Should we have traded 2007 Draft Pick for Tim Duncan?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Durant or Duncan?

  • Durant

    Votes: 3 25.0%
  • Duncan

    Votes: 9 75.0%

  • Total voters
    12

KingSpeed

Veteran
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
63,361
Likes
22,538
Points
113
People always talk about how we should’ve drafted Durant, but what about the trade the Spurs offered us? What was the best move there? Drafting Durant or trading for Duncan?
 
Drafting Durant was on my mind at that time when Oden got injured but prior to it the draft choice was not as relevant for me. We should have acquired Duncan for his skillset and his model behavior. All class!
 
People always talk about how we should’ve drafted Durant, but what about the trade the Spurs offered us? What was the best move there? Drafting Durant or trading for Duncan?

From what I recall that was a rumor that was denied by the Spurs.
 
From what I recall that was a rumor that was denied by the Spurs.
It's not too often with players involved that teams confirm rumors.
Would you think pop would say yeah, we offered timmy for oden, but they said no.
 
It's not too often with players involved that teams confirm rumors.
Would you think pop would say yeah, we offered timmy for oden, but they said no.
Exactly. They have to deny it out of respect for Duncan.
 
It's not too often with players involved that teams confirm rumors.
Would you think pop would say yeah, we offered timmy for oden, but they said no.

Do you really think Pops would trade Duncan? He was still in his prime then and was like a son to pops. From what I also recall it was a rumor being spread by Quick with no name involved and everyone speculated it was Duncan.
 
Exactly. They have to deny it out of respect for Duncan.

Did you ever see any articles that said Spurs were willing to trade Duncan? If so, then they should be on the web. Find one that validates your rumor.
 
I have it on good authority that the Spurs inquired about the pick. They did win one title after that but by then, Duncan was a shell of his former self and Leonard was far and away the MVP. Can you imagine Durant (if that is who they chose) and Leonard over that last 7+ years? Damn!
 
I have it on good authority that the Spurs inquired about the pick. They did win one title after that but by then, Duncan was a shell of his former self and Leonard was far and away the MVP. Can you imagine Durant (if that is who they chose) and Leonard over that last 7+ years? Damn!
They would've taken Oden. Every one would have taken Oden and if they say otherwise they are lying and using hindsight.
 
True story take it for what it’s worth. I was talking to Dave Twardzik, who was with Orlando in the front office at the time, and I will never forget him saying “Durant will be incredible, HOF, and is better than Oden but nobody I know would take Durant you just can’t pass on a once in a lifetime center like Oden”. It was the day of the draft lottery.
 
True story take it for what it’s worth. I was talking to Dave Twardzik, who was with Orlando in the front office at the time, and I will never forget him saying “Durant will be incredible, HOF, and is better than Oden but nobody I know would take Durant you just can’t pass on a once in a lifetime center like Oden”. It was the day of the draft lottery.

I can't imagine local Draft guru D69 was the only one who did as much research as he did and came away with Durant being "the obvious" choice. He had a list of reasons as to why and I can't believe he was the only one with that information or thought process.
 
Almost everyone. I know one pretend GM that has picture proof of whom they would have taken...and it wasn't Oden. :bgrin:

You're the only one with proof (sign at the draft lotto party)
 
I can't imagine local Draft guru D69 was the only one who did as much research as he did and came away with Durant being "the obvious" choice. He had a list of reasons as to why and I can't believe he was the only one with that information or thought process.

Fear. Go with the most popular choice. Takes balls to go KD for GMs at that time. People have a short memory. Different era too. Big men were valuable. Nowadays it’s a no brainer Kd.
 
I can't imagine local Draft guru D69 was the only one who did as much research as he did and came away with Durant being "the obvious" choice. He had a list of reasons as to why and I can't believe he was the only one with that information or thought process.
Once again, lots of people would've taken Durant. Just not a GM of a real team.
 
Orlando would't have taken Oden because they had Howard. And Phoenix might have taken Durant over Oden because he would have fit D'antoni's system like a glove and they had Amare inside.

but other than those two teams, I'd bet 28 others would have went for Oden, even Boston contrary to the spin out of there

as it turned out, Portland winning the lottery was a curse. They could have finished 2nd and got Durant. They could have finished 3rd and got Horford. Either would have made those Roy/Aldridge teams exciting. Losing the value of that #1 pick coupled with only getting 4 good years out of the 6th pick and Roy set the franchise back big time, especially when you factor in the Blazers had a 3rd pick in 2005 and turned it into Martell Webster

2005 - #3 --> Webster
2006 - #4 --> Aldridge
2006 - #7 --> Roy
2007 - #1 --> Oden
2008 - #11 --> Bayless

5 years after drafting Roy, Aldridge was the only one of those still on the team. That has to be a historically bad result
 
I like to answer silly questions with good answers. We should have traded the pick for Cleveland's 2019 first round pick and their 2021 first.
 
Orlando would't have taken Oden because they had Howard. And Phoenix might have taken Durant over Oden because he would have fit D'antoni's system like a glove and they had Amare inside.

but other than those two teams, I'd bet 28 others would have went for Oden, even Boston contrary to the spin out of there

as it turned out, Portland winning the lottery was a curse. They could have finished 2nd and got Durant. They could have finished 3rd and got Horford. Either would have made those Roy/Aldridge teams exciting. Losing the value of that #1 pick coupled with only getting 4 good years out of the 6th pick and Roy set the franchise back big time, especially when you factor in the Blazers had a 3rd pick in 2005 and turned it into Martell Webster

2005 - #3 --> Webster
2006 - #4 --> Aldridge
2006 - #7 --> Roy
2007 - #1 --> Oden
2008 - #11 --> Bayless

5 years after drafting Roy, Aldridge was the only one of those still on the team. That has to be a historically bad result
But we bounced back quick with Dame. I think Orlando would’ve taken Oden and traded Howard.
 
I like to answer silly questions with good answers. We should have traded the pick for Cleveland's 2019 first round pick and their 2021 first.
Yeah, it's pretty common to trade a pick for 2 picks 12 and 14 years into the future.
 
Almost everyone. I know one pretend GM that has picture proof of whom they would have taken...and it wasn't Oden. :bgrin:

I remember thinking at the time, "man I feel like we're in a Michael Jordan scenario again."
 
Never offered

Since we are dealing in hypotheticals though, should we have drafted Magic Johnson, or traded for Kareem?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top