blazerkor
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2014
- Messages
- 16,539
- Likes
- 17,924
- Points
- 113
I don't know who the target is going to be but I think we will send out multiple future first round picks this off season to put a team around Dame that can contend... in order to do that we would have to in some free this team from the way what we owe Chicago ties up all of our future first round picks.What's the logic there?
The team will trade both first rounders this year and future first(s)?
Dear Lord, I hope not. There's nobody good enough in the NBA to give that much along with matching salaries (which will be two of our best players) to make this team a contender. Or at least none that aren't cornerstones of their current franchises.
If we had gotten Durant for, say, Ant and Nurk and three firsts... we're still not all that good, and we're leaning on two rather injury-prone studs nearing their mid-30s.
Dudes like Siakem or John Collins? We'd be younger but I would argue worse off in the immediate term than we are right now and definitely worse off moving into the future (again, assuming we're giving up Ant and Nurk and picks, at minimum).
The truth is that I don't see the logic in keeping Dame and not going all in this off season. If the team wants to build around the youth on the roster and the picks they have then they should trade Dame but if the team wants to keep Dame, I don't think there is really any logical choice other than trade more than what we have in just this draft to give Dame and the rest of the team a realistic shot at contending.