OT Suspicious Packages

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

@EL PRESIDENTE - you are flat wrong and have become blinded. A couple years ago you would laughed at anyone who fell hook line and sinker for any politician and now you suckle from Trumps teets.
 
No, there were huge antiwar protests. Remeber Bush's AMERIKKKA

So, people didnt agree with invading another country. That seemed like a reasonable way to voice their distaste. Still no bombing eachother. This was the beginning of the rights nationalistic campaign though. Remember that if you didnt support the war then you were anti troops and anti american? That really started to set the stage for Trumps nationalistic mantra.
 
Wrong about what
Wrong in your general assertion that there is any parity between what Trump and those on the right vs. those in power on the left do regularly in both lying and inciting violence. Your whataboutism is strong and ridiculous.
 
Wrong in your general assertion that there is any parity between what Trump and those on the right vs. those in power on the left do regularly in both lying and inciting violence. Your whataboutism is strong and ridiculous.


I was given two very extremely weak examples. Come up with something stronger and maybe you might even start to have a point
 
I was given two very extremely weak examples. Come up with something stronger and maybe you might even start to have a point
How is Trump telling his supporters that he will pay their legal fees for punching protesters a weak example. It’s sooo fucking wrong and is the antithesis of creating a fervent and violent following. Saying it’s weak is what’s weak bro.
 
How is Trump telling his supporters that he will pay their legal fees for punching protesters a weak example. It’s sooo fucking wrong and is the antithesis of creating a fervent and violent following. Saying it’s weak is what’s weak bro.

Its a weak example when you say it causes guys to want to bomb and kill politicians. You're causing more rhetoric by blowing it out of proportion.
 
Its a weak example when you say it causes guys to want to bomb and kill politicians. You're causing more rhetoric by blowing it out of proportion.

An attempt to assassinate 11 people incl. 2 former presidents and one future president is a pretty big deal.

I think your spin isn't very good here, maybe go back to the false flag theory? Perhaps the FBI stuck those stickers on his van and framed him.

barfo
 
An attempt to assassinate 11 people incl. 2 former presidents and one future president is a pretty big deal.

I think your spin isn't very good here, maybe go back to the false flag theory? Perhaps the FBI stuck those stickers on his van and framed him.

barfo

What spin? I asked for examples of Trumps' dangerous rhetoric. All I got was Trump talking about not coddling MS13 Gang Members heads when putting into a squad car and him paying legal fees for people roughing up people who disrupted his rallies.
 
I denounce violence directed at all US politicians. I'm not sure all on the left on this board would make the same statement.
I'm certain that a large percentage of the Right is violent. Look at the filthy language they use. Look at the filthy language our President uses even when others are listening in.
 
Eric Holder: 'When they go low, we go high.' No. When they go low, we kick 'em."

Hillary Clinton: “You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for."

Maxine Waters: "“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”

Robert DeNiro: "Fuck Trump". "I'd like to punch him in the face'"
Only Robert DeNiro said anything about violence.
You can't possibly believe that our ex Attorney General meant to literally use your boot to kick someone.
How does not being civil equate to violence such as body slamming or smashing someone in the face or beating up a protestor?
 
But you fantasize about beating up the President?
That's internal and has nothing to do with reality. Besides, that's my business and not the business of anyone else. I don't think we have thought police yet do we?
 
What spin? I asked for examples of Trumps' dangerous rhetoric. All I got was Trump talking about not coddling MS13 Gang Members heads when putting into a squad car and him paying legal fees for people roughing up people who disrupted his rallies.

You know you’re right. Trump is a steady, calm influence to the country and we can rely on him for restoring peace and get those on both sides who are committing these violent acts and terrorisitc threats under control.
 
That's internal and has nothing to do with reality. Besides, that's my business and not the business of anyone else. I don't think we have thought police yet do we?

So that's two.
 
Two liberals that fantasize about violence against US politicians.
U.S. politicians in general? Or do you mean just Trump?
Also, how does my fantasy affect anyone?
News flash: There are millions of Americanss who fantasize about paying back Trump for all his evil doings.
It appears that you are trying to make a case for thought police.
 
U.S. politicians in general? Or do you mean just Trump?
Also, how does my fantasy affect anyone?
News flash: There are millions of Americanss who fantasize about paying back Trump for all his evil doings.
It appears that you are trying to make a case for thought police.

These nutbags and their violent behavior grow from fantasies gone unchecked.
 
These nutbags and their violent behavior grow from fantasies gone unchecked.
How do you know? Perhaps it's the plan that causes the fantasy as in, oh yeah, that's an idea and what a great idea it is.
If you arrested everyone with a fantasy you'd arrest everyone. You'd have to arrest 90% of those who went through a divorce.
 
How do you know? Perhaps it's the plan that causes the fantasy as in, oh yeah, that's an idea and what a great idea it is.
If you arrested everyone with a fantasy you'd arrest everyone. You'd have to arrest 90% of those who went through a divorce.

After the first few, everyone else will get in line.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top