When studying a timeline and occurrences from ~2000 years ago, everything's murky. There's so much subjectivity that people can morph things into however they want to believe they were.
I think logically... Or at least it just makes more logical sense to me that the dude was a type of cult-leader than a Messiah. Stories from a time that long ago have no ability to be validated. "He was tortured to no end" yada yada... Could've been something that didn't really happen but him and/or his followers pushed for various reason.
I know many religious people that would be offended by this, but my belief is just as valid as theirs. No physical proof. Religion is often a belief system that is inherited as well. If your parents are Mormon, you're more likely to be Mormon. I hate the recruitment-style tactics of religions as well... That part seems extremely cult-ish to me as well, or at least valuing money as much as the religion. I echo
@Natebishop3's sentiments on this.