Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
 - Sep 17, 2008
 
- Messages
 - 94,235
 
- Likes
 - 57,492
 
- Points
 - 113
 
This is what I'm saying as well. So what if a federal legislation on background and mental health checks happen and violence is still a major problem. What do we do next? More legislation after legislation and civil liberties being compromised until one day we realize no citizen can obtain guns legally. Then what?
As I've said before, illegal drugs are still being sold, even when the government spends hundreds of millions of dollars to enforce the war on drugs. The criminals will still be able to obtain guns. Look at Mexico. They have a gun ban and the only ones with guns are the cartels and other violent criminals.
Maybe instead of punishing those that obey the laws, we should find positive solutions.
It just seems like the trend is that something like Umpqua happens, and then all these people who know zero about guns or gun legislation take to social media screaming about how this must be stopped, and we need gun control!!111!!11!!!!1
They act as though there is zero gun control currently. Like anyone can just walk into a gun store, hand over some cash, and walk out. No questions asked. That's simply not true. If you want to buy a gun, you have to go through a background check. And in the case of this asshole, who reportedly owned three handguns and had been planning this for a while, how do you stop that? If he purchased them legally, and he planned it out so it wasn't spur of the moment, how do you stop that from happening?
I guess I just don't understand how there seems to be a huge demographic that doesn't actually want to find a way to prevent this from happening. They just want to get rid of guns. They aren't looking at the reason it happened. Guns aren't the reason it happened. This guy was starved for attention and he knew that shooting a bunch of people would get him attention. That's the REASON it happened. He was a disturbed, lonely, depressed individual. That's the REASON it happened. Guns were the method, but not the reason.
If I walked up and punched you in the face with no explanation. No words spoken. You would probably fight back, but afterwards you'd probably want to know why I punched you in the face, right? Did you wrong me somehow? Did you say something that pissed me off? Or maybe I'm just a nut job who walked up to the first person I saw and punched them in the face.