Blazinaway
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2010
- Messages
- 11,091
- Likes
- 4,378
- Points
- 113
he's playin so damn well that he may get a significant offer as an RFA, possibly pricing him out of our price range
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he's playin so damn well that he may get a significant offer as an RFA, possibly pricing him out of our price range
We must pay. This could be a first time our team has had a solid pg rotation.
We must pay. This could be a first time our team has had a solid pg rotation.
We must pay. This could be a first time our team has had a solid pg rotation.
so if so someone offers him 6 mil per U suggest we match?
so if so someone offers him 6 mil per U suggest we match?
Let's not get carried away yet.
8.5 PTS
50.0% FG
41.6% 3FG
75% FT
5.2 AST
2.0 TO
is right about a 3.28 MIL player which is his QO. It certainly isn't over a MLE-player at this point.
This is pretty much what I posted in another thread. He's driving the price up, and I think the guy could probably start for at least a third of the teams in the league.
He's an RFA (if we choose to tender him an offer), so he's ours to lose. If we decide to keep him at almost any price, we might be stuck with Hickson because he's the only one we'll be able to go over the cap to sign.
Which just tells us that no GM (...Kahn got fired, right?) would overpay for a Blazer backup PG.
I think he would get around 4 million. It's a good contract. I think maynor should get it if he keeps this up.
I was thinking the same thing. Except for the stuck with Hickson part. I think if Maynor's expected price goes up to a certain point, we may have to make the offer to Hickson, killing the rest of our cap space, to be able to sign and trade him. Even if we didn't trade him this summer, we could still trade him next year. No worries. Olshey's got this.He's an RFA (if we choose to tender him an offer), so he's ours to lose. If we decide to keep him at almost any price, we might be stuck with Hickson because he's the only one we'll be able to go over the cap to sign.

If I was Olshey and I felt like I really had something special in a three-guard rotation with Lillard, Maynor and Matthews, *and* I really liked Hickson's offensive spunk, I'd think about trading LMA, Leonard, Freeland, Babbitt, whoever for a Marc Gasol. Memphis is in a unique position where Z-Bo ain't getting any younger, and they don't really use Marc to his fullest.
If I was Olshey and I felt like I really had something special in a three-guard rotation with Lillard, Maynor and Matthews, *and* I really liked Hickson's offensive spunk, I'd think about trading LMA, Leonard, Freeland, Babbitt, whoever for a Marc Gasol. Memphis is in a unique position where Z-Bo ain't getting any younger, and they don't really use Marc to his fullest.
How are Z-Bo and LMA going to play better together then Hickson and LMA? Really you could say that Hickson has been 90% of Z-Bo this year.

I'm not opposed to trading Aldridge because I think Hickson duplicates a lot of the same skills, with a higher rebounding average and a much higher FG%. I also think Aldridge would bring more in trade.
That's really the crux... if you felt really good about Hickson (and his defensive liabilities) at PF, and knew you'd get a Top-5 center in return for LMA, you trade LMA. Olshey traded Eric Gordon. He's not afraid to shake shit up if the reward is right.
Is JJ Reddick going to be a UFA or RFA this summer?
