The Blazers Player with the Most Trade Value is Lillard

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
SlyPokerDog said:
Wow, if I'm too mean people bitch, too nice people bitch, just have a little fun people bitch.

Kinda feeling like I'm not welcome around here anymore. Oh well, it happens.
Click to expand...

Nah, you're still FAMS. I love you Sly, dog (no pun on the name intended, really). Just feel like you toe the corporate line all the time (at least in your posts) so I gotta bust your chops.

I respect what you (gotta) do. Really. It's a tough spot.

But imma hammer you for it.
 
BLAZINGGIANTS said:
Nah, you're still FAMS. I love you Sly, dog (no pun on the name intended, really). Just feel like you toe the corporate line all the time (at least in your posts) so I gotta bust your chops.

I respect what you (gotta) do. Really. It's a tough spot.

But imma hammer you for it.
Click to expand...

But we did get some pretty cool new members since the merger.
 
I didnt read any comments but to trade Lillard a star now 2nd year playing def could be a superstar clutch as fuck has the pitbull in him and to trade him would be a discrace to the franchise he is our future and for a top pick that could bust !!!.??? Wtf is wrong with u
 
Zack95 said:
Why the fuck every post u make it says sly swaggers around like John Wayne . Sly is Han solo . It's getting fucking annoying !
Click to expand...

It's called a forum signature. They were before your time.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
I disagree but I will delete the posts and apologize.

I'm sorry for the <<<<<<<< posts. The premise of the original post that I was mocking didn't make sense with it so I decided to have some fun with it.
Click to expand...

That's what I was doing with the guarantee threads
 
Mediocre Man said:
That's what I was doing with the guarantee threads
Click to expand...

Stop, just stop. That's what I was talking about. For 5 mins I made 3 posts <<<<<<< and then that was it. I didn't do it or mention it again. You were on a 3 day rant that not only continued but it escalated. On day 3 after you were asked very nicely to stop and instead you melted down and started spamming by creating multiple threads. You can try to say those two incidents are the same but they're not. I know you'll never see that. I've already removed the posts and apologized a day ago.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
Stop, just stop. That's what I was talking about. For 5 mins I made 3 posts <<<<<<< and then that was it. I didn't do it or mention it again. You were on a 3 day rant that not only continued but it escalated. On day 3 after you were asked very nicely to stop and instead you melted down and started spamming by creating multiple threads. You can try to say those two incidents are the same but they're not. I know you'll never see that. I've already removed the posts and apologized a day ago.
Click to expand...

Technically I was asked when I started those threads, and stopped immediately upon seeing that I was asked. I was mocking a poster for his ridiculous statement, just as you were.
 
Mediocre Man said:
Technically I was asked when I started those threads, and stopped immediately upon seeing that I was asked. I was mocking a poster for his ridiculous statement, just as you were.
Click to expand...

To be fair, you started multiple threads.. he had a post(s) within a thread. One is seen more than the other.
 
Also, on the topic of members and having a ton... I don't know if I'd really like that, to be honest. I've been over on the Houston board and they can have a thread up and in 2 hours have 150-200 comments. No way in hell am I reading that. I like my threads to gradually gain posts... not look away for 5 minutes and be 3 pages behind. That's my view on it, at least.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top