The Official "We need to trade someone to get someone better back" Thread

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
NJNetz

NJNetz

BBW Banned
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Messages
14,413
Likes
88
Points
48
The Official "We need to trade someone to get someone better back" Thread

Wright+McInnis+Collins+Jefferson+Moore for Garnett?

Trade ID-3440291.


Post your trade scenerios......realistic ones.
 
how is that realistc, there getting jefferson and nothing much for garnett, they dont need another sg /sf in wright cause they have foye and mccants, davis, and hassel,

it would proabably need to be nenad jefferson cap fillers than like 3 firsts
 
<div class="quote_poster">thedude9990 Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">how is that realistc, there getting jefferson and nothing much for garnett, they dont need another sg /sf in wright cause they have foye and mccants, davis, and hassel,

it would proabably need to be nenad jefferson cap fillers than like 3 firsts</div>

I forgot about Nenad. However I think, they would take Jefferson or Carter if it was offered in the deal.

Do you have any trade ideas?
 
not really, maybe Jefferson and Mciness for Iverson? its obvious we need another scorer to compliment Carter idk maybe even Jermiane Oneal idk
 
<div class="quote_poster">thedude9990 Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">not really, maybe Jefferson and Mciness for Iverson? its obvious we need another scorer to compliment Carter idk maybe even Jermiane Oneal idk</div>

Not thanks, I rather not having Iverson, and it's not like we could get him anyway.


How could I forget O'neal.

Krstic+Jefferson+McInnis for Jermaine?

Seems like we are giving up too much.

Krstic+Jefferson+Collins for Jermaine?

Carter+McInnis for Jermaine?
 
Nenad + Carter + Collins + filler for KG + Ricky Davis

Kidd
Davis
Jefferson
KG
Moore/Cliffy
 
its gunna be vince/jefferson and nenad for like oneil garnett, iverson i tihnk is realistc i dont really mind we need scoring, not to many big names are out there, other than iverson garnett and oneil. maybe Antwan Jamison ??? i wouldnt wanna give up vince/jefferson for him though
 
<div class="quote_poster">Carter Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">What about Krstic + Jefferson for Garnett?</div>

Trade doesn't work. We would need to add fillers.

<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">its gunna be vince/jefferson and nenad for like oneil garnett, iverson i tihnk is realistc i dont really mind we need scoring, not to many big names are out there, other than iverson garnett and oneil. maybe Antwan Jamison ??? i wouldnt wanna give up vince/jefferson for him though</div>

We need a big men, not Jamison. Iverson is gonna be in Philly, and personally I don't want him here. Great guy but not meant for the Nets.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Carter Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Richard Jefferson + 1st round pick for Dwight Howard?</div>


Realistic trades! You really think Orlando would give up Dwight? They would have to be smoking something.
 
ima get bashed but maybe it wouldnt be a bad idea trading a kidd for garnett type deal. williams can ball and maybe giving him garnett vince and jefferson he will improve
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">williams can ball and maybe giving him garnett vince and jefferson he will improve</div>

He has played on great game but he is not an elite point guard. Believe it or not, he still makes those rookie mistakes. I think trading Kidd would be a mistake

And Kidd would raise hell on the Nets. Afterall he has done for them, they ship him for a player he wants to play with. That would be messed up.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Kidd Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Realistic trades! You really think Orlando would give up Dwight? They would have to be smoking something.</div>

Worth a try.
laugh.gif
I'm just posting trades I do in Live or 2k7.
 
Realistically, we would have to give up a lot for Garnett. Maybe Krstic/Jefferson or Krstic/Carter and a couple of draft picks. But it's really a long shot. Trading Kidd would be a bad idea. Williams will be a great player in a few years time. But he can't replace Kidd yet. But I think a trio of Kidd/Garnett/Jefferson would be more successful than a trio of Kidd/Garnett/Carter. I just don't know how the ball will be divided between the two of them. And if either is willing to be the second option. I'd hate to loose Carter, but I think Jefferson won't mind being the 2nd option. But really, a tandem of Kidd, Garnett and Carter would be awesome.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Carter Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Richard Jefferson + 1st round pick for Dwight Howard?</div>

If you add Kidd,3 rd ones,you'd perhaps have a top 4 bid.

Seriously...The Nets have 3 main players. Carter's short contract means teams will see him as a rental. kidd's age and salary mean he's a short future boost to a top 8 team-not suited to the average and below teams. Jefferson is marketable but he is a well rounded guy-not a stunning talent in any one area,a SF,a fairly big contract and not a guy anyonr thinks will get much better than he is. He is not enough to get a superstar or a high upside big man. Kristic is a fairly good player but not high on anyone's wish list. Kristic + Jefferson still won't fetch a major star-more likely a lateral move. Maybe NJ adds some of the misc. bench guys and gets a package that adds some depth,youthful upside,but replaces R Jeff with a somewhat less talented guy.

The big problem is that the REST of the Nets roster is just a bunch of guys that for most teams won't even upgrade the bench. The Warriors have 2 new walk ons-off the scap pile,Roberson and Barnes. Roberson may be our best 3 pt shooter,he could score 10+ as an off the bench guy. Barnes started vs UTah...outscored their whole starting front line-was the games leading scorer.
I doubt we'd swap either for anybody on the Nets Bench except MAYBE Boone.
Not having much bench quality makes it real hard to create a trade for a top player.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Kidd Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Wright+McInnis+Collins+Jefferson+Moore for Garnett?

Trade ID-3440291.


Post your trade scenerios......realistic ones.</div>

As usual, you guys want to trade up your garbage for an elite player. When will the madness end
lol.gif
 
<div class="quote_poster">hollagr8 Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">As usual, you guys want to trade up your garbage for an elite player. When will the madness end
lol.gif
</div>

what do you expect i didnt want to say anything but it is a shitty trade, its pretty much jefferson for garnett
 
thedude9990, you have been talking about trading for Iverson. Any suggestions, now that Iverson has asked for a trade?


I wanna get this thread going again.
 
I would rather not have AI. Him and Vince are two big scorers and I don't think one will wan't to shoot less than the other. Then RJ would wan't some touches and so would Krstic, so I don't think it would work unless we trade Carter for Iverson, or RJ and Krstic for Iverson.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Carter Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">I would rather not have AI. Him and Vince are two big scorers and I don't think one will wan't to shoot less than the other. Then RJ would wan't some touches and so would Krstic, so I don't think it would work unless we trade Carter for Iverson, or RJ and Krstic for Iverson.</div>

We wouldn't get Iverson without trade either VC or RJ.

Of course I don't think Nets will deal for him, but it's fun to make some scenarios.
 
Vince + Marcus Williams + Jeff McInnis + Jason Collins for Iverson + Dalembert + Kevin Ollie

Maybe throw in Antoine Wright for the 76ers?
 
With Iggy and Carney, I don't exactly think the Sixers are looking for another SF. Besides that, while I love AI, he and Carter cannot coexist in an offense that runs smoothly.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Kidd Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Wright+McInnis+Collins+Jefferson+Moore for Garnett?

Trade ID-3440291.


Post your trade scenerios......realistic ones.</div>

lol.gif


So essentially your trading half your team for Garnett? As far as some more realistic scenarios go, I think Rashard Lewis would be a good guy to target. He is a versatile player at 6'10" he can play both forward positions. Another guy they might want to target is guy like Steven Hunter who can give you some solid minutes at the center position. At the end of the day the Nets won't be better until Lawrence Frank settles on a rotation and learns to trust his bench more.

I don't think the Nets will be one of the teams in the running for AI either. Although, they have some young talent in Marcus Williams, Boone, and Wright I don't think they would be able to put together a package that would peak the 76ers interest to the point were they would trade AI to a division rival.
 
<div class="quote_poster">GameFace Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">
lol.gif
So essentially your trading half your team for Garnett?</div>

Well I wouldn't trade Moore anymore. McInnis we don't care about and don't plan to use. Unlike Adams, Wright doesn't contribute as much and he really isn't important to us. Then we have Collins. Enough said.

The only really important player we would give up is RJ.

<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Rashard Lewis would be a good guy to target. He is a versatile player at 6'10" he can play both forward positions.</div>

Lewis a great player, but we need more of an inside presence. Lewis just doesn't seem to fit the profile.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Kidd Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Well I wouldn't trade Moore anymore. McInnis we don't care about and don't plan to use. Unlike Adams, Wright doesn't contribute as much and he really isn't important to us. Then we have Collins. Enough said.

The only really important player we would give up is RJ.</div>

You may feel that way but the point I was actually trying to make is that this trade would put the Wolves way over the leagues max number of 15 players per roster.



<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Lewis a great player, but we need more of an inside presence. Lewis just doesn't seem to fit the profile.</div>

Although, he doesn't normally tend to play a post game, with his size he could provide solid minutes at the power forward position if forced into that role.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">You may feel that way but the point I was actually trying to make is that this trade would put the Wolves way over the leagues max number of 15 players per roster. </div>

Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't realize that. Maybe they can give us some fillers, and that might make the deal work.

<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Although, he doesn't normally tend to play a post game, with his size he could provide solid minutes at the power forward position if forced into that role.</div>

He does but so can RJ. Lewis might be more effective against the bigger PF's, but at the end of the day, I don't think he can matchup against someone like Dwight on defense.
 
We need a rebounder and shot-blocker, and unfortunately, Lewis is neither. How about Jefferson, Wright and Krstic for JO, or Jefferson, Collins and a first-rounder for JO
 
<div class="quote_poster">Kidd Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">He does but so can RJ. Lewis might be more effective against the bigger PF's, but at the end of the day, I don't think he can matchup against someone like Dwight on defense.</div>
The suns played with an undersized PF and undersized center most of the time the last 2 seasons.

Maybe having RJ or Shard @ PF and picking up the pace is what the Nets need?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top