andalusian
Season - Restarted
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 15,344
- Likes
- 14,884
- Points
- 113
I disagree with the bold, but completely agree with the last sentence.
In the season Steve Nash turned 25 (his third in the league), he shot 36% from the field while playing, well, Nash-level defense and an A/TO lower than Sergio's. I'm pretty sure you could've said "At this point, we've seen enough to know that Nash will never be a star NBA PG". I'm not saying that Sergio = Nash, but he does have an elite skill that is not commonplace in the NBA, while being poor in two aspects of the game (shooting and defense) that can be worked on. While being 2 years younger than Nash was before his transformation.
In this year, Nash was getting used to a new system and a new coach in a new team. The year before that he had a PER of 15.6 (something Sergio never achieved), TS% of 0.556 (Sergio never cracked the .500 mark, it was the 2nd time Nash did) and a win-score of 4.8 - Sergio, in his entire 3 years has accumulated a win-score of 2.3 which is less than half of what Nash accumulated by himself in his 2nd year...
Also remember that the 3rd year you talk about for Nash is the shortened season where the guys came to play after a long time off - so he never really got the time to get used to his new situation. A year after that, with the extra time to get used to his new system his TS% went up to a fantastic 0.601, his win-score was a very decent 3.1 and he was on his way to become a consistent star...
Again, I wish Sergio nothing but the best - but I think that the comparison to Nash is just wrong - since Nash was a much better shooter from pretty much his 2nd year and has eclipsed everything Sergio achieved to date by his 2nd year...




