Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's nowhere near as snappy a dresser as Nate.
I'm just happy that I don't have the ability to know who the ball is going to and what plays are being called. Nate was terribly predictible. Scotts is unpredictible and has multiple plays designed on offense.
I wish Scotts could bring up the level of D though. I think a lot of it has to do with timing though. I suspect the D will get so much better by mid season.
Say it with me: "Stotts!"

He isn't Mo Cheeks bad, but he is no savior either. I agree with the wag who said his nickname should be "interim".He's a .500 coach who is content to let LMA settle for jump shots.
He isn't Mo Cheeks bad, but he is no savior either. I agree with the wag who said his nickname should be "interim".
He's a .500 coach who is content to let LMA settle for jump shots.
He isn't Mo Cheeks bad, but he is no savior either. I agree with the wag who said his nickname should be "interim".
He's a .500 coach who is content to let LMA settle for jump shots.
He isn't Mo Cheeks bad, but he is no savior either. I agree with the wag who said his nickname should be "interim".
In 5 games, he'll be a .667 coach.
He needs to cross his arms more...
BNM
I like Stotts It's just to damn bad Oshley and Allen will can his ass in a few years and promote Kaleb Canales.
