"The Bible" Mini-Series

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

The Bible IS christianity and the belief in it and the stories you mention have impacted christianity, which have impacted how people view the world, which has impacted historical events. Example, the Crusades were a war to spread christianity to the heathens. Without the stories and messages in the Bible the Crusades would not have occured. Understanding the root beliefs of people will help you understand why they do/did things. Its a very simple correlation..... plus they are interesting stories and do accuratly portray life in a time period with little records, plus some magic.

Great points!!! Wish I could give you 100 repp'd ratings!
 
Starts tonight! :clap:
 
for those interested, this is one of the most concise histories on the crusades. It ties in several aspcts and is a ten min read http://www.thearma.org/essays/Crusades.htm

It just repeats, paragraph after paragraph, that Crusaders were motivated by religion, not money...which just supports the critics, who say that Christianity killed tens of thousands of Muslims. Nothing new.
 
I turned it on for five minutes and its just not for me. Seems well produced, but to me it's like watching the smurfs, if millions of people based their lives on the smurfs.
 
That's God talking! Listen up!

Incredible killer smurfs is probably how the Middle East views our current Crusaders.
 
I just turned on Trump Celebrity Apprentice All-Stars. I wonder which one is more rooted in reality?
 
Watched it and was a little disappointed that they skimmed through so many good stories. This feels like I went speed dating and just got a glimpse of what the bible is all about. I get that there is a lot to cover, but there were some really good stories that weren't even discussed. Especially the ones with Isaac.
 
Things I learned last night:

1.Noah is Scottish.

2. God is black and Jackie Chan is his best friend.
 
Things I learned last night:

1.Noah is Scottish.

2. God is black and Jackie Chan is his best friend.

Those two were angels. Lol. I think the black one was Gabriel, the arch angel.

If you saw a Abraham taking to god on the mountaintop; it looked like god was Jesus.

I agree about the voices. I hate when they use English to play Jews. It reminds me when Hollywood used white guys to play Indians in the old westerns.
 
Those two were angels. Lol. I think the black one was Gabriel, the arch angel.

If you saw a Abraham taking to god on the mountaintop; it looked like god was Jesus.

I agree about the voices. I hate when they use English to play Jews. It reminds me when Hollywood used white guys to play Indians in the old westerns.

This is why us Jews can't get a job in Hollywood.
 
Watched the first half of the first episode last night. (I torrented it, which I don't feel guilty about because I didn't get to the "thou shalt not steal" thing yet.) I thought it was pretty good. Nice production values, good acting, adheres overall to Christian theology. If you were mad that it was grossly historically inaccurate, well, you might as well get upset over every bible ever printed.

Abraham comes across as a freaky-scary kind of zealot though, doesn't he? Seriously, if that dude lived in your neighborhood wouldn't he rustle your jimmies? Lot's wife is oddly sympathetic. "Are you going to believe this batshit nut?" her eyes seem to ask in every scene. I was kind of happy for her when she turned into salt. At least she didn't have to put up with all the bullshit anymore.

Kind of bummed that they glossed over Lot offering up his daughters for gang rape to protect the angel. But I can see how that life lesson might be a little confusing for the kiddies.

In the end, if you were among the faithful, you found in it exactly the stuff you've always read about (in a more lurid and entertaining presentation). If you were ex-Christian and just wanting to go down memory lane (me), it was pretty good nostalgia.

I'm most curious about those who have considered becoming Christian but haven't drunk the Kool Aid. Personally, I think things like the depiction of Abraham would scare a lot more people away than it'd attract. He comes across more like a member of Al Quaeda than the father of a nation. But that's just my bias.
 
Last edited:
Watched the first half of the first episode last night. (I torrented it, which I don't feel guilty about because I didn't get to the "thou shalt not steal" thing yet.) I thought it was pretty good. Nice production values, good acting, adheres overall to Christian theology. If you were mad that it was grossly historically inaccurate, well, you might as well get upset over every bible ever printed.

Abraham comes across as a freaky-scary kind of zealot though, doesn't he? Seriously, if that dude lived in your neighborhood wouldn't he rustle your jimmies? Lot's wife is oddly sympathetic. "Are you going to believe this batshit nut?" her eyes seem to ask in every scene. I was kind of happy for her when she turned into salt. At least she didn't have to put up with all the bullshit anymore.

Kind of bummed that they glossed over Lot offering up his daughters for gang rape to protect the angel. But I can see how that life lesson might be a little confusing for the kiddies.

In the end, if you were among the faithful, you found in it exactly the stuff you've always read about (in a more lurid and entertaining presentation). If you were ex-Christian and just wanting to go down memory lane (me), it was pretty good nostalgia.

I'm most curious about those who have considered becoming Christian but haven't drunk the Kool Aid. Personally, I think things like the depiction of Abraham would scare a lot more people away than it'd attract. But that's just my bias.

The Old Testament up until psalms was pretty much the "scare factor" you refer to. I just can't wait for king David until after Jesus risen from the dead. Those were the best stories of compassion, love and forgiveness.
 
The Old Testament up until psalms was pretty much the "scare factor" you refer to.

Yeah, I wouldn't say "scare factor" so much as "these guys are freakin' nuts" factor. Not hard to see why Judaism has never been much for expansion. It's just not that marketable.

I'm hoping they spend a lot more time on Revelations than they did Genesis. In the end, people want to know where it all started, where it's all going and why to be good. Christianity focuses a lot on the "why to be good" part, and too little on the other two. I was kind of bummed they bundled up Noah with the first 7 days into such a bundle.
 
Yeah, I wouldn't say "scare factor" so much as "these guys are freakin' nuts" factor. Not hard to see why Judaism has never been much for expansion. It's just not that marketable.

I'm hoping they spend a lot more time on Revelations than they did Genesis. In the end, people want to know where it all started, where it's all going and why to be good. Christianity focuses a lot on the "why to be good" part, and too little on the other two. I was kind of bummed they bundled up Noah with the first 7 days into such a bundle.

Hahahaha that was my main beef too! I was like, "damn they summed up creation, fall if man and world cleansing in the opening credits"
 
http://www.nola.com/tv/index.ssf/2013/03/premiere_of_historys_the_bible.html

Premiere of History's 'The Bible' miniseries scores huge ratings

History announced Monday (March 4) that “The Bible” premiere drew 13.1 viewers to its Sunday (March 3) premiere, and also did well in younger, advertiser-desired demographics. Combined with the premiere of the drama “Vikings,” the Sunday audience was the largest in History’s, um, history.

(my note, the ratings for the show beat all cable network programming, including the Walking Dead. I think the Vikings is more appealing... to me anyhow).
 
http://www.nola.com/tv/index.ssf/2013/03/premiere_of_historys_the_bible.html

Premiere of History's 'The Bible' miniseries scores huge ratings

History announced Monday (March 4) that “The Bible” premiere drew 13.1 viewers to its Sunday (March 3) premiere, and also did well in younger, advertiser-desired demographics. Combined with the premiere of the drama “Vikings,” the Sunday audience was the largest in History’s, um, history.

(my note, the ratings for the show beat all cable network programming, including the Walking Dead. I think the Vikings is more appealing... to me anyhow).

Didn't care for the Vikings series yet. I thought it moved a little slow. So far, the Bible series has moved a little slow as well. I think that has a little more bias though, since I didn't care too much for most the old testament.
 
http://www.nola.com/tv/index.ssf/2013/03/premiere_of_historys_the_bible.html

Premiere of History's 'The Bible' miniseries scores huge ratings

History announced Monday (March 4) that “The Bible” premiere drew 13.1 viewers to its Sunday (March 3) premiere, and also did well in younger, advertiser-desired demographics. Combined with the premiere of the drama “Vikings,” the Sunday audience was the largest in History’s, um, history.

(my note, the ratings for the show beat all cable network programming, including the Walking Dead. I think the Vikings is more appealing... to me anyhow).

Wasn't aware of Vikings. Thanks for the tip. Looks good.

Glad to see the History Channel produce real programming for a change. Breaking Bad, Mad Men and Walking Dead have really raised awareness that there's a real hunger for good television.
 
I didn't think so with him. He would have been a better devil. Although that German guy playing satan was pretty good


who, peter stormare? he's swedish.

yeah i always hoped there would be a Constantine sequel featuring more of him as satan vs. keanu since their one scene together was the best thing in the movie. not to be.
 
When was he in the Salvation Army?


Sorry about that. It was a bad play on my part. Something to do with a Walken SNL skit. ;)

[video=youtube;fZOHY7Z5eaQ]
 
Last edited:
who, peter stormare? he's swedish.

yeah i always hoped there would be a Constantine sequel featuring more of him as satan vs. keanu since their one scene together was the best thing in the movie. not to be.

If he is the same guy in Fargo and the big lebowski then yeah I agree.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top