The Gary Johnson thread

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Heck, it might help him - what he needs most is attention, and maybe bad press is better than no press at this point.

barfo
 
Or maybe he's less likely to go bomb or order drone strikes on a place he doesn't care about.
 
Or maybe he's less likely to go bomb or order drone strikes on a place he doesn't care about.

I'm not sure not giving a shit about the outside world is a really great qualification for president. Bombing might not be a good idea, but ignorance isn't a solution.

Personally, I'm willing to give him credit for knowing something about Syria and caring at least somewhat. You seem to have a low opinion of your Johnson.

barfo
 
I've never heard of Gary Johnson until today. I heard radio commercials during the Dan Patrick show. Might have to look into him, can't possibly be any worse than our current choices.
 
I'm not sure not giving a shit about the outside world is a really great qualification for president. Bombing might not be a good idea, but ignorance isn't a solution.

Personally, I'm willing to give him credit for knowing something about Syria and caring at least somewhat. You seem to have a low opinion of your Johnson.

barfo

Oddly, Aleppo isn't on CNN much, if at all. Instead, it's a 24/7 Hiliar political commercial.

What do you know about Aleppo?
 
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/09/what-is-aleppo-syria/499142/

Gary Johnson, the Libertarian Party’s nominee for president of the United States, is being mercilessly ridiculed for asking what Aleppo was when Morning Joe host Mike Barnicle mentioned the Syrian city on Thursday morning. But I’m grateful to Johnson. Many politicians in that situation would pretend they were familiar with Aleppo and then pivot to a more comfortable topic. (“Aleppo is, of course, a very serious issue that as president I would seek to address. But I gotta say: My top priority would be stopping wasteful government spending. That’s really the greatest threat to our national security,” etc.)

As a candidate for America’s highest office, Johnson should know what Aleppo is. But he’s certainly not alone in not knowing. And had he not asked the question,#WhatIsAleppo wouldn’t be trending on Twitter. BuzzFeed wouldn’t be asking its readers to find Aleppo on a map. People might not be discussing how Matt Lauer barely brought up Syria during NBC’s Commander in Chief Forum on Wednesday. We wouldn’t be talking as much about something we should be talking about more: the epicenter of Syria’s civil war and humanitarian crisis.

(why barely ask about Syria? That's one of the more Obama/Clinton foreign policy failures)
 
Oddly, Aleppo isn't on CNN much, if at all. Instead, it's a 24/7 Hiliar political commercial.

What do you know about Aleppo?

Not a huge amount. I know it's a city in Syria, I know that Assad and others have been bombing the shit out of it, I've seen lots of pictures of rubble and bloody children. Beyond that - nothing.

But then, I'm not running for president, am I? It's not my job to know shit like that.

After seeing the clips of Johnson, and then the video of him later trying and failing to explain, it now seems worse for him than it did when I'd just read the text of the exchange. He really did look stoned, and the later bit taken by an escalator, he couldn't even make sense. Don't know how many people will see that, of course, so it probably still doesn't matter.

barfo
 
Not a huge amount. I know it's a city in Syria, I know that Assad and others have been bombing the shit out of it, I've seen lots of pictures of rubble and bloody children. Beyond that - nothing.

barfo

Your candidate's foreign policy in action. The Nobel peace prize winner's, too.
 
I don't care if Johnson doesn't know where Washington DC is. He's still better than those other two craphounds.

Not to say that I'm voting for him. I already promised to write in Weird Al Yankovic.
 
Many politicians in that situation would pretend they were familiar with Aleppo and then pivot to a more comfortable topic. (“Aleppo is, of course, a very serious issue that as president I would seek to address. But I gotta say: My top priority would be stopping wasteful government spending. That’s really the greatest threat to our national security,” etc.)

The funny part is that that "quote" is indeed exactly the sort of thing a Libertarian would say. And it's stupider than saying "What's Aleppo?".

barfo
 
For you Gary Johnson fans, here you go.



You sure this is the guy you want?

barfo
 
The funny part is that that "quote" is indeed exactly the sort of thing a Libertarian would say. And it's stupider than saying "What's Aleppo?".

barfo

That quote isn't what he said.

It's the lefty writer's fantasy.
 
I've never understood the love for government, no matter the cost.

I don't know many Libertarians who are anarchists. Libertarianism is, in fact, a legal philosophy. There most certainly is a role for government, ideally, but it should not cause harm to some for the benefit of others. There are laws against crimes, and civil courts to resolve disputes.

The two parties have become so polarized that neither one truly represents the will of the people. The polls say the country is going in the wrong direction. The polls say the people want what the Libertarians offer, but they don't get to hear from the Libertarians proper. That is, fiscal responsibility and social freedoms.

Johnson is at 8.9% today. He has been in the ~7% range until the past few weeks. He's polling over 10% in several of the higher profile polls, and 9% in several others.

View attachment 9999

It's remarkable that we might elect a president with 42.3% of the popular vote. Not all that popular, really.
Isn't that about what Bill Clinton got when Ross Perot ran?
 
For you Gary Johnson fans, here you go.



You sure this is the guy you want?

barfo


Sounds like a guy who doesn't want to be in Syria in the first place. Hillary wants to create a no fly zone (bomb them to shit) while Russian forces are on the ground. As the election draws near I'm leaning more and more his way. Jill Stein has been off her rocker lately.
 
Sounds like a guy who doesn't want to be in Syria in the first place. Hillary wants to create a no fly zone (bomb them to shit) while Russian forces are on the ground. As the election draws near I'm leaning more and more his way. Jill Stein has been off her rocker lately.

Oh, I don't know. Getting busted for vandalism is what we expect from our president, no?

barfo
 
Isn't that about what Bill Clinton got when Ross Perot ran?

Clinton was elected both times with < 50% of the vote. The only other president I can think of with those kinds of popular vote numbers was Woodrow Wilson.
 
Again: I know that.

barfo

So it's not what a libertarian would say. The libertarian didn't say it.

Do I need to put "quotes" somewhere to help you out with this?
 
Clinton was elected both times with < 50% of the vote. The only other president I can think of with those kinds of popular vote numbers was Woodrow Wilson.

Lincoln, Nixon in '68. JQ Adams only got 31%.

All told, there are 18 presidents elected with <50% of the vote. It's not so rare.

Although I guess it is more rare if you meant getting elected twice with <50%. Cleveland, Wilson, Clinton appear to be the only ones to do that.

barfo
 
Lincoln, Nixon in '68. JQ Adams only got 31%.

All told, there are 18 presidents elected with <50% of the vote. It's not so rare.

Although I guess it is more rare if you meant getting elected twice with <50%. Cleveland, Wilson, Clinton appear to be the only ones to do that.

barfo

TWICE, barfo.

Clinton got < 50% TWO times.

Wilson got < 50% TWO times.
 
So it's not what a libertarian would say.

Yes, the libertarian would say "And what is Aleppo?" That has already been established.

The libertarian didn't say it.

Yes, I know that. For the third time.

barfo
 
Yes, the libertarian would say "And what is Aleppo?" That has already been established.



Yes, I know that. For the third time.

barfo

The democrat would say, when do we start bombing?

See how that works?
 
TWICE, barfo.

Clinton got < 50% TWO times.

Wilson got < 50% TWO times.

So did Cleveland, as I pointed out. You forget to put on your reading glasses today?

So did Cleveland, as I pointed out. You forget to put on your reading glasses today?

So did Cleveland, as I pointed out. You forget to put on your reading glasses today?

repeated that 3 times for you as seems to be required today.

barfo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top