My dad suffered 3rd degree burns over most of the right side of his body when he wasn't quite two years old. He spent a large portion of the next 16 years in Shriners Hospital undergoing skin grafts. Shriners was one of the few resources available to struggling families back 80+ years ago. He went on to build a highly successful business, despite crippling (physically and socially) scarring. And despite dropping out of school early in his sophomore year of HS. He did it through hard physical work, determination, sacrifice and unbelievably long hours. But he will be the very first to tell you that he would never have made it without the charity of Shriners Hospital and his Catholic parish. It would be wonderful if society in general had true charitable instincts, but IMO, that bus has left the station. It doesn't seem to be our way anymore...if it ever was...to give consistently to those who, as Barfo said, can't do it on their own for whatever reason. And so the list of people who really do need assistance grows, as does the stresses on our society because those folks aren't getting help. In my experience, the only people who make regular/consistent charitable donations are those who have needed charity in their past, or those who are uncommonly grateful for what they have in life.
I get the sense that some of you are implying that throwing money at the problems doesn't work, so you should be able to keep your money. It's wash at best and not your problem at worst. Survival of the fittest. Those who have beat the odds without assistance have my genuine admiration. But Barfo is right. Some people just can't make it without some type of leg up. That doesn't make them weak, it makes them unfortunate. And I can't help but believe that those who think they aren't their brother's keeper are in fact the predators themselves.