OT Roe V Wade In Trouble (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

Protesters wrote, “Susie, please, Mainers want WHPA —–> vote yes, clean up your mess” in chalk on the sidewalk outside Collins’ Bangor home, the Daily News reports based on a police report about the incident.

Those hooligans
 
Remember, this same Supremacist court banned buffer zones outside clinics to protect patients from threats and abuse by anti woman groups. So a pregnant 12 year old has to be tough enough to have grown men scream in her face that she is a whore and murderer who will burn in eternal hell but middle aged cushy justices can't handle peaceful protest.
 
h4hHOcw.jpg
 
Yes, they say we are nothing but incubators, and we must be ladylike.
 
hehe, "forced injections".

censorship? property seizure? have you not read US history??
Yes, which doesn't mean i need to be on favor of it. And no there were no forced injections. It was a 5 dollar fine.
 
Funny how anti women try to pretend Ginsburg was on their side. Like racists pretending King was on their side.

Saying quiet part out loud. Counter protester, white male, yelled at women "not your body, not your choice, your body belongs to me".
See you leftists are so obsessed with race and gender. Everything is the oppression olympics.
 
Sure. Might as well get what everyone has to say on the record though.

I do think that is a valid point. They can't then deny it later on, when it becomes politically convenient. Which they all do.
 
You could say the same about Mollala.
I hate like hell giving you the "like", but that is actually the most truthful (and actually funny) thing you have ever posted on here. Too bad we had to endure the rest just to get here.......but yeah, my sister lives outside of Molalla. Little Alabama and then some.......
 
One important question I haven't really heard discussed is who does this leak/decision motivate in the midterms more? Dems or Repubs?
 
I hate like hell giving you the "like", but that is actually the most truthful (and actually funny) thing you have ever posted on here. Too bad we had to endure the rest just to get here.......but yeah, my sister lives outside of Molalla. Little Alabama and then some.......

I ain't so bad.
 
One important question I haven't really heard discussed is who does this leak/decision motivate in the midterms more? Dems or Repubs?

It motivates both.

It motivates Democrats who before the leak didn't really have a concrete focus, other than keeping a republican party that has become more and more extreme out of control in the Senate and Congress. The Democratic party has been to passive, mostly letting the Republican agenda of attacking black history in schools and the LGBTQ community speak for itself. Not enough. They now have a rallying cry.

The leak has energized Democratic voters who will vote in droves this fall to stop the attack on women's rights.

The Republicans are also motivated. While there may be a select few conservatives who are not totally against abortion, most on the right are including the religious conservatives and the far right which make up big swaths of voters for the political party.

The Republican agenda has drifted further right attacking racial and gender divides in our schools and across our country. Now a conservative majority supreme court has preliminarly voted down Roe V Wade. It's a conservatives dream come true and will push those who desire to see the continued destruction of liberal progress to the voting booth this fall.

It's interesting that a first assumption many would believe a liberal source leaked the ruling. But, I could equally see the right doing it. Get it out there before it's actually ruled on. Take the quick wave of sharp criticism from the left and at the same motivate your own voters. Add to an agenda that already is taking large swipes at progress and working to make America great again. Then when the ruling actually happens, it's no surprise, the reaction is not so heavy and is endurable.
 
I do think that is a valid point. They can't then deny it later on, when it becomes politically convenient. Which they all do.

Hell if they can't. That's their thing.
 
It motivates both.

It motivates Democrats who before the leak didn't really have a concrete focus, other than keeping a republican party that has become more and more extreme out of control in the Senate and Congress. The Democratic party has been to passive, mostly letting the Republican agenda of attacking black history in schools and the LGBTQ community speak for itself. Not enough. They now have a rallying cry.

The leak has energized Democratic voters who will vote in droves this fall to stop the attack on women's rights.

The Republicans are also motivated. While there may be a select few conservatives who are not totally against abortion, most on the right are including the religious conservatives and the far right which make up big swaths of voters for the political party.

The Republican agenda has drifted further right attacking racial and gender divides in our schools and across our country. Now a conservative majority supreme court has preliminarly voted down Roe V Wade. It's a conservatives dream come true and will push those who desire to see the continued destruction of liberal progress to the voting booth this fall.

It's interesting that a first assumption many would believe a liberal source leaked the ruling. But, I could equally see the right doing it. Get it out there before it's actually ruled on. Take the quick wave of sharp criticism from the left and at the same motivate your own voters. Add to an agenda that already is taking large swipes at progress and working to make America great again. Then when the ruling actually happens, it's no surprise, the reaction is not so heavy and is endurable.
Another possible right wing motivation for the leak, that I don't hear about, is to signal to state legislatures and governors to get their trigger laws passed and ready.
 
Back
Top