So tired of hearing, these are the least liked candidates in history!

[MarAzul]

I only dislike one of them. I don't want anything she says she will do. On the other hand, the nation will be far better off if Trump does what he says he will do.
I don't need him to be my pastor, but then I don't expect him to embarrass the hell out of me like Bill Clinton either.

 

[The Real Donald]

Marshall is right. I'm not disliked. I'm loved! Especially by the women. I've had ALL the women and made ALL the sex. The best sex. I told Billy Bush about my sex. He was amazed. It was like my own personal Vietnam. Worse, even. I have PTSD. You know what the P stands for. And the D. And I think there is STD in there. But not in here. Not in Trump. All white meat. Send me $100. I love America and foreign women.

Somebody get me outta this already.

 

[MarAzul]

Marshall is right.

Dogald?

 

[Fez Hammersticks]

 

[Rhal]

I only dislike one of them. I don't want anything she says she will do. On the other hand, the nation will be far better off if Trump does what he says he will do.
I don't need him to be my pastor, but then I don't expect him to embarrass the hell out of me like Bill Clinton either.

How can you compare Trump and Clinton in the embarrassment department? If Bill embarrassed you then you should never leave the closet from the embarrassment that is Trump.

 

[MarAzul]

If Bill embarrassed you

Yes, I expect a President to know a few things by the time he takes office. Don't you?

 

[barfo]

On the other hand, the nation will be far better off if Trump does what he says he will do.

You think the nation needs to be kissed and grabbed by the pussy?

Yes, I expect a President to know a few things by the time he takes office. Don't you?

Sure. What is it that you think Trump knows? Or are you saying he's going to learn a few things between Nov 8 and Jan 20?

barfo

 

[blue32]

You think the nation needs to be kissed and grabbed by the pussy?

barfo

Maybe not kissed. But certainly this country has turned pussy and yes we need to be grabbed by it and shook the fuck awake.


Actions are worse than words. Trump has been found guilty of nothing but pissing off a few social justice politically correct warriors out there, which is standard issue in today's society.

However, we all know what happened to Bill and him and his brood are being supported to go back into the White House. Insane.

 

[crandc]

A lot of people really like Hillary Clinton, despite 25 years of nonstop attacks which have created a caricature that has little to do with the real person.

 

[BoBoBREWSKI]

A lot of people really like Hillary Clinton, despite 25 years of nonstop attacks which have created a caricature that has little to do with the real person.

And a lot of people think the crook should be in prison.

 

[BoBoBREWSKI]

You may be tired of hearing it, but it's true. These two dip shits are the most disliked presidential candidates in history. A large percentage of voters feel like we are stuck voting for the lesser of two evils. It's sad.

 

[Chris Craig]

But aren't they the least liked candidates in history of the two main parties? Name two candidates that ran against each other for president that had a shared unfavorabity like Trump and Hillary

 

[e_blazer]

Hillary has always had low likability ratings, which is why Obama wiped the floor with her in 2008 when she was otherwise the presumptive nominee. Hurricane Donald benefited from far right wing anger and a multiplicity of candidates to steal the Republican nomination, but you'd have to look long and hard to find another candidate who was less likable to the general electorate. The guy appeals to his base but is disgusting to everybody else.

 

[MarAzul]

But aren't they the least liked candidates in history of the two main parties? Name two candidates that ran against each other for president that had a shared unfavorabity like Trump and Hillary

I don't need to like the man. Actually you don't either. What we both need is a person to be the chief executive of the Nation, be the Commander in Chief ,take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and above all, uphold and protect the Constitution. End runs around the Constitution are out of bounds implicitly.

 

[Chris Craig]

I don't need to like the man. Actually you don't either. What we both need is a person to be the chief executive of the Nation, be the Commander in Chief ,take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and above all, uphold and protect the Constitution. End runs around the Constitution are out of bounds implicitly.

Come on you can't seriously tell me Trump would make even near a decent president. Dude would turn the white house into a reality show. He'd do an apprentice like show to pick his cabinet members

The world would never take us seriously again.

 

[blue32]

Come on you can't seriously tell me Trump would make even near a decent president. Dude would turn the white house into a reality show. He'd do an apprentice like show to pick his cabinet members

The world would never take us seriously again.

Honestly they don't take us seriously now, and even less so if Hilliar get's into the office. You read some of these emails? Hell even her own foundation staff says she'll smile to your face as she's putting a knife your back.

 

[Chris Craig]

Honestly they don't take us seriously now, and even less so if Hilliar get's into the office. You read some of these emails? Hell even her own foundation staff says she'll smile to your face as she's putting a knife your back.

With her finger, a woman's finger next to that nuclear button, the world is going to listen...

 

[Chris Craig]

Trump thinks he's gonna become president and the world's just going to bow to him like a king, kiss his ass, and do everything hes asks...hes fucking delusional

 

[MarAzul]

Trump would make even near a decent president.

Absolutely! The only candidate that will do as specified in the Constitution. Especially the take care see faithfully executed. We already know Hillary has no intention to do so, or up holding the Constitution.

The world would never take us seriously again.

Sure they will, for the first time in a long time now. It is time.

 

[barfo]

Absolutely! The only candidate that will do as specified in the Constitution.

No idea why you'd believe that. He's proposed numerous things that are unquestionably unconstitutional.

barfo

 

[MarAzul]

He's proposed numerous things that are unquestionably unconstitutional.

Oh please, enumerate.

 

[riverman]

Absolutely! The only candidate that will do as specified in the Constitution. Especially the take care see faithfully executed. We already know Hillary has no intention to do so, or up holding the Constitution.



Sure they will, for the first time in a long time now. It is time.

Why aren't you voting for the Constitution Party Candidate Darrell Castle? This is your guy according to your post...not Trump
http://www.constitutionparty.com/

 

[MarAzul]

This is your guy according to your post...not Trump

Heh? He has no chance. I don't know him. Glen Beck doesn't use logic well.

 

[barfo]

Oh please, enumerate.

1. Religious test for entering the country.
2. Restrictions on the free press.
3. Torture
4. Threat to have his opponent jailed

there are probably many more...

barfo

 

[H.C.]

I'll never understand why Democrats believe what CNN was spewing after Trump said he'd appoint someone to "throw Hillary in jail".
"How very Putin of him!". "In America we don't jail people for being political opponents."
That's not what I heard. But I guess people would rather be spoon-fed opinions than form a thought.

 

[barfo]

I'll never understand why Democrats believe what CNN was spewing after Trump said he'd appoint someone to "throw Hillary in jail".
"How very Putin of him!". "In America we don't jail people for being political opponents."
That's not what I heard. But I guess people would rather be spoon-fed opinions than form a thought.

Apparently you heard the same thing everyone else did.

barfo

 

[MarAzul]

1. Religious test for entering the country.

>>> Entering the Country and being granted legal residence are two different things. Then being granted Citizenship if another.
While he is specifically looking at Muslims and rightfully so, since it was Muslims that declared Jihad on the US. Muslims are the only religion that has this concept

There is nothing in the Constitutions that requires we allow entry to all people. We certainly need not grant entry to people we are at war with even if they are religious.
Jihad as the Muslims define it, is about the same as a declaration of war except is is by a religion, the religion of Islam rather than a country. Although, religion of Islam seems to
assume there is a Caliphate so the religion is in many ways more than just a religion, it is also a system of laws. Laws that are not compatible with our Constitution.

Therefore the implementation of preventing Muslims from being granted residence in the US, need not be a religious test, but a prudent prohibition against people from an area the world where people do support Jihad, Sharia Law or from areas where we do not have a means of vetting them. Nothing in the Constitutions requires the people to support a suicide pack or even imprudent immigration.

2. Restrictions on the free press.
>> This is very interesting. The press has been granted special rights and privileges under our law, so they may keep the people informed. The have failed totally to do their duty to keep the people inform, indeed, it appears they have colluded with those they should be closely watching. Hence, there becomes a market for the likes of Wikileaks. I don't know that restrictions is the right word, but new requirement and or laws do need to be put in place to right this dastardly wrong. Without violating the Constitution of course, perhaps amending an amendment will be required.

3. Torture
>>> Nothing in the Constitution about Torture. Perhaps you mean some convention.

4. Threat to have his opponent jailed
>>> Perhaps I missed the "threat". I did hear him promise to have his AG initiate an investigation of activities of Mrs. Clinton. Seems quite reasonable, might even want to investigate the FBI
too. Nothing in the Constitution prohibits this activity.

there are probably many more...
>>>Please continue to inumerate.



barfo

 

[H.C.]

Apparently you heard the same thing everyone else did.

barfo

Umm I guess my elite typing skills were too difficult for you to handle. Clearly I stated that's what CNN and Dem's were saying.

I'll never understand why Democrats believe what CNN was spewing after Trump said he'd appoint someone to "throw Hillary in jail".
"How very Putin of him!". "In America we don't jail people for being political opponents."
That's not what I heard. But I guess people would rather be spoon-fed opinions than form a thought.

Nice try though.