chzbrgr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2015
- Messages
- 1,093
- Likes
- 1,101
- Points
- 113
Is that the franchise you want to be associated with though?so? The Knicks have been losing with that title for a long time
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is that the franchise you want to be associated with though?so? The Knicks have been losing with that title for a long time
Melo is from the Cuse. Not a leader, and will never win without at least 2 others being the men.I think he's saying that the Knicks, with Melo, Porzingis, and Rose, have several superstars, so perhaps that's not necessarily a bad situation to which to be compared (as was suggested in the post to which he was replying).
If that's you're argument, then I counter with "What does Lillard do that's so hard to replace besides scoring, which shouldn't be a point guard's primary strength anyway?"Is it though? What does Plumlee do that's so hard to replace besides passing, which shouldn't be a centers primary strength anyway?
Is it though? What does Plumlee do that's so hard to replace besides passing, which shouldn't be a centers primary strength anyway?
If that's you're argument, then I counter with "What does Lillard do that's so hard to replace besides scoring, which shouldn't be a point guard's primary strength anyway?"
Lillard is a better playmaker than whatever Plumlees secondary skill is. Lillard is almost too unselfish. He'd be averaging a lot more assists if he wasn't passing the rock to Al Farouq Aminu and co. And yes, I do like Plumlee. Just not sure I like him with our current roster.
I like his skill set and he seems to keep getting better. I would love to have 4 good passers in the starting lineup. Now if Terry could channel some of Dr. Jack's offense while he is wearing his close, we would be better off......
I agree Scalma that with the current roster Plumlee is not an ideal center. But the roster is not finished. Too bad there is no ABA dismantling. I would kill for a Maurice Lucas to fall in our lap to go with Dame, CJ, ET and Plumlee. But if we could get the right PF to play next to him....... Plumlee might be a good fit.
Yeah I agree. That's why I'm all for starting Vonleh. I like that combination, in theory, but that's all it is now. Let's see how it develops.
But then again, I like a Nurkic/Vonleh pairing even more.
Vonleh and Layman are the only players on our team with "upside", and Vonleh has shown flashes of being an imposing force. He has the physical tools, and skill, but just hasn't got it all put together quite yet.
Vonleh and Layman are the only players on our team with "upside", and Vonleh has shown flashes of being an imposing force. He has the physical tools, and skill, but just hasn't got it all put together quite yet.
There needs to be a point this season--perhaps after Crabbe and Plumlee are traded?--where Harkless, Vonleh, and Leonard are given a consistent 30-35 mpg to see if they can do anything with it.When Vonleh is playing well, I get more excited than I do watching anybody else on the team tbh. He just has so much potential, there's really nothing he couldn't do on a basketball court. I really hope he puts it all together...in Portland. Stotts needs to build up Vonlehs confidence by letting him play through mistakes. He's still only 21!
I tend to agree and it probably means surrendering any hopes of the playoffs. I wonder if coaches, Olshey and Allen have it in them?There needs to be a point this season--perhaps after Crabbe and Plumlee are traded?--where Harkless, Vonleh, and Leonard are given a consistent 30-35 mpg to see if they can do anything with it.
One can only hope. At this point, it truly is the right move. Not "playing to lose" as Wookie might term it, but giving the guys who allegedly have potential the opportunity to sink or swim.I tend to agree and it probably means surrendering any hopes of the playoffs. I wonder if coaches, Olshey and Allen have it in them?
Sure, as a bench guy, absolutely. Connaughton as well, as the designated scoring guard off the bench.I'd toss Layman into that group of sink-or-swimmers. Not because I think he has enormous growth potential, but you never know and the remainder of this season may as well get as many answers as possible.
I don't think so. Harkless seems like he's already reached his ceiling. Can't really explain why, he just doesn't flash anything that makes me believe he can be more than what he is now.You guys saying this are selling Harkless short. He's still super young at only 23.
I don't think so. Harkless seems like he's already reached his ceiling. Can't really explain why, he just doesn't flash anything that makes me believe he can be more than what he is now.
