Here's the problem with what's going on. If I made that post that
@riverman said but said Stotts supporters were all a certain way then I'd have people like
@CupWizier on my case about my posting style and being a bully. I even had
@Wade Garrett complain to the mods about me for asking him why it was okay for him to criticize Whiteside when a few minutes earlier told people to chill out on criticisms and the negative stuff because it made him not want to participate in the forum. Then a game or two later actually had posts that were obviously aimed at me doing the same thing he complained about. I chose not to respond out of respect to the head honcho asking me to avoid him.
@TorturedBlazerFan When someone makes a post calling out a specific group they are starting something. They can argue it's unintentional but then why make the post at all?
The facts are this:
Riverman said Stotts detractors want that to happen.
I responded that was false because I don't want that. The only "personal" part about that is using myself to disprove his statement. He said I was taking it personal and it wasn't directed at him but that his statement wasn't false. If I doubled down like that I would expect there to be blow back my way too. We can all, including myself, do a better job of simply saying in those situations that whoever said it didn't mean to include everyone in those situations.
So now we have Cup coming at me in a conversation that's not even about him and bringing Bones into the conversation, yet we're the ones ruining the forum? It's so damn hypocritical. All I said was that his statement was false and it was.