Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder if Ben Carson thinks he could have stopped the shootings if he was there.
starting? We're already at the point where we're numb to it and don't do a damn thing about it.
We can't do anything about guns, because reasons. We don't do anything about mental health because reasons.
But.... California has some of the toughest gun laws in the country.
They banned assault rifles. They banned high capacity magazines. Every purchase/sale has to go through a registered dealer. They have ALL the laws that gun-control advocates want.
President Barack Obama reiterated his call for more gun control reforms to make mass shootings in the U.S. "rare as opposed to normal" in the wake of a mass shooting in San Bernardino, California.
Speaking to CBS News moments after news broke of the shooting, Obama called for "common sense gun safety laws" and urged lawmakers to pass a law to prevent individuals on the "No Fly List" who are barred from boarding commercial flights from legally purchasing firearms.
The shooting happened in Paris and over 100 people were killed. France has strict gun laws, and all anyone wanted to talk about was terrorism. They wanted to talk about Islam, refugees and ISIS. Nobody talked about the guns. Nobody cared about how the terrorists got fully automatic rifles into a country with strict gun laws.
Shooting happens in California, a state with some of (if not the) most stringent gun laws in the US, and now it's all about guns. It's all about mass shootings. It's all about how we need to do something about the guns. What am I missing? Why is this a mass shooting and not a terrorist attack? Why is this STILL about gun laws? Supposedly the shooters were using AK-47's..... which are illegal in California. What's the difference here?
The shooting happened in Paris and over 100 people were killed. France has strict gun laws, and all anyone wanted to talk about was terrorism. They wanted to talk about Islam, refugees and ISIS. Nobody talked about the guns. Nobody cared about how the terrorists got fully automatic rifles into a country with strict gun laws.
Shooting happens in California, a state with some of (if not the) most stringent gun laws in the US, and now it's all about guns. It's all about mass shootings. It's all about how we need to do something about the guns. What am I missing? Why is this a mass shooting and not a terrorist attack? Why is this STILL about gun laws? Supposedly the shooters were using AK-47's..... which are illegal in California. What's the difference here?
Obviously, aspies being aspies.
It seems like they haven't released any info on the shooters yet. I'm curious what it will end up being.
Obviously, aspies being aspies.
It seems like they haven't released any info on the shooters yet. I'm curious what it will end up being.
Speculation seems to be all over the place. Maybe ISIS? I guess we will find out in due time.
1. White Militia separatist types
2. Mexicans
3. ISIS
4. False Flag
If you're going to false flag, California would be the worst state to do it in. They already have a shit ton of gun control. If anything, having these types of shootings in places like California and France only supports the argument that bad people are going to get guns one way or another.
Dispute at party may have sparked San Bernardino mass shooting that killed 14
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/...ino-active-shooter-sought-20151202-story.html
I'm guessing 0 more.
You have a plan then?
