OT Texas

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Yes, but the only questions you make a serious attempt at answering are the religious ones. You know, where you can state your faith and/or belief and call it good, if for no other reason than NO ONE knows for absolutely certain, so you can’t be proven wrong (or even right). When it comes to the questions that actually have reality (or even science) based answers, you drop the turd in the punch bowl and bolt for the door……..

Right.

Ask me a question, straight up. I'll answer you.
 
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. You don’t get a third chance……..

how-convenient-church-lady.jpg
 
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. You don’t get a third chance……..
This is exactly why I have been avoiding engaging with you lately. I have asked for your opinion more than a few times since your return, and if you don’t like the question, no matter how innocuous it might be, you throw out a flip remark and change the subject. You either don’t like or simply refuse to answer the hard questions in an honest fashion. You apparently have some deep seated need to “win” rather than engage in discussion.
 
This is exactly why I have been avoiding engaging with you lately. I have asked for your opinion more than a few times since your return, and if you don’t like the question, no matter how innocuous it might be, you throw out a flip remark and change the subject. You either don’t like or simply refuse to answer the hard questions in an honest fashion. You apparently have some deep seated need to “win” rather than engage in discussion.

I'm really having trouble remembering which question(s) in particular you are referencing. I spend most of my time fending off the likes of TOA, julius, Sly, Chris, nobs, crandc, Natt, barfo, and many others. I truly apologize if I get flip. Generally, though, my flip responses have to do with politics or religion. Did you ask elsewise?
 
Agnostic, a person who doubts existence of gods but does not reject the concepts
Dyslexic, a person with learning disorder, often has difficulty learning to read, sometimes inaccurately considered unintelligent
Insomniac, a person who chronically or frequently has difficulty sleeping.
 
You don't believe I can read and you lose sleep over it?

Sly would appreciate this response.

An agnostic, dyslexic, insomniac is........someone who lays awake at night....wondering if there really is a dog.
 
Agnostic, a person who doubts existence of gods but does not reject the concepts
Dyslexic, a person with learning disorder, often has difficulty learning to read, sometimes inaccurately considered unintelligent
Insomniac, a person who chronically or frequently has difficulty sleeping.

See above.
 
Sly would appreciate this response.

An agnostic, dyslexic, insomniac is........someone who lays awake at night....wondering if there really is a dog.

You know you tell that same joke at least once a month. I'm starting to think that ABM stands for A Biden Moment.
 
You know you tell that same joke at least once a month. I'm starting to think that ABM stands for A Biden Moment.

crandc and Chris hadn't heard it. go away.
 
You know you tell that same joke at least once a month. I'm starting to think that ABM stands for A Biden Moment.

You're so funny, Sly. This is truly a Piano Man moment.
 
I said earlier it was a bad analogy. My bad
Well, that's the end of that analogy. From my perspective there is no analogy that could possibly apply.
 
Maybe start with this year...

For the record, I think God sees things on a much more international perspective. I really don't think He's limited Himself to a United States political perspective. Really, how arrogant of us to think that He does.
 
If you have to, repeatedly, explain that something you say was meant as a joke, it means you're not actually that funny.
It's not what you say that's wrong it's how you end up that counts. Hopefully, that means all the changes I've made in myself throughout my life have not been in vain.
 
Ask me a question, straight up. I'll answer you.
An object is in freefall. It remains in freefall for 5.4 seconds before it hits the ground. How high was the object when it first started falling if its starting velocity was 0? (Acceleration due to gravity is -9.8 meters/second'2).
 
For the record, I think God sees things on a much more international perspective. I really don't think He's limited Himself to a United States political perspective. Really, how arrogant of us to think that He does.
Who said anything about the US?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABM
crandc and Chris hadn't heard it. go away.

first i heard it. Do your thing.

So many people not wanting to be judged for who they are and what they believe but as so quick to be simultaneously judging you and your beliefs.

Double standards run rampant these days…

lol.
 
Nah, it isn't his or anyone else's business to butt in on. Veer off your lane and you're bound to get hurt sooner or later.

i tend to think of it as everyone has a right to every lane. Because there really arent any lanes. Humans will never stop the competition of thinking themselves better than others. Whether it be in athletics, scholarly accolades, beauty, and unfortunately some include in thier competition race and color.

but people are always going to veer off the lane if we try to have lanes.

I prefer to just accept that not everyone is goign to agree with me, like me or whatever. Its ugly but its been the way of the human race forever and it wont ever change. Its instinctual to compete, be better than the next and with that comes the ugly side.
But freedom is a fickle thing and though it comes with a price, should not be denied.
Pornography is the biproduct of free speech. Etc.
I beleive we are fooling ourselves trying to create some utopian love world.
Believe me, i wish it could be, but observing human behavior on an individual and global level? I dont see it happening. I see the weak getting devoured.
 
To be fair, it wasn't much of a grope (more like a glancing touch). Both chicks were drunk and just being stupid. If it were two dudes, my cuz and I would've gladly helped put them to sleep.

yeah i mean its all situational and how egregious of a grope it is. Glancing touch from a guy deserve a back the fuck off, a full on grope deserves a knockout punch. Lol.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top