Politics #ReleaseTheMemo ?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
DaLincolnJones said:
Valid point. Bernie had a strong following and had the Dems been united, I believe that they would have pulled it off.
Click to expand...

I really think you are right. I hate to think this country is ready to elect a Communist President, but there it is. He was very popular.
 
But now we are faced with fixing the problems. It has to start by firing the dirt bags in the swamp.

Will the Democrats see the light?
 
Last edited:
Read the memo...what a bunch of B.S. it started with a introductory letter that lost me from the first line, "The Honorable Devin Nunes" The letter is a bunch of whining. The memo itself is hard to take serious. It doesn't matter where the DOJ or FBI got their information as long as its true. This memo is just another attempt by Trump to undermine the invesgitation into his dirty ass. The republicans are trying to use information out of context to make it look like there is sonething where there is not.
 
Further said:
I’m betting that on th surface this memo will look bad but deeper analysis should show that it’s a nothing burger. But by that time all those cheerleading republicans will have mad up their mind for eternity.

It’s supposed to be about Carter Page and fisa courts approving surveillance however it will be about the third or fourth time he was under the scope of the feds going back to 2013 where those he was involved with were convicted of being Russian spies.

It’s either nothing burger or could backfire.
Click to expand...

Exactly it
 
#Democracylivesindankness
 
MarAzul said:
Now the question is;

Who can fire all the friggin people that need to be fired?

Democrats would go bug shit! They want to approve the use of executive power regardless of whom is the executive.
Click to expand...

Checks and Balances
 
Donald Drumpfh is now not only further obstructing the Russia investigation, he is releasing a government document and putting our national security at risk. The republicans already knee deep in his shit are following him down the rabbit hole.
 
I think it is also becoming quite clear, all this corruption and abuse of the Fisa process could not occur without the knowledge and approval of the Chief Executive.
 
MarAzul said:
This will probably be another first for Obama. He may have a full blown list of firsts, before all is known.
Click to expand...

This is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg and it crosses both party lines. We are going to see people retaining counsel and leaving their positions.
 
MarAzul said:
Nixon, the ass he was, will look like a boy scout in comparison.
Click to expand...

Whatever, your living in a fantasy world. Obama will not implicted by any of this. And I have to say pretty hypocritical of someone who believes the president has the power to do whatever he wants, as long as that president is Trump. Nixon will always be a crooked thief, a shithole stain in the presidency. That's not changing.
 
Mote said:
This is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg and it crosses both party lines. We are going to see people retaining counsel and leaving their positions.
Click to expand...

Quite possible. The next week or so should be very interesting as more and more comes out.
 
MarAzul said:
Geez!
There are at least a handful of people that need to be fired. Perhaps two handfuls. Then new rules for the Fisa process written including;
Never go to the Fisa court for permission to spy on a Presidential candidate or his people without authorization of the sitting President.
It will be assumed the President did personally authorize any such request with or without his signature.
Click to expand...

Or instead, how about if presidential candidates don't hire Russian spies? That would also solve the problem.

barfo
 
Chris Craig said:
Whatever, your living in a fantasy world. Obama will not implicated by any of this. And I have to say pretty hypocritical of someone who believes the president has the power to do whatever he wants, as long as that president is Trump. Nixon will always be a crooked thief, a shithole stain in the presidency. That's not changing.
Click to expand...

Shoot man, he was the boss! Where the buck stops!

Listed in history on many lists, like this example.
Barrack Obama, Jomo Kenyatta, Papa Doc...
 
MarAzul said:
Yes, I recognize you are claiming a check that does not exist in the Constitution.
Elections do determine the executive, the only person assigned executive power.
Click to expand...

Its in the constitution articles 1-4
 
barfo said:
Or instead, how about if presidential candidates don't hire Russian spies? That would also solve the problem.

barfo
Click to expand...

odd thing though, the only candidate that has been proven to have hired "spys" was hillery...
 
Mote said:
This is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg and it crosses both party lines. We are going to see people retaining counsel and leaving their positions.
Click to expand...

Haven't we already seen that? Everyone in the White House has lawyer-ed up, and dozens of them have left.

barfo
 
MarAzul said:
Article II
Section 1
first line;

"The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America."
Click to expand...

That doesn't mean he can do whatever he wants. His "powers" are constrained. Keep reading.
 
Last edited:
MarAzul said:
Article II
Section 1
first line;

"The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America."
Click to expand...

There are limits on executive power. I'm sorry, but it's true.

There are many countries that still have a king, and you have a boat. There's still time to live under your preferred type of government.

barfo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top