3RA1N1AC
00110110 00111001
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2008
- Messages
- 20,918
- Likes
- 5,168
- Points
- 113
And, no braniac, I don't mean 15 year old boys to use
ive heard the term, but never actually knew exactly what it reffered to, thanks for sharing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And, no braniac, I don't mean 15 year old boys to use
Well, when a dude on a conveyer belt is making twice the money that someone who went to college is making, that says something. Unions were created to ensure that working conditions were safe, but that's not really a problem anymore. Hell, you don't need a union to sue the shit out of a company for negligence. They are an archaic system that is strangling this country.
you clearly misunderstand the representative purpose of unions.....
Well, increasingly that white collar guy with the database is outside the US. But that also means there are a lot of emerging markets for American products too.
But people get too hung up about unions. I think they can be a good thing or a pain in the ass, but that's not a uniquely American issue:
Union % of workforce by country
![]()
Most of them are.
Check out how the economies of the countries at the top of that graph are doing....
He'll be along. I have lit the 'batman' search light...
no wonder he has not shown his face.. you need to put the "crazy as Batshit" search light on
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
Now that was some funny line right there.
***************** UPDATE *****************
I was talking with a coworker just now. Her husband works for a close competitor of Hostess. They are going to step up and increase their similar product lines by 400% immediately. However, as they don't want to happen to them what the union did to Hostess, they will not add a single person. It will all be done via automation and with the same people they already have.
If you believe that I've got some beautiful riverfront property in Christmas Valley you might be interested in.
If you believe that I've got some beautiful riverfront property in Christmas Valley you might be interested in.
Hmmm.
Liberals are always being accused of "class warfare". What's it called when conservatives do it?
The left wants higher taxes on the rich; the right wants to cut wages for the people who actually work for a living. And people wonder why I find the left the lesser of evils.
Hmmm.
Liberals are always being accused of "class warfare". What's it called when conservatives do it?
The left wants higher taxes on the rich; the right wants to cut wages for the people who actually work for a living. And people wonder why I find the left the lesser of evils.
What goes unnoticed is that the 6,000 odd union employees helped to put a firm of 18,000 over the edge. Management certainly shares some blame, but right now one employee killed the jobs of three.
So, my (serious) question is, isn't it in the better interest of the company for the management to concede to the union's wishes and take a pay cut instead of pocketing millions of dollars as they fold their company? I mean, it just seems petty. But maybe I don't understand how this stuff works.
Likely it's a choice between lowering labor costs or operating at a structural loss, which in the business world really isn't a choice at all.
So would a union actually make a demand of the company they work for that would cause that company to fold, like what we're supposed to believe happened at Hostess?
Also please explain what "operating at a structural loss" means.
The company, weighed down by debt, management turmoil, rising labor costs and the changing tastes of America,
Irving, Texas-based Hostess filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January for the second time in less than a decade. Its predecessor company, Interstate Bakeries, sought bankruptcy protection in 2004 and changed its name to Hostess after emerging in 2009.
