No, my suggestion is to define parameters around putting Bayless in, whether starting him (which would be a mistake in my opinion), or putting him 2nd string ahead of Blake.
It's just this endless loop that occurs every year with players on the bench, or rookies, etc. where people are convinced that player X (Telfair, Sergio, Bayless?) is the next greatest thing we've ever seen in our entire lives and that the coach is screwing over the player and us by not letting, nay forcing, said player to play 48 minutes out. Either that or the one bright and shining example of Jermaine O'Neal that gets trotted out every time a rookie shows promise.
I'm honestly asking of those wishing Bayless to start, at what point do you objectively say "Player X is not living up to potential or should not be starting." And you can't just say "When someone else plays better!" because in that circle-of-life game you'd always be wanting to start the bench player to see if they could do better.
