- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 26,226
- Likes
- 14,407
- Points
- 113
To whom exactly are you referring to when you say, "you guys"?
You know who you people are.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To whom exactly are you referring to when you say, "you guys"?
Literally nothing is knowable, outside of mathematics. All we have is levels of sure-ity. Based on his having produced a legally recognized form of birth certificate, the announcement in local newspaper of his birth and things like that, I am quite sure he was born in Hawaii.
If you're willing to believe it's possible that fake birth announcements were created for a Kenyan newborn, how would you know that the state of Hawaii didn't create a fake birth certificate on his behalf?
Ok, wait. Start over.
What is the proof that Obama was born in Hawaii?
1) A Certification of Live Birth issued by the State of Hawaii.
2) Two birth announcements in Honolulu newspapers.
Am I missing something?
Nope. Sounds good to me. A birth certificate and reports at the time. Not proof (as again, outside mathematics, nothing is provable) but enough evidence, to me, to make it extremely implausible that he was born elsewhere.
I am not sure I follow.When I moved to Hawaii in 2000, people in lots of places on the islands still had party lines for phones. Literally like Green Acres with a phone on a phone poll within a mile of the house. I knew a few of the state senators. They had a secretary as their entire staff.
In ~1960, when Obama was born, the place had just become a state and was so backwards compared to the rest of the states. I wouldn't expect them to have good records going back then.
I am not sure I follow.
A State of Hawaii official in a press conference announced that they inspected the actual birth certificate document. So that record exists if you believe the state official.
No. Not the birth certificate. A "Certification of Live Birth". Which is a document constructed on demand from data stored in a digital database.
As "proof" of how adequate it is, you claim that since no amount of proof will ever be enough to "prove" the issue, we should stop at what we have.
You are shooting down, what I consider very reasonable requests for more evidence
I read it.
Note that they're quoting that it's been the same since the 80s. Was Obama born in the 1980s? He was born in 1961.
Also note that it's what Hawaii releases when someone requests a copy of the birth certificate. Why doesn't Hawaii release the original copy? It's the way Hawaii does things, but that still doesn't answer a simple question. They have his original birth certificate. Why not head down to a copy machine and end the discussion? I have no doubt that a birth certificate in the State of New Jersey looks different now than it did when I was born there. If someone wanted to see my original birth certificate, the State of New Jersey would have a copy of one created the day I was born.
Right. One which is generally considered functionally equivalent to a birth certificate if the parents' names are present, as they are on Obama's.
But in order to get one online, DHS demands I show a passport or driver's license. I have no passport and my ODL was expired and confiscated by DMV. To get a passport....
No, I'm not. As I told maxiep, I don't think it would be a bad thing if Obama released it, nor do I care if he does or does not. In no way does that constitute "shooting down." I haven't rendered judgment, either, on whether the request is "reasonable" or not.
The only judgment I've made is to say that those who don't think Obama was born in Hawaii are a bit nuts. In my opinion, there is enough evidence for me to make that judgment on "birthers."

I find it a bit fun that there's a 170-ish post thread about the "Final Word" of the issue.
Denny's raking in the dough!
The Obama Apolgists like Minstrel seem to go to great lengths to continually and define what is really as simple argument, with a simple solution.

I think you're a little confused. I don't care one way or the other whether he releases it, as I've noted a couple of times. If that makes me an apologist, I guess the vast majority of the nation are Obama Apologists.
Which doesn't bode well for you birthers.![]()
Obama Job Approval at 41%, Tying His Low
PRINCETON, NJ - The latest Gallup Daily tracking three-day average shows 41% of Americans approving of the job Barack Obama is doing as president. That ties his low as president, which he registered three times previously -- twice in August 2010 and once in October 2010.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/147140/Obama-Job-Approval-Tying-Low.aspx
Could there be some correlation between Barry's continued lack of transparency and how it affects public opinion?
The final words should be RELEASE IT.
It's as simple as that. The leader of the supposed free world could end this by just releasing his true BC from the hospital. The Obama Apolgists like Minstrel seem to go to great lengths to continually and define what is really as simple argument, with a simple solution.
And exactly how would he do that since he doesn't have it? And would it suprise you that it is against the law for him to walk into the hospital and get it? That would be pretty cool if you could walk into a hospital and walk off with your original birth certificate. Oh wait... that would be a bad idea wouldn't it?

OMG! Obama is a muslim jihadist in disguise!
![]()

The fact that he won't deny it makes me suspect he is.![]()
Wouldn't cheddar melt on vacation in Hawaii, or at least spoil? Isn't that proof enough.
