted of being Russian spies.

It’s either nothing burger or could backfire.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
If the memo is released late Friday on Super Bowl weekend it's a nothing burger. If it's released Monday it's serious.
Click to expand...

When did this timing change?
A few years ago, stuff was released on Friday night so it would slide through unnoticed while the people partied.

I would expect you release just before the SB and let that suck the Oxygen out of it. No?
 
Further said:
I’m betting that on th surface this memo will look bad but deeper analysis should show that it’s a nothing burger. But by that time all those cheerleading republicans will have mad up their mind for eternity.

It’s supposed to be about Carter Page and fisa courts approving surveillance however it will be about the third or fourth time he was under the scope of the feds going back to 2013 where those he was involved with were convicted of being Russian spies.

It’s either nothing burger or could backfire.
Click to expand...


you no longer need to suppose, read it. It seems to connect all the dots.
 
I see Rod Rosenstein signed one of the Fisa request. Deep state Rosenstein!
Sally Yates too but she shed her cloak early.

Lets see, Sessions had to recuse himself, but Rosenstein doesn't?
Now Mueller only answers to Rosenstein, the only guy in that position in the Executive branch? A man that used or misused the Fisa court protections based on a bogus dossier created with Democrat money?

What a fucking swamp!
 
Last edited:
Geez!
There are at least a handful of people that need to be fired. Perhaps two handfuls. Then new rules for the Fisa process written including;
Never go to the Fisa court for permission to spy on a Presidential candidate or his people without authorization of the sitting President.
It will be assumed the President did personally authorize any such request with or without his signature.
 
MarAzul said:
Geez!
There are at least a handful of people that need to be fired. Perhaps two handfuls. Then new rules for the Fisa process written including;
Never go to the Fisa court for permission to spy on a Presidential candidate or his people without authorization of the sitting President.
It will be assumed the President did personally authorize any such request with or without his signature.
Click to expand...
I really hope for my belief in humanity that your posts on this board about Trump are strictly to troll. If some living human actually has your thought process...? :biglaugh:
 
Now the question is;

Who can fire all the friggin people that need to be fired?

Democrats would go bug shit! They want to approve the use of executive power regardless of whom is the executive.
 
Blazer Freak said:
I really hope for my belief in humanity that your posts on this board about Trump are strictly to troll. If some living human actually has your thought process...? :biglaugh:
Click to expand...

I give you my word, I only give you my honest assessments.
 
Actually this Deep State corruption did the Democrats in too. Probably caused them more harm that they did to Trump and his people.

The unintended consequences of their devious actions kept Hillary in as the Democratic candidate for President where as she should have been charged with the crimes she committed. If this had happened as it should, she would have never been the Democrat candidate. Of course it then follows that Trump may have then failed in his bid for President.
 
MarAzul said:
Actually this Deep State corruption did the Democrats in too. Probably caused them more harm that they did to Trump and his people.

The unintended consequences of their devious actions kept Hillary in as the Democratic candidate for President where as she should have been charged with the crimes she committed. If this had happened as it should, she would have never been the Democrat candidate. Of course it then follows that Trump may have then failed in his bid for President.
Click to expand...

Valid point. Bernie had a strong following and had the Dems been united, I believe that they would have pulled it off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top