AldoTrapani
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2019
- Messages
- 9,521
- Likes
- 2,757
- Points
- 113
Lol I am no where near a Homer around these parts. I'd be leaning more to pessimist than anything. But I will call bs on either side lol.
My man
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol I am no where near a Homer around these parts. I'd be leaning more to pessimist than anything. But I will call bs on either side lol.
It’s not a mystery. We had really bad players playing significant minutes.
Carmelo BPM -3.6
Simons BPM -4.5
Bazemore BPM -3.2
Mario BPM -2.9
Tolliver -3.3
Swannigan -5.6
We still have bad players (Hood, Simons, Melo) but not as many and they’re not as bad (Hood is worse but he’s one guy).
just a quibble, but the median/generic BPM on a team 7 games over .500 is going to be higher than on a team 4 games under .500
I'm not sure how you'd normalize the BPM's between the two Blazer teams
something else: last year, 4 players (Dame-Whiteside-Nurk-CJ) had positive BPM's. This year, only two players (Dame-CJ) have positive BPM's. On the other hand, this year, only 4 players have BPM's lower than -3.0. Last year, 9 players were worse than -3.0
Also, a stat that is sobering this year is looking at our losses to "good" teams.
Utah -20
Clippers -23
Milwaukee -28
Phoenix -32
SAS -21
Indiana -23
Getting destroyed by the teams you are going to face in the playoffs is not a good sign. Of course some of these games are without CJ/Nurk. You have to be ecstatic that our record gives us some breathing room considering the injuries, but they better hope to put together some good performances when CJ/Nurk are actually back. The hope is that we are playing good basketball by the time the playoffs arrive.
I bag on you a lot... but the playoff success (or lack there of) will rear it's ugly head. It's like a friend's with benefits... in the moment it's fun as hell but the moment it becomes serious it's over.
I can't wait to get back to the type of playoff success we enjoyed before Olshey, Stotts and Dame...I bag on you a lot... but the playoff success (or lack there of) will rear it's ugly head. It's like a friend's with benefits... in the moment it's fun as hell but the moment it becomes serious it's over.
No Green Font Needed!I can't wait to get back to the type of playoff success we enjoyed before Olshey, Stotts and Dame...
I can't wait to get back to the type of playoff success we enjoyed before Olshey, Stotts and Dame...
How can we have playoff success “again” when we didn’t have it before? When Olshey and Stotts joined the organization, the Blazers hadn’t won a playoff series in TWELVE YEARS. Anfernee Simons was 1 years old.Take out olshey and stotts and we have playoff success again.
Your green font lost.
Exactly.How can we have playoff success “again” when we didn’t have it before? When Olshey and Stotts joined the organization, the Blazers hadn’t won a playoff series in TWELVE YEARS. Anfernee Simons was 1 years old.
How can we have playoff success “again” when we didn’t have it before? When Olshey and Stotts joined the organization, the Blazers hadn’t won a playoff series in TWELVE YEARS. Anfernee Simons was 1 years old.
TWELVE YEARSBlazers made the playoffs for 21 consecutive years, and 27 of 28 years (the coaches in that period included Mo Cheeks, Mike Dunleavy, PJ Carlesimo, and Mike Schuller). Those teams won 3 western conference finals and a championship. Those teams won 21 games in the conference finals and NBA finals. The Olshey/Stotts teams haven't won a single game past the semi's in 9 years, and they have a .357 record in the playoffs. Normalize that winning percentage to a season and they win 29 of 82 games
gauging the Olshey/Stotts teams by the worst period in Blazer history is cherry-picking deflection
