Do you also realize who you’re quoting? Both are a waste of time to have any serious discussions with imoI want to say they got rid
Do you not realize who you are "debating" with?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you also realize who you’re quoting? Both are a waste of time to have any serious discussions with imoI want to say they got rid
Do you not realize who you are "debating" with?
#BAM #BAMDo you also realize who you’re quoting? Both are a waste of time to have any serious discussions with imo
So pretty much exactly what I originally said.Yes due to their locker room presence, nothing to do with them on the court and then taking away from Lebron which is what we are talking about here.
Lebron was the man on the that team from day 1 regardless who he was on the court with.
Ant, Grant and Ayton are not locker room problems so difference in what we are discussing.
boozer was suppose to resign with them and gave them his word then turned around and signed with the Jazz and left the Cavs fuming.
I was told the owner didn’t see it coming!Do you also realize who you’re quoting? Both are a waste of time to have any serious discussions with imo
It's a comparison to developing young players. How sometimes having certain vets can be counterproductive to the development of said young players.how the fuck have we gone three pages about carlos boozer and lebron and what supposedly was said and or happened in 2003 in a sharpe injury thread....?
how the fuck have we gone three pages about carlos boozer and lebron and what supposedly was said and or happened in 2003 in a sharpe injury thread....?
You have no credibility if you think Boozer “wasn’t any good.” None.After he said that Darius Miles was better than LeBron. Sounds like he was really sold on LeBron's leadership...
Boozer wasn’t a “vet.” He was drafted the year before LeBron. Losing Boozer was a setback in LeBron’s career. Not a positive.It's a comparison to developing young players. How sometimes having certain vets can be counterproductive to the development of said young players.
Jesus fucking Christ. That was obviously sarcasm.You have no credibility if you think Boozer “wasn’t any good.” None.
In 2003, no one thought LeBron could play every position on the court lol.And then he left the Cavs for less money after the Cavs drafted Lebron and after Boozer had played a full season with him.
And no, I would expect a good teammate would probably say something more like "Young fella is killing it! We'd be excited to get a guy like that who can play any position on the court".
Do you expect Scoot or Sharpe to talk shit about Flagg this season? I'd personally be disappointed if they did.
*Edit* Now, this isn't to say any of these guys are bad guys. Just that you have to get guys who are on the same page if you want to build a successful team. Regardless of how good the guys you are drafting are.
Ricky Davis was a vet. So was Miles. So were other guys. Grow up.Boozer wasn’t a “vet.” He was drafted the year before LeBron. Losing Boozer was a setback in LeBron’s career. Not a positive.
He was bigger than everyone and could play point guard. It was pretty obvious.In 2003, no one thought LeBron could play every position on the court lol.
We were talking about Boozer.Ricky Davis was a vet. So was Miles. So were other guys. Grow up.
Darius Miles is only 1 year older than Boozer. I’m 50 years old and am an expert on what I speak of.Ricky Davis was a vet. So was Miles. So were other guys. Grow up.
As well as Miles and Ricky Davis and others...We were talking about Boozer.
Both Ricky Davis and Carlos Boozer were good. Obviously.Sarcasm? You said “Ricky Davis and Carlos Boozer weren't any good.” So are you now saying Ricky Davis was an All NBA player too? You can’t have it both ways. Either you meant it, in which case you’re an idiot or you were sarcastic yet still an idiot.
As well as Miles and Ricky Davis and others...
Boozer was All NBA.Both Ricky Davis and Carlos Boozer were good. Obviously.
ExactlyBoozer was All NBA.
Oh boy! Look who is dropping "Credibility" heat.You have no credibility if you think Boozer “wasn’t any good.” None.
The tipping point for me with that guy was in the Bubble he talked about how “OLD” LeBron looked and he was done. Sigh……Oh boy! Look who is dropping "Credibility" heat.
And though he has you on ignore, you remind the rest of us like once a week about it. Sigh...The tipping point for me with that guy was in the Bubble he talked about how “OLD” LeBron looked and he was done. Sigh……
Some of us wear that shit like a badge of honor!And though he has you on ignore, you remind the rest of us like once a week about it. Sigh...
Karma, baby. The Blazers threw games to draft this guy, which you should never do. Don’t mess with karma. Do the right thing. Here endeth the lesson.
