OT The Civil Rights Lawyer

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Road Workers Assaulted by Drunk Driving Cop, then THEY were Arrested 10 days later

Posted on October 17, 2024

Road construction workers are facing felony assault and kidnapping charges after claiming they were the ones assaulted by a mystery driver. Even though the workers told the responding officers they believed the perpetrator was drunk, they let him drive away without a DUI investigation. It’s a secret case sealed by the courts, and authorities won’t say the name of that driver. As it turns out, the mystery driver was an off-duty police officer. Ten days after the incident, the workers were scheduled to have a TV news interview about the assault by the mystery off-duty cop. But instead, police officers arrested them prior to the interview.

Media report here.


 
Road Workers Assaulted by Drunk Driving Cop, then THEY were Arrested 10 days later

Posted on October 17, 2024

Road construction workers are facing felony assault and kidnapping charges after claiming they were the ones assaulted by a mystery driver. Even though the workers told the responding officers they believed the perpetrator was drunk, they let him drive away without a DUI investigation. It’s a secret case sealed by the courts, and authorities won’t say the name of that driver. As it turns out, the mystery driver was an off-duty police officer. Ten days after the incident, the workers were scheduled to have a TV news interview about the assault by the mystery off-duty cop. But instead, police officers arrested them prior to the interview.

Media report here.




Road workers arrested after claiming cop attacked them

ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Mo. – Contracted road workers say they are facing felony assault and kidnapping charges after claiming they were the ones assaulted by a mystery driver.

It’s a secret case sealed by the courts, and authorities won’t say the name of that driver, who turns out to have been an off-duty police officer. FOX 2 was trying to determine that driver’s identity when two of the road workers were arrested.

The incident happened in south county Thursday, Sept. 26, where road crews are repaving sections of Lindbergh.


The reported assault was at the corner of Lindbergh Boulevard and Lemay Ferry Road, where a left turn lane was coned off and there was a temporary sign in the middle of the road saying “no left turn” due to paving work. A safety worker said an angry driver assaulted him in that blocked lane, yet he was arrested right before our interview and charged as the aggressor.

23-year-old Garrett Gibbs was working for a different contractor nearby.

“I noticed the argument for probably 10 to 15 seconds, and then I noticed the door was open and the guy was outside his vehicle, and that’s pretty hefty—you know, a guy getting out of his vehicle in a work zone like somebody coming into your office and causing a problem,” Gibbs said. “He wanted to turn, and he kept saying that he was a police officer so he could make that turn.”


Gibbs snapped a picture of the driver’s car with a temp tag that appears to have expired a few days prior. The picture shows the car inside their work zone. You can see the “no left turn” sign to the right of the car.

“You know, in case this dude does something crazy, drives through the work zone, hits somebody…I’ve got something,” he added.

Allegedly, the off-duty officer “took a swing at one of the workers” when he missed him and hit Gibbs instead. He described he and two other workers holding the driver until police arrived.

“He caught me right in the mouth here,” Gibbs said.


Gibbs said arriving officers then, “cuffed him and proceeded to—we had to go back to work, but they proceeded to–talk to him in our work zone because this happened around 10:30 p.m. They kept him inside of our work zone until 3 a.m., whenever we picked it up.”

After four and a half hours waiting in that work zone, Gibbs said St. Louis County Police let the man drive off.

“I don’t believe he was breathalyzed. I don’t know if the car was searched or anything, so the police officers were informed that we believed he was drunk,” he said.

Police won’t say who that off-duty officer was—or if he was breathalyzed. Gibbs says he and his co-workers were never questioned.


Ten days after the incident, police arrested two of the workers—Matt Devlin and Donnie Hurley. They’re now charged with assault, kidnapping, and armed criminal action.

The record is sealed, despite the fact two road workers are now in the St. Louis County Justice Center facing decades in prison.

The employer for Gibbs and Devlin, N.B. West, wrote, “We are deeply concerned about the work zone incident that transpired on the evening of Sept. 26. In response, we initiated a comprehensive internal investigation to thoroughly understand the circumstances surrounding the events. Our commitment is unwavering to maintain a safe, respectful, and supportive work environment for all our employees and the traveling public.”

“Almost every day it seems like there’s a road worker getting killed,” Celeste Malick, wife of Devlin, said. “There’s all sorts of laws that (the officer) broke prior to the altercation even happening. You know he went through all the traffic cones, all the safety devices that these people put up; he went through them.”


Over the last week, she had been hoping to hear news about the mysterious driver.

FOX 2 sat in on the court appearances for the two defendants. Devlin is being held on a quarter of a million dollar cash-only bond, and Hurley is being held on $100,000 cash-only. They’ll each have bond reduction hearings on Oct. 15, which are court dates in which we expect to hear more details about the secretive charges.

https://fox2now.com/news/fox-files/road-workers-arrested-after-claiming-cop-attacked-them/
 
Road workers arrested after claiming cop attacked them

ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Mo. – Contracted road workers say they are facing felony assault and kidnapping charges after claiming they were the ones assaulted by a mystery driver.

It’s a secret case sealed by the courts, and authorities won’t say the name of that driver, who turns out to have been an off-duty police officer. FOX 2 was trying to determine that driver’s identity when two of the road workers were arrested.

The incident happened in south county Thursday, Sept. 26, where road crews are repaving sections of Lindbergh.


The reported assault was at the corner of Lindbergh Boulevard and Lemay Ferry Road, where a left turn lane was coned off and there was a temporary sign in the middle of the road saying “no left turn” due to paving work. A safety worker said an angry driver assaulted him in that blocked lane, yet he was arrested right before our interview and charged as the aggressor.

23-year-old Garrett Gibbs was working for a different contractor nearby.

“I noticed the argument for probably 10 to 15 seconds, and then I noticed the door was open and the guy was outside his vehicle, and that’s pretty hefty—you know, a guy getting out of his vehicle in a work zone like somebody coming into your office and causing a problem,” Gibbs said. “He wanted to turn, and he kept saying that he was a police officer so he could make that turn.”


Gibbs snapped a picture of the driver’s car with a temp tag that appears to have expired a few days prior. The picture shows the car inside their work zone. You can see the “no left turn” sign to the right of the car.

“You know, in case this dude does something crazy, drives through the work zone, hits somebody…I’ve got something,” he added.

Allegedly, the off-duty officer “took a swing at one of the workers” when he missed him and hit Gibbs instead. He described he and two other workers holding the driver until police arrived.

“He caught me right in the mouth here,” Gibbs said.


Gibbs said arriving officers then, “cuffed him and proceeded to—we had to go back to work, but they proceeded to–talk to him in our work zone because this happened around 10:30 p.m. They kept him inside of our work zone until 3 a.m., whenever we picked it up.”

After four and a half hours waiting in that work zone, Gibbs said St. Louis County Police let the man drive off.

“I don’t believe he was breathalyzed. I don’t know if the car was searched or anything, so the police officers were informed that we believed he was drunk,” he said.

Police won’t say who that off-duty officer was—or if he was breathalyzed. Gibbs says he and his co-workers were never questioned.


Ten days after the incident, police arrested two of the workers—Matt Devlin and Donnie Hurley. They’re now charged with assault, kidnapping, and armed criminal action.

The record is sealed, despite the fact two road workers are now in the St. Louis County Justice Center facing decades in prison.

The employer for Gibbs and Devlin, N.B. West, wrote, “We are deeply concerned about the work zone incident that transpired on the evening of Sept. 26. In response, we initiated a comprehensive internal investigation to thoroughly understand the circumstances surrounding the events. Our commitment is unwavering to maintain a safe, respectful, and supportive work environment for all our employees and the traveling public.”

“Almost every day it seems like there’s a road worker getting killed,” Celeste Malick, wife of Devlin, said. “There’s all sorts of laws that (the officer) broke prior to the altercation even happening. You know he went through all the traffic cones, all the safety devices that these people put up; he went through them.”


Over the last week, she had been hoping to hear news about the mysterious driver.

FOX 2 sat in on the court appearances for the two defendants. Devlin is being held on a quarter of a million dollar cash-only bond, and Hurley is being held on $100,000 cash-only. They’ll each have bond reduction hearings on Oct. 15, which are court dates in which we expect to hear more details about the secretive charges.

https://fox2now.com/news/fox-files/road-workers-arrested-after-claiming-cop-attacked-them/
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/c...ficer/63-920ea098-43e7-407c-972e-5976854e4a41

ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Mo. — Police shared new details Tuesday afternoon about a case involving three construction workers charged with assaulting and kidnapping an off-duty St. Louis County police officer in September.

Matthew Devlin, Garrett Gibbs, and Donnie Hurley II are each facing charges of first-degree assault, armed criminal action and kidnapping.

All three men appeared in court Tuesday for bond reduction hearings.

Devlin is being held on $250,000 cash only, no 10%, bond; Gibbs and Hurley are being held on $100,000 cash only, no 10%, bond.

On Tuesday, their defense attorneys asked for these reductions:

Devlin’s attorney asked for $50,000 bond with 10%
Gibbs’ attorney asked for $25,000 bond with 10%
Hurley's attorney asked for $20,000 bond with 10%
Late Tuesday afternoon, 5 On Your Side learned a judge decided there will be no modification to their bond.

In the latest update from the investigation, police said officers first responded on the night of Sept. 26 on South Lindbergh Boulevard and Lemay Ferry Road when a caller told them a drunk man, who was Black, was being held down by others, who were white.

Officers arrived and placed the man in handcuffs, but they say after 10 minutes, it was determined he was not the initial aggressor.

They also gave him a field sobriety test, which he passed.

Meanwhile, as police investigated the case in the days ahead, they said they determined the off-duty officer was actually the victim.

Police added the off-duty officer was driving in an unmarked car and in plain clothes.

Witnesses said Devlin used racial slurs while screaming at the victim. He said the officer did not "belong down here" and "go back to the hood with your gold chain," according to charging documents.

Police said Devlin then struck the man on the head with a hardhat. They said this led to Gibbs and Hurley holding the officer down while Devlin kept hitting him with the hardhat.

Defense attorneys questioned the details of the case in court, saying the off-duty officer was the instigator.

Devlin is being represented by John Rogers, who said his client was doing nothing more than working that night when an off-duty officer pulled up to the marked work zone and stopped the workers.


Rogers told the judge it was the off-duty officer who was aggressive and threw the first punch at Gibbs.

Scott Rosenblum's office is representing Garrett Gibbs. In court, Gibbs' attorney said Gibbs saw the fight and went over to take a picture of the man's license plate when he was punched. A fight followed.

Hurley is represented by Bradley Dede. Dede told the judge his client was eager to get back to work and his employee is in high demand, which is inconsistent with the charges.

Hurley and Gibbs are still employed with the same company. Rogers said his client, Devlin, was not.

Rogers told 5 On Your Side, "There was some language that is reportedly used that no one should be proud of, but in this particular case, it had nothing to do with what should be a legitimate police investigation of bad acts by an off-duty member of the St. Louis County Police Department."

5 On Your Side asked Rogers about the alleged racist language used.

He responded, "I'm not confirming that any poor language was used. I will say in no civilized society are racial slurs appropriate. It's also not appropriate for law enforcement to pull on to construction zones, pull out their badge, (and) jeopardize the safety of construction workers. It's a red herring."

Rogers called the kidnapping charge "bizarre" saying they were detaining an individual while the construction company called law enforcement.

Rogers added, "This is a case of prosecutors looking out for police officers who are conducting investigations of other police officers."

He said the case overall was "overcharged" and added, "This prosecution is overly zealous."

Rosenblum spoke to 5 On Your Side following the hearings. He said his client was hanging in there and anxious to get out of jail.

"As the course of the case unfolds, we’ll enter a 'not guilty' in the earliest court date as we can and present this case to a jury," Rosenblum added. "Everything will play out in front of a jury at some point in time."


Multiple other organizations, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), have joined the NAACP in calling this a racially-motivated incident.

CAIR, along with other organizations, is calling on state and federal law enforcement authorities to investigate this case as a hate crime.

CAIR's spokesperson Ibrahim Hooper said, "It's something we urge anytime there's a case like this, that everyone speak out, because when it's just one group or one minority community speaking out, there's less of an impact. But when everybody speaks out, then you can have some real change."

A St. Louis County spokesperson also shared this information: "Detectives and the Prosecuting Attorney discussed the application of Missouri State Statute 557.035 - Hate Offenses, however, it was determined it could not be applied as an enhancement to the charges issued per the requirements of the statute."

The officer was placed in an administrative role within the police department immediately following the incident. He has since returned to his full patrol duties.

The next court date for all three men is a preliminary hearing set for Oct. 28.
 
My grandfather was a truck driver for years. Like 50 years.

Probably around 2005. He had an off-duty police officer in his jacked up 4x4 rear-end his trailer on I-5 North heading to Seattle.

The truck hit the ramps on the back of my grandfather's car hauler and severed the front axle completely from the truck.

Luckily the cops who came to the scene of the accident spent quite a bit of time looking around and informed my grandfather that they weren't going to press any charges against him that day... So that was good...

Didn't realize how lucky he was.
 
Last edited:
Ignorant Cops Harass Veteran Over Cardboard Sign | Enforce Law Held Unconstitutional in 2019!
Posted on October 23, 2024

Cops in Little Rock, Arkansas harass a veteran holding a cardboard sign that reads, “God Bless Our Homeless Vets.” The veteran happens to be Jeff Gray, a YouTuber and legendary First Amendment activist. Like moths to the flame….

 
Cops Tased Autistic Son – After Making Him Participate in Father’s Arrest! (then lied about it)

Posted on October 31, 2024

A Peruvian family who resides in Bradenton, Florida, was pulled over by the Holmes Beach Police Department after an automated license plate reader flagged the vehicle’s plate as possibly being driven by someone without a valid license. The driver was Orlando Diaz, who spoke very little English. The officer asked his son, who is autistic, to translate. The officer then proceeded to have the son translate to his father that he was under arrest, rather than being given a citation. The son became quickly and visibly upset after seeing his father being placed in handcuffs. Shortly afterwards, the father would be thrown on the ground and the autistic son, Francisco Diaz, would also be thrown on the ground and tased several times.



https://www.gofundme.com/f/uwfz6-justice-for-francisco-diaz-help-us-fight
 
11 Crooked Cops Busted by 1 Video | Police Chief Resigns | Officer Indicted

Posted on November 3, 2024

All hell has broken loose within the Kissimmee (Florida) Police Department. A single bodycam video showing former Officer Andrew Baseggio entering a man’s home, without a warrant, and inflicting violence on him inside his living room, has resulted in Officer Baseggio getting indicted, which has in turn taken down 10 other police officers in that department (including the police chief), found by a grand jury to have lied in an effort to coverup Baseggio’s misconduct from investigators.


 
Bully Cop Assaults Special Olympics Medalist (and his supervisor helps cover it up)
Posted on November 17, 2024

In Clearfield, Utah, Officer Fratto of the Clearfield Police Department violently arrested (and injured) a local long-time Special Olympics medalist. Shawn was just trying to walk home from his favorite karaoke bar, but Officer Fratto thought Shawn looked suspicious, so he began to follow him (and scare him) as he was walking home. Shawn had committed no crime. No crime had been observed or reported.

Fratto eventually jumped out of his police cruiser and detained Shawn, claiming he saw him illegally jaywalk. He demanded Shawn provide his “ID.” However, Shawn answered all questions asked by Fratto, who never asked Shawn his name or date of birth. Shawn knew that he was being harassed and did not want to provide his ID to Fratto, who continue to bully him and escalate the situation. Fratto chose violence and took Shawn to the ground, injuring him. Fratto’s supervisor showed up and helped coverup the misconduct.

Luckily, Shawn had a friend from the bar who helped him get the bodycam footage and communicate to the prosecutor and judge in court, resulting in the bogus charge being dismissed. But unfortunately, the incident has had a lasting negative effect on Shawn.

 
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/c...ficer/63-920ea098-43e7-407c-972e-5976854e4a41

ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Mo. — Police shared new details Tuesday afternoon about a case involving three construction workers charged with assaulting and kidnapping an off-duty St. Louis County police officer in September.

Matthew Devlin, Garrett Gibbs, and Donnie Hurley II are each facing charges of first-degree assault, armed criminal action and kidnapping.

All three men appeared in court Tuesday for bond reduction hearings.

Devlin is being held on $250,000 cash only, no 10%, bond; Gibbs and Hurley are being held on $100,000 cash only, no 10%, bond.

On Tuesday, their defense attorneys asked for these reductions:

Devlin’s attorney asked for $50,000 bond with 10%
Gibbs’ attorney asked for $25,000 bond with 10%
Hurley's attorney asked for $20,000 bond with 10%
Late Tuesday afternoon, 5 On Your Side learned a judge decided there will be no modification to their bond.

In the latest update from the investigation, police said officers first responded on the night of Sept. 26 on South Lindbergh Boulevard and Lemay Ferry Road when a caller told them a drunk man, who was Black, was being held down by others, who were white.

Officers arrived and placed the man in handcuffs, but they say after 10 minutes, it was determined he was not the initial aggressor.

They also gave him a field sobriety test, which he passed.

Meanwhile, as police investigated the case in the days ahead, they said they determined the off-duty officer was actually the victim.

Police added the off-duty officer was driving in an unmarked car and in plain clothes.

Witnesses said Devlin used racial slurs while screaming at the victim. He said the officer did not "belong down here" and "go back to the hood with your gold chain," according to charging documents.

Police said Devlin then struck the man on the head with a hardhat. They said this led to Gibbs and Hurley holding the officer down while Devlin kept hitting him with the hardhat.

Defense attorneys questioned the details of the case in court, saying the off-duty officer was the instigator.

Devlin is being represented by John Rogers, who said his client was doing nothing more than working that night when an off-duty officer pulled up to the marked work zone and stopped the workers.


Rogers told the judge it was the off-duty officer who was aggressive and threw the first punch at Gibbs.

Scott Rosenblum's office is representing Garrett Gibbs. In court, Gibbs' attorney said Gibbs saw the fight and went over to take a picture of the man's license plate when he was punched. A fight followed.

Hurley is represented by Bradley Dede. Dede told the judge his client was eager to get back to work and his employee is in high demand, which is inconsistent with the charges.

Hurley and Gibbs are still employed with the same company. Rogers said his client, Devlin, was not.

Rogers told 5 On Your Side, "There was some language that is reportedly used that no one should be proud of, but in this particular case, it had nothing to do with what should be a legitimate police investigation of bad acts by an off-duty member of the St. Louis County Police Department."

5 On Your Side asked Rogers about the alleged racist language used.

He responded, "I'm not confirming that any poor language was used. I will say in no civilized society are racial slurs appropriate. It's also not appropriate for law enforcement to pull on to construction zones, pull out their badge, (and) jeopardize the safety of construction workers. It's a red herring."

Rogers called the kidnapping charge "bizarre" saying they were detaining an individual while the construction company called law enforcement.

Rogers added, "This is a case of prosecutors looking out for police officers who are conducting investigations of other police officers."

He said the case overall was "overcharged" and added, "This prosecution is overly zealous."

Rosenblum spoke to 5 On Your Side following the hearings. He said his client was hanging in there and anxious to get out of jail.

"As the course of the case unfolds, we’ll enter a 'not guilty' in the earliest court date as we can and present this case to a jury," Rosenblum added. "Everything will play out in front of a jury at some point in time."


Multiple other organizations, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), have joined the NAACP in calling this a racially-motivated incident.

CAIR, along with other organizations, is calling on state and federal law enforcement authorities to investigate this case as a hate crime.

CAIR's spokesperson Ibrahim Hooper said, "It's something we urge anytime there's a case like this, that everyone speak out, because when it's just one group or one minority community speaking out, there's less of an impact. But when everybody speaks out, then you can have some real change."

A St. Louis County spokesperson also shared this information: "Detectives and the Prosecuting Attorney discussed the application of Missouri State Statute 557.035 - Hate Offenses, however, it was determined it could not be applied as an enhancement to the charges issued per the requirements of the statute."

The officer was placed in an administrative role within the police department immediately following the incident. He has since returned to his full patrol duties.

The next court date for all three men is a preliminary hearing set for Oct. 28.

I never knew they could take away the 10% bond condition.

I mean, I've seen murderers get a 500,000 bond and get out on 10%. So, sounds like it's subjective... or, when cops are "involved" (i.e. should have been charged).
 
Bully Cop Assaults Special Olympics Medalist (and his supervisor helps cover it up)
Posted on November 17, 2024

In Clearfield, Utah, Officer Fratto of the Clearfield Police Department violently arrested (and injured) a local long-time Special Olympics medalist. Shawn was just trying to walk home from his favorite karaoke bar, but Officer Fratto thought Shawn looked suspicious, so he began to follow him (and scare him) as he was walking home. Shawn had committed no crime. No crime had been observed or reported.

Fratto eventually jumped out of his police cruiser and detained Shawn, claiming he saw him illegally jaywalk. He demanded Shawn provide his “ID.” However, Shawn answered all questions asked by Fratto, who never asked Shawn his name or date of birth. Shawn knew that he was being harassed and did not want to provide his ID to Fratto, who continue to bully him and escalate the situation. Fratto chose violence and took Shawn to the ground, injuring him. Fratto’s supervisor showed up and helped coverup the misconduct.

Luckily, Shawn had a friend from the bar who helped him get the bodycam footage and communicate to the prosecutor and judge in court, resulting in the bogus charge being dismissed. But unfortunately, the incident has had a lasting negative effect on Shawn.



 
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/police-selling-restricted-guns-posties/

Adair, Iowa, had a population of 794. So, it seemed suspicious when its three-person police department asked regulators to buy 90 machine guns, including an M134 Gatling-style minigun capable of shooting up to 6,000 rounds of ammunition every minute.

Federal agents later discovered Adair's police chief, Bradley Wendt, was using his position to acquire weapons and sell them for personal profit. A jury convicted Wendt earlier this year of conspiracy to defraud the United States, lying to federal law enforcement and illegal possession of a machine gun. Wendt is unapologetic and has appealed his conviction.

"If I'm guilty of this, every cop in the nation's going to jail," Wendt told CBS News just days before a federal judge sentenced him to a 5-year prison term. Wendt's crimes appear to be part of a nationwide pattern.
 
Cops Find Missing Veteran with Alzheimer’s (then punch him unconscious)

Posted on December 31, 2024

George Henderson spent 29 years serving in the military with 6 overseas deployments. He retired in 2018 after his head injuries and PTSD began to worsen. He was then diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, which led to him going missing on December 6. The State of Tennessee issued a Silver Alert. Mr. Henderson was located a day later, 10 miles away, in nearby Guthrie, Kentucky. Unfortunately, when that happened, a Guthrie police officer punched him unconscious. They have circled their law enforcement wagons, claim no wrongdoing, and apparently continue to prosecute this American hero.

 
I posted in the "rock bottom" thread about my recent journey into the legal system, but I figured some observations were better made here.

The Civil Rights Lawyer talks about how "freedom is scary, deal with it." Well, I'm going to let you know just how scary it can be.

Keep in mind, this is all perfectly legal. Unlike a lot of people in these videos, no one is getting hurt or dying. Police, prosecutors and judges can do the following and it's not violating your Constitutional rights for them to do it.

I was arrested and charged with stalking and harassment for leaving a sympathy card. I didn't see the person for whom I left the card. The last time we had contact was three years ago, and that was an email I sent them for graduating from college. BTW, I got them into college, which got them the degree they used to get the job at the place where I left them the card.

An element for both stalking and harassment, at least here in Pennsylvania, is what they call "course of conduct." It means there have to be repeated acts intended to make someone reasonably fear bodily injury or experience extreme emotional distress. The statute of limitations for both of those crimes is two years.

The police officer that made the investigation and the arrest knew this, and you'd think would have been enough to end it right there. After all, in a jury trial, the state is supposed to have to be able to prove all elements of the charge to get a conviction -- that's not really true, either, but I'll get to that. Anyway, the officer isn't bound by the legal code. They aren't required to talk to the accused or even to confirm the accuser's report. In my case, several aspects of the report could have been dismissed with a phone call to either me or certain third parties.

The officer isn't required to do that, though, to file for an arrest warrant. And, because of qualified immunity, the officer is largely shielded from punishment for being overzealous in getting an arrest.

The officer that arrested me was at the very same time on civil trial for a false arrest when he cuffed a middle-aged woman driving a truck pulling a trailer with hay to an animal rescue on a rainy night on the suspicion of being on meth. She was taken to the hospital and forced to undergo an involuntary blood test ... which showed she was clean. Even the broken tail light for which he pulled her over in the first place apparently wasn't broken. He settled with an arbiter in October but still is on the job, and he arrested someone else on the suspicion of being meth again within a day or two. Oh, and the woman that was arrested? A story on her arrest went into the local paper and it took six months for them to note in the story online that she passed her bloodtest, no correction or story or anything.

The fiancee of the officer that arrested me went to school with the person who accused me. To get an arrest warrant, they went to a magistrate who grew up with the complaintant's mother. The magistrate that handled the prearraignment oversaw the complaintant's college internship; he kept pushing me to have a public defender who works in the same building as the prosecutor to handle my defense. I think the magistrate that presided over the preliminary hearing had a prior relationship with the accuser -- he heard the complaintant admit everything they said to get an arrest report either was wrong, false, or a mistake ... and they still moved the case to a trial.

There isn't anything for Pennsylvania residents to do for something like a district judge overseeing a proceeding in which a friend is involved on either side. A complaint could be filed, but that might get a letter of reprimand, but nothing else.

The trial judge in my case worked with the complaintant almost every day for more than two years. A judge is supposed to recuse themselves from cases where they have a relationship with the complaintant or defendant. He didn't. When they don't, you can file a motion ... which is ruled upon by the judge you're trying to get off your case. This judge will decide all motions, will rule on all objections, will decide what is admissable, will give the jury instructions before deliberation and would be the one to rule if they didn't think the jury's verdict was correct.

When a judge might be partisan -- even if it's done subconsciously -- doesn't recuse themself from a case, it is grounds for an appeal. However, you still have to go through the case and spend all the money that goes along with it. If you win the appeal, you don't win your case. You just start over.

The judge in my case had the complaintant introduce her new fiance to the court at the pretrial, even though he had nothing at all to do with the case. Gee, wonder what that was about.

You can't sue a judge in Pennsylvania, though. He can do whatever he wants and there's nothing you can do.

The DA is friends with the complaintant, and during the early part of the process was liking her bikini pics on social media. The arresting officer asked me not to hold this against him because "I have to do what the DA tells me to do."

You can't sue a district attorney in Pennsylvania, though. You can file a complaint. Nothing more.

As the Civil Rights Lawyer makes clear, the police don't have to be honest with someone they're investigating or arresting. They can lie to get whatever they want.

In my case, they took my phone. They had every text I ever sent, my direct message history, all of it. And they didn't need to prove a thing to get it. They just needed a magistrate to sign a warrant or just to take it without a warrant and say I let them have it.

The officer made me dress in front of him to be taken to prearraignment. What was the purpose of that? Your guess is as good as mine.

If I went to a jury trial, the prosecution is supposed to have to prove all elements of the alleged crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Any good attorney will tell you that's not true. You're at the mercy of whatever 12 people decide and then the judge can accept or reject their decision, whether it's proper or not. My attorney told me they didn't have a case, but he also said you can't predict what a jury will do, and he's seen it work both ways. He's a former prosecutor. He said he didn't expect the prosecution to argue the illegality of what I did, but to take a small piece of one bit of evidence out of context and try to use that and the fact that I talked to friends -- not even in a negative way -- about the complaintant to make me look like a bad guy and get the jury to convict me based on that. The complaintant herself didn't even say what they were going to try to say, but they aren't under any obligation to act in the interest or guides of the law to win their case.

On the first day my attorney met with the DAs, the state offered to drop the stalking completely and reduce the harassment to the much lesser charge of disorderly conduct. After the preliminary hearing and despite having everything they could get from my phone, they even reduced that before pretrial, even with a judge that appeared to be in their corner -- he wanted to allow the complaintant to testify over the phone when she lied and said she couldn't be at the pretrial hearing (surprisingly, she had no problem being there when she found out she didn't need to testify).

With no prior record, I still was facing more than a decade in prison and tens of thousands of dollars in fines if I went to trial and lost. The prosecution offered probation and court costs, and I took that.

However, in taking that, I also apparently lost any chance to bring civil action against anyone, even though the crime I pleaded to was completely different than what they overcharged me with. A civil attorney that has won a bunch of cases against the people that did this to me said my chance of winning a civil case was small anyway, because, in the U.S., even though filing a false police report, malicious prosecution and conspiracy are against the law, proving them is next to impossible.

TL;DR The legal system in the U.S. is as messed up as the healthcare system. It's for profit and the idea isn't to find justice but to get people into the system, along with their money. And there's not a lot anyone can do to get relief from them or make them accountable if they decide to screw with your life.
 
I didn't even mention that the complaintant and her family tried to make contact with me and get me to do things during the process that either were intended to harass me or would have violated my bail if I reacted to it. I got crank calls. I was attacked by fake social media accounts that seemed likely to be her.

The local newspaper wrote three stories about my case. They never tried to contact me or my attorney. They didn't attend the public preliminary hearing where they would have heard the accuser invalidate everything that got the arrest warrant. Then they screwed up the headline on my plea agreement and said I pleaded to harassment, which had people spamming my Facebook account on Christmas Day. Pretty reckless, right? Well, getting defamation against a news outlet is almost as hard as winning a case against the police.

In addition to my expenses in my defense, I lost my job just on what was in the later disproven police report, and I probably won't ever get hired back because stalking was attached to my name, even though there never was stalking.

All that happened over a sympathy card. That's your justice system at work. That's what people in that county pay their taxes to see pursued.
 
I didn't even mention that the complaintant and her family tried to make contact with me and get me to do things during the process that either were intended to harass me or would have violated my bail if I reacted to it. I got crank calls. I was attacked by fake social media accounts that seemed likely to be her.

The local newspaper wrote three stories about my case. They never tried to contact me or my attorney. They didn't attend the public preliminary hearing where they would have heard the accuser invalidate everything that got the arrest warrant. Then they screwed up the headline on my plea agreement and said I pleaded to harassment, which had people spamming my Facebook account on Christmas Day. Pretty reckless, right? Well, getting defamation against a news outlet is almost as hard as winning a case against the police.

In addition to my expenses in my defense, I lost my job just on what was in the later disproven police report, and I probably won't ever get hired back because stalking was attached to my name, even though there never was stalking.

All that happened over a sympathy card. That's your justice system at work. That's what people in that county pay their taxes to see pursued.
Is this the "great" America we're trying to get back too? Asking for a friend.......and to be honest, I grew up in a very social justice atmosphere and it was made very clear to me at a very young age that justice in America almost always goes to the highest bidder. The exceptions are few and far between. Donald Trump is a classic example of an American getting away with absolutely anything if you have enough money.......
 
I didn't even mention that the complaintant and her family tried to make contact with me and get me to do things during the process that either were intended to harass me or would have violated my bail if I reacted to it. I got crank calls. I was attacked by fake social media accounts that seemed likely to be her.

The local newspaper wrote three stories about my case. They never tried to contact me or my attorney. They didn't attend the public preliminary hearing where they would have heard the accuser invalidate everything that got the arrest warrant. Then they screwed up the headline on my plea agreement and said I pleaded to harassment, which had people spamming my Facebook account on Christmas Day. Pretty reckless, right? Well, getting defamation against a news outlet is almost as hard as winning a case against the police.

In addition to my expenses in my defense, I lost my job just on what was in the later disproven police report, and I probably won't ever get hired back because stalking was attached to my name, even though there never was stalking.

All that happened over a sympathy card. That's your justice system at work. That's what people in that county pay their taxes to see pursued.
I liked your post, but I wish I could have "disliked" it in support.

This is not right and it should not be happening.
 


Innocent Man Dead after Cops Raid Wrong House Looking for Judge’s Missing Weedeater

Posted on January 3, 2025

An innocent Kentucky man was shot dead by the London, Kentucky police after they raided the wrong house, surprising him at night during an impromptu search warrant execution, looking for a “Judge’s” missing weedeater. So far, authorities have released almost no information. But here’s what we do know so far, and it doesn’t look good at all…



upload_2025-1-5_14-58-35.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-1-5_14-58-35.png
    upload_2025-1-5_14-58-35.png
    52.5 KB · Views: 83


Innocent Man Dead after Cops Raid Wrong House Looking for Judge’s Missing Weedeater

Posted on January 3, 2025

An innocent Kentucky man was shot dead by the London, Kentucky police after they raided the wrong house, surprising him at night during an impromptu search warrant execution, looking for a “Judge’s” missing weedeater. So far, authorities have released almost no information. But here’s what we do know so far, and it doesn’t look good at all…



View attachment 69463




 


Innocent Man Dead after Cops Raid Wrong House Looking for Judge’s Missing Weedeater

Posted on January 3, 2025

An innocent Kentucky man was shot dead by the London, Kentucky police after they raided the wrong house, surprising him at night during an impromptu search warrant execution, looking for a “Judge’s” missing weedeater. So far, authorities have released almost no information. But here’s what we do know so far, and it doesn’t look good at all…



View attachment 69463


 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top