Speaker John A. Boehner will resign from Congress and give up his House seat at the end of October

[dviss1]

Regardless, PP broke the law if they even sold 1 aborted baby part for profit. Do you support selling baby parts for profit?

Don't ask me stupid ass questions like that. The videos are bullshit you're swallowing tea.

 

[BrianFromWA]

The Republicans have been trying to strip Planned Parenthood funding for years. Planned Parenthood is an excellent program that helps inner city people like myself. After my high school years I wasn't making much money. Planned Parenthood was very necessary for me to obtain very low cost birth control. Because of this my son was born when I was 30. I got the chance to plan when I became a parent. Stripping federal funding from Planned Parenthood is going to result in more intercity youth and poor people having more unwanted pregnancies. These babies will have to be paid for. Now, the reason why The Lying Republicans want to restrict funding to Planned Parenthood is based upon a goddamn lie. Plain and simple. They know this Brian... They know they are lying... Obama knows they are lying... So when you say that you will not fund the rest of the government based upon something you know is a lie, it is you not funding the government. Not the president that is vetoing the bill that strips funding for poor people. He like I is simply tired of Republicans hammering on the poor. I applaud him for vetoing this bill. Had federal funding not been there for Planned Parenthood who knows if I would have been able to plan when I was a parent. Republicans are simply throwing red meat to their base.

We have different ideas about "choosing to become a parent", but that's ok.

Planned Parenthood is not the only place poor people can go for low-cost birth control. They aren't the only place for health care, and they aren't the only place for abortions. There will likely not be "more intercity youth and poor people having unwanted pregnancies", especially if the funding goes to alternate health care venues (like Arkansas, Utah and other states are doing).

They do however, seem to be the only group that is a) funded by the government, b) conducts abortions, c) has "edited" video evidence of selling baby parts.

 

[dviss1]

The bottom line in all of this is that Bohener had trouble as speaker controlling his house. Peter King was right when he said that the crazies are taking over. Bohener was not a puppet.

 

[dviss1]

We have different ideas about "choosing to become a parent", but that's ok.

Planned Parenthood is not the only place poor people can go for low-cost birth control. They aren't the only place for health care, and they aren't the only place for abortions. There will likely not be "more intercity youth and poor people having unwanted pregnancies", especially if the funding goes to alternate health care venues (like Arkansas, Utah and other states are doing).

They do however, seem to be the only group that is a) funded by the government, b) conducts abortions, c) has "edited" video evidence of selling baby parts.

Use a little common sense. If late term abortions are banned what can be done with 20 week old baby parts? The baby is the size of a shrimp... Use your brain people... Stop swallowing the tea...

 

[GriLtCheeZ]

Um, they started campaigning against repealing what he had done because THEY WERE VOTED INTO OFFICE TO DO SO. Do you think it's a magical coincidence that, following 2 years of President Obama, a Pelosi-led House and a Reid-led Senate (filibuster-proof majority!), 64 of those House D's lost their seats, and about 40 went to Tea Party/Freedom Caucus types? And they've added 5 seats since to that? And that the Senate D's have lost 16 seats since 2010?

I'm someone who wants smaller government, less military intervention in nation-building, diplomacy from strength, people to follow the laws (including but not limited to immigration), the majority of Pell Grants and other Federal Grants to go to student in STEM programs, Social Security to pay for Social Security (whether that means increase the tax % or increase retirement age is a debate we can have), Medicare/Caid to pay for Medicare/Caid (same caveats), comprehensive health care reform (not just lining insurance company pockets), intelligent alternative energy sources, and for religion to be out of government control. Many of those voted in over the last 5 years believe many/most of those things, and the President doesn't. I, as one voter, don't want to see the President accomplish almost anything on his agenda, and want a repeal of some of the stuff he and those already voted out have already accomplished. And many of the constituents of people voted in agree.

I get that that doesn't play well in Oregon.

More like GERRYMANDERED INTO OFFICE!!!

 

[dviss1]

We have different ideas about "choosing to become a parent", but that's ok.

We do? I take the common sense approach by saying that I may potentially choose to be a parent if I don't use a condom. What's your idea?

 

[BrianFromWA]

The fact that the Tea Party took over the house has nothing to do with what the people wanted. Republican governors have gerrymandered the districts and you know this. Look up the Concord project and you will see exactly how the Tea Party took over the house. They were well funded. It was not a grassroots movement. They were well funded by smart people who made sure that they became precinct committee men. Those are the people who vote to choose who's going to be on the ballot. It was not the people speaking, it was a well-funded intelligent plan.

I don't think you're correct on this, but I'll give you a pass...but if you're correct on this, how did the D's lose 16 seats in the Senate? Did North Carolina and Iowa and Louisiana (and 6 others) get gerrymandered in 2014?

 

[dviss1]

I don't think you're correct on this, but I'll give you a pass...but if you're correct on this, how did the D's lose 16 seats in the Senate? Did North Carolina and Iowa and Louisiana (and 6 others) get gerrymandered in 2014?

I don't need your Pass. Like I said do your homework and look up the Concord project.

 

[BrianFromWA]

Like I said, did 16 entire states get Gerrymandered so that the D's unfairly lost their Senate seats?

 

[BrianFromWA]

We do? I take the common sense approach by saying that I may potentially choose to be a parent if I don't use a condom. What's your idea?

I'm pretty simple. If I couldn't afford a condom and didn't want to be a parent (or be at risk for an STD), I didn't stick my dick into anyone. But I recognize that that's supposedly not an option for many.

 

[dviss1]

Like I said, did 16 entire states get Gerrymandered so that the D's unfairly lost their Senate seats?

So instead of answering the question you deflect and talk about the Senate. The topic of discussion from the beginning of this has been the house. The Republicans didn't take over the Senate in that 2010 midterm election.

 

[dviss1]

I'm pretty simple. If I couldn't afford a condom and didn't want to be a parent (or be at risk for an STD), I didn't stick my dick into anyone. But I recognize that that's supposedly not an option for many.

This is just silly. People want to fuck so we're going to. If I can get 13 chances to fuck for a dollar dammit I'm going to pay that dollar. Abstinence is for kids.

 

[dviss1]

The defunding of Planned Parenthood plan is the exact same plan as the defunding of ACORN. Plain and simple. Based upon a lie. The only difference is the videos are edited by a better company. Like I said, common sense should come into play here. There are really no such thing as 20 week old baby parts...

 

[BrianFromWA]

So instead of answering the question you deflect and talk about the Senate. The topic of discussion from the beginning of this has been the house. The Republicans didn't take over the Senate in that 2010 midterm election.

Fine. I don't know a thing about gerrymandering. Which is why I said I didn't believe you, but I'd give you the pass on it because you seemed to know something I didn't. I think it's amazing that you think that the R's found a trick to get 40 seats into the hands of Tea Partiers, but I don't know so I don't take an uninformed stand. However, I do know that the Senate D's have lost 16 seats since they had a super-majority, and that there have been no gerrymandered states. So my uninformed conclusion is to think that, even if you were right that the only possible way that those "Lying Republican" Teabagging tricksters were able to hoodwink the good liberal public was to cheat on gerrymandering, what possible explanation can you have for the D's losing fully a third of the seats in the Senate in less than 5 years?

 

[dviss1]

I truly believe that John Boehner was sick of the crazy Tea Party element in his party. The Pope coming finally gave him that realization.

 

[BrianFromWA]

This is just silly. People want to fuck so we're going to. If I can get 13 chances to fuck for a dollar dammit I'm going to pay that dollar. Abstinence is for kids.

so go for it. Pay that dollar. I just don't want to pay Planned Parenthood to sell it to you. Get it from 7-11 or from the local clinic. What's your problem with that?

 

[BrianFromWA]

I truly believe that John Boehner was sick of the crazy Tea Party element in his party. The Pope coming finally gave him that realization.

I think many of the people who voted in those "crazy Tea Party element" are happy he's gone. So it's a win-win.

 

[dviss1]

Fine. I don't know a thing about gerrymandering. Which is why I said I didn't believe you, but I'd give you the pass on it because you seemed to know something I didn't. I think it's amazing that you think that the R's found a trick to get 40 seats into the hands of Tea Partiers, but I don't know so I don't take an uninformed stand. However, I do know that the Senate D's have lost 16 seats since they had a super-majority, and that there have been no gerrymandered states. So my uninformed conclusion is to think that, even if you were right that the only possible way that those "Lying Republican" Teabagging tricksters were able to hoodwink the good liberal public was to cheat on gerrymandering, what possible explanation can you have for the D's losing fully a third of the seats in the Senate in less than 5 years?

That I truly can't explain. When you want to put quotes around teabagging tricksters you have to understand who's been funding them. You still haven't looked up the Concorde project have you?

 

[BrianFromWA]

The defunding of Planned Parenthood plan is the exact same plan as the defunding of ACORN. Plain and simple. Based upon a lie. The only difference is the videos are edited by a better company. Like I said, common sense should come into play here. There are really no such thing as 20 week old baby parts...

A 20-week old baby is generally about a foot long and about a pound. What are you talking about?

 

[dviss1]

so go for it. Pay that dollar. I just don't want to pay Planned Parenthood to sell it to you. Get it from 7-11 or from the local clinic. What's your problem with that?

I can afford condoms now. But for people who can't, 7-eleven stores sell three condoms for $4.99. Condoms should not be that expensive and frankly there are people who cannot afford that. That's the problem...

 

[dviss1]

A 20-week old baby is generally about a foot long and about a pound. What are you talking about?

Okay, I'm willing to admit I was wrong about that. It's still about the size of a banana. If you truly think there are people that are buying these baby parts then I have some swamp land to sell you in Florida.

 

[BrianFromWA]

I can afford condoms now. But for people who can't, 7-eleven stores sell three condoms for $4.99. Condoms should not be that expensive and frankly there are people who cannot afford that. That's the problem...

I'm slightly confused by where you're going with this. On Amazon they're 33cents/condom. In stores they're generally 50c/per. But even if it's 1.66/per, you're saying that Planned Parenthood being funded by the government is the only way to thwart those high prices?

 

[3RA1N1AC]

no condoms/no abortions, but when they have a kid its "welfare queen!"

Pathetic. Fake Christians trying to regulate sex because they aren't having any.

 

[BrianFromWA]

Okay, I'm willing to admit I was wrong about that. It's still about the size of a banana. If you truly think there are people that are buying these baby parts then I have some swamp land to sell you in Florida.

I get that you seem to be invested pretty heavily in this, but the CEO of Planned Parenthood says that they sell fetal tissue ("baby parts"), which means that someone is "buying them". She just says that they are not illegally profiting and following all laws in doing so, which the (edited) videos seem to debunk. Regardless, she sells baby parts.

 

[BrianFromWA]

no condoms/no abortions, but when they have a kid its "welfare queen!"

Pathetic. Fake Christians trying to regulate sex because they aren't having any.

you can have all the condoms you want. They're just about free. Why do I have to pay an abortion provider for you to get one? WHy can't you get one from the school I'm paying, or the health clinic I'm paying...

For Pete's Sake, I just spent 3 seconds googling and found this. There. PP Defunding problem solved.
http://std.about.com/od/prevention/qt/freecondoms.htm

 

[3RA1N1AC]

I'm not even talking about planned parenthood. Just laughing at the "abstinence" garbage the bible thumpers try to replace condoms with everywhere.

 

[BrianFromWA]

did I preach that? I thought I was pretty clear that most people couldn't/wouldn't do what I did, and I'm fine with that. I just don't think that federal budget to PP is the only way for someone to reduce the risk of unwanted pregnancies among the poor.

 

[3RA1N1AC]

Well, I don't think anyone is arguing that PP is the ONLY way to get condoms lol. They sure do give a lot away though. Which is a good thing.

 

[dviss1]

Well, I don't think anyone is arguing that PP is the ONLY way to get condoms lol. They sure do give a lot away though. Which is a good thing.

This is the point I've been trying to illustrate.

 

[magnifier661]

no condoms/no abortions, but when they have a kid its "welfare queen!"

Pathetic. Fake Christians trying to regulate sex because they aren't having any.

AGAIN.... If PP is selling aborted baby parts for profit, it is 100% illegal.... END OF STORY....

This is the only thing I am concerned with. And if it's such a problem, then just suspend the abortion part of their company and focus on the other support system for women.