Religious debate

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

I agree with most of what you wrote, except the "irrational" part. If we don't know how something was created, or how it works, or how it exists, then it isn't irrational at all to believe that God created it.

The simplest solution is usually the right one. So a super powerful, all knowing being controls everything we don't understand? And santa claus brings me my christmas presents too!:devilwink:
 
you don't see how a religion that has basically existed since the beginning of recorded history is harder to instantly dismiss as false than one started within the past 60 years by a science fiction writer?

basically existed since the beginning of recorded history? I'm happy to hear you believe in Hinduism! that is about 1000 years older than christianity. Or even judiasm! that's clearly older! Although there was still history recorded about 10k years before jesus =\ 2k is almost 12k, right?!:devilwink:
 
Ah, I see, thanks.

Does The Bible also refer to the Christian God as "He, Him, etc."?

yes, here's an example
Filling the waters with living creatures and the skies with birds, He then filled the land with living creatures . . . and then He declared that it was “good.”
 
I don't know much about scientology, but it is clear that at least some of its devotees think it adds something to their lives. You can say they are being tricked, but one could say that about any religion.



How is that any different than Scientology?

barfo
If we're talking strictly about the origins of all these religions, I'd argue that the difference is in sincerity. The older religions promised something and actually intended to live up to that promise. Scientology promises something enticing (it seems to change frequently), but never really intends to fullfill that. Instead they use lies, force, and intimidation to keep people from leaving. Those older religions all have ended up using the same tactics, but not when they first originated.
 
Last edited:
If we're talking strictly about the origins of all these religions, I'd argue that the difference is in sincerity. The older religions promised something and actually intended to live up to that promise. Scientology promises something enticing (it seems to change frequently), but never really intends to fullfill that. Instead they use lies, force, and intimidation to keep people from leaving. Those older religions all have ended up using the same tactics, but not when they first originated.

I'm not sure how you could know what pressures might or might not have been put on people two thousand years ago, or how sincere those promoting the religion were.

barfo
 
Well I know Constantine was the first Roman Emperor in 500AD to force the Population to be Christian. So 500 years is a while, but they eventually did force their beliefs.
 
It's here!
random-photos-23marchs-8.jpg
 
If you mean Christianity, it's barely pubescent in age related to most religions.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_oldest_known_religion_in_the_world
i wasn't speaking about any specific religion.

in regards to christianity, to me it seems it should be considered the same age as judaism, though i guess i could see some people disagreeing with that.

basically existed since the beginning of recorded history? I'm happy to hear you believe in Hinduism! that is about 1000 years older than christianity. Or even judiasm! that's clearly older! Although there was still history recorded about 10k years before jesus =\ 2k is almost 12k, right?!:devilwink:
i suggest you read my post again. i never spoke as to which religion is correct or that any religion is correct. i said it's harder to instantly dismiss a religion that has been in existence since recorded history than to dismiss one that started 60 or 200 years ago.

most don't really believe in the flying spaghetti monster, he's just trying to prove that you have to teach EVERY single religion if you want to teach creationism.
i know what the flying spaghetti monster is and its purpose.

There is a limit to knowing exact data for everything. This leaves free will open.
no it doesn't. that says nothing about free will. just because we don't know the exact data for everything doesn't mean that everything isn't already predetermined.
 
To each their own

People can believe whatever they want as long as they don't have the "holier than thou" mentality.

I do have a hard time taking people seriously who take a literal interpretation of the Bible. I really encourage people to read up on the historical context of both the Old and New Testament. The scripture as you know it has been assembled by various people at different dates and then translated at least two or three times.

Also check out this website detailing the similarities between the story of the Egyptian God Horus and Jesus. It's pretty crazy.
 
i wasn't speaking about any specific religion.

...


i suggest you read my post again. i never spoke as to which religion is correct or that any religion is correct. i said it's harder to instantly dismiss a religion that has been in existence since recorded history than to dismiss one that started 60 or 200 years ago.

You were replying to Barfo who said 2000 years old, and you said "a religion" which implies a specific religion... sounds like you're dancing edit: around the subject of christianity /edit

in regards to christianity, to me it seems it should be considered the same age as judaism, though i guess i could see some people disagreeing with that.

What with the whole Jesus being a jew first...:crazy:

no it doesn't. that says nothing about free will. just because we don't know the exact data for everything doesn't mean that everything isn't already predetermined.

It clearly does not say there is free will, but it is an example suggesting there is not, not free will.
 
Re: To each their own

People can believe whatever they want as long as they don't have the "holier than thou" mentality.

I do have a hard time taking people seriously who take a literal interpretation of the Bible. I really encourage people to read up on the historical context of both the Old and New Testament. The scripture as you know it has been assembled by various people at different dates and then translated at least two or three times.

Also check out this website detailing the similarities between the story of the Egyptian God Horus and Jesus. It's pretty crazy.

You don't suppose someone would take another mythology, like the Greeks, and turning it into their own, like the Romans? Or taking a ceremony like the virgin birth, see egyptians. Or something as simple as a christmas tree from pagans.:devilwink:
 
I thought this was interesting. I've decided that Oden is going to be Solar Messiah!

[video=youtube;bkXq-DNpD3Q]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkXq-DNpD3Q[/video]

[video=youtube;_8B67UFDdDk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8B67UFDdDk[/video]

[video=youtube;0PXcAlxPudE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PXcAlxPudE[/video]

If you believe in god or not these are worth watching.
 
You were replying to Barfo who said 2000 years old, and you said "a religion" which implies a specific religion... sounds like you're dancing edit: around the subject of christianity /edit
right. i said a religion. that could refer to any religion. if you'd been reading the thread, you would have seen me mention 4 religions by name that i said were much harder to dismiss than scientology or mormomism. for the purposes of this thread, it really isn't relevant that i single out one.

What with the whole Jesus being a jew first...:crazy:
i don't think it should be too difficult to figure out why i would say that.
 
The simplest solution is usually the right one. So a super powerful, all knowing being controls everything we don't understand? And santa claus brings me my christmas presents too!:devilwink:

You mean you don't understand everything? The solution is so simple. You must be simple minded.
 
Last edited:
You mean you don't understand everything? The solution is so simple. You must be simple minded.

" 'you just came here to be an ass' wait I changed my mind, and I'll join the name calling" hahaha

I was trying to make the point that, a super powerful being does not seem very rational to me. I shouldn't have been rude about making my point.
 
" 'you just came here to be an ass' wait I changed my mind, and I'll join the name calling" hahaha

I was trying to make the point that, a super powerful being does not seem very rational to me. I shouldn't have been rude about making my point.

That is fine. And to many a singularity before the Big Bang does not seem very rational. Or to some, there isn't an either/or for those types of things.
 
right. i said a religion. that could refer to any religion. if you'd been reading the thread, you would have seen me mention 4 religions by name that i said were much harder to dismiss than scientology or mormomism. for the purposes of this thread, it really isn't relevant that i single out one.

Okay, if you insist you did not mean christians, than I must have been mistake for assuming. Please forgive me for making a misconnection.

i don't think it should be too difficult to figure out why i would say that.

Are you saying that jews and christians are the same? Otherwise I think it's clear that Jews came first.
 
That is fine. And to many a singularity before the Big Bang does not seem very rational. Or to some, there isn't an either/or for those types of things.

Just because most people are dumb and don't understand something, doesn't mean it's not true. I'm pretty sure physicists don't believe there was a singularity before the big bang, rather there is nothing before the big bang. Atleast in our universe :wink: I will admit that there could be some kind of god that kick started things, the one that winds the gears and let's it go. But I have yet to see evidence of an active god, that plays a role constantly.
 
There is a limit to knowing exact data for everything. This leaves free will open.
Ok but I'm assuming you come from a scientific bent is that true? If that assumption is correct (it may not be) then please point me to some scientific data that shows evidence of Free Will. To my knowledge all the science we have shows the opposite to be true, that is to say, that everything is predestined due to physical laws. This would include this internet conversation/dialogue about Free Will or the lack thereof.
 
I personally believe in an Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent god one god and no other. It is the same god that all religions point to and it encompasses the entire manifest AND unmanifest world. It is pure conciousness the one without a second. As Einstein said:

There is no freedom of will or separate soul.

In human freedom in the philosophical sense I am definitely a disbeliever. Everybody acts not only under external compulsion but also in accordance with inner necessity. [The World as I See It]

But the scientist is possessed by the sense of universal causation. The future, to him, is every whit as necessary and determined as the past. There
is nothing divine about morality, it is a purely human affair. [The World As I See It]

Since our inner experiences consist of reproductions and combinations of sensory impressions, the concept of a soul without a body seems to me to be empty and devoid of meaning. [Letter of 5 February 1921]

I subscribe the Advaita tradition of Hinduism which to me is the same thing Jesus points to in the bible, that the Kabbalah points to in Judaisim, that the Sufi Poet Rumi writes about, that Zen Koans attempt to draw attention and what Lao Tse so masterfully described in "The Tao Te Ching".

If god is Omniscient, Omnipotent and Omnipresent as all the ancient teachings of the sages across the globe then everything is God, it is one...without a second.
 
they obviously aren't the same though judaism is part of christianity.
Uh, I'm not sure most Jews would agree with this...if you mean the Old Testament is derived from the Hebrew Torah you are correct. If you are saying Jews are Christians I think a few Rabbi's would strongly disagree.
 
they obviously aren't the same though judaism is part of christianity.

Jews Believe there is no Hell. Jews do not think Jesus Christ was God, but another messenger.

edit: i meant hell, not heaven
 
Last edited:
Ok but I'm assuming you come from a scientific bent is that true? If that assumption is correct (it may not be) then please point me to some scientific data that shows evidence of Free Will. To my knowledge all the science we have shows the opposite to be true, that is to say, that everything is predestined due to physical laws. This would include this internet conversation/dialogue about Free Will or the lack thereof.

My point is that, because things cannot be exactly known, there cannot be an exact expected outcome. We know that an electron is probably here, but that here, is very vague relative to it's size.

if you are genuinely interested, check this out:

[video=youtube;rsnEUApVHgI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsnEUApVHgI&feature=SeriesPlayList&p=095393D5B42B2266"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsnEUApVHgI&feature=SeriesPlayList&p=095393D5B42B2266[/video]

if you open the link, not just in here, it has a series of videos from a free online lecture!
 
Uh, I'm not sure most Jews would agree with this...if you mean the Old Testament is derived from the Hebrew Torah you are correct. If you are saying Jews are Christians I think a few Rabbi's would strongly disagree.
no, i'm not saying that jews are christians.

Jews Believe there is no hell. jews do not think Jesus Christ was God, but another messenger.
i'm not sure how either of those statements have to do with anything i said.
 
no, i'm not saying that jews are christians.


i'm not sure how either of those statements have to do with anything i said.

The united states is part of north america. oregon is part of the United states. Oregon is therefore part of north america.
 
READ THIS OUT LOUD "judaism is part of christianty"
yes. you can have judaism without christianity but you can't have christianity without judaism. judaism is it's own thing and jews are not christians, but at the same time christianity(in very basic terms) is judaism plus jesus.

is that better for you?
 
The united states is part of north america. oregon is part of the United states. Oregon is therefore part of north america.
awesome. that is unrelated to my statements and isn't any sort of comparison at all.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top