The Osama Bin Laden Conspiracy Theories- you know they're coming.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
EL PRESIDENTE said:
"yay america!"

will that suffice?
Click to expand...

Not if it's not genuine.

You don't have to be happy or proud of the US for finally catching bin Laden. But that is why I am confused. What a great day for Americans, but I understand that part of being American is the right to not be pro-US or to question the gov't in the face of their success.
 
EL PRESIDENTE said:
Apparently not. The competent thing to do would be to take him alive and actually make him accountable. I guess he is more valuable dead than alive, and there is no need for a lengthy process of bringing him to justice when putting a bullet in his head is the "easy thing to do".

"keep our eye on the ball" = ignore what is actually happening and just believe the Government's changing account of what went down?
Click to expand...

I would have liked to have captured him, tied him up, displayed him at Ground Zero and the Pentagon and held a charity event where you could punch him for $10, with all proceeds going to the families of his victims.
 
Waterboarding him would probably be worse for him.
 
EL PRESIDENTE said:
CIA Chief says they're going to release "photos" now.

I think its a bad move and will do nothing to quiet the conspiracy murmurs. Its actually an act of desperation and will be used for propaganda by islamic militants.
Click to expand...

I think it's a great move. We deserve to see that fucker dead. Besides, it sends a nice message of how willing we are to send Jihadists here:

[video=youtube;Rbm6GXllBiw]
 
EL PRESIDENTE said:
"wanted dead or alive" doesn't mean the same thing as "wanted dead". There are either orders to "capture or kill" or "shoot on sight". Apparently this was a "shoot on site" order to assassinate bin laden.

Why do we even put Khalid Shiek Mohammed through a trial. Why not shoot him and say he was "resisting" in prison? This is the same administration who wanted to try KSM..you know..the guy who actually planned 9/11... in a civilian court in Manhattan for fucks sake.
Click to expand...

Do you honestly not understand the difference between "law enforcement" and "military"? Do you not grasp the distinction between the battlefield, and executing a prisoner in cold blood?
 
oldmangrouch said:
Do you honestly not understand the difference between "law enforcement" and "military"? Do you not grasp the distinction between the battlefield, and executing a prisoner in cold blood?
Click to expand...

He was unarmed. From that it is relatively safe to assume that:

1. he was executed in cold blood
or
2. the navy seals failed at capturing him by killing him instead
 
Wheels said:
"I mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy. Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that" -- Martin Luther King, Jr
Click to expand...

misquoted.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/social.media/05/03/quotes.twain.mlk/?hpt=T2

this is the real quote from MLK the first part is made up:


Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.
 
maxiep said:
Of course the order was to kill him. He was more trouble alive in our custody than dead.
Click to expand...

Quite possible. The only reason to take him alive is if you believe he had high value intel - and I as I keep trying to point out to people, that is very unlikely. If you were running a terrorist network, would you share operational secrets with the PR department?

Of course, if they had taken him alive, certain posters here would still find grounds to complain.
 
or you know, hold him accountable for what he did. killing bin laden was the easy way out for him.
 
yeah ep would have captured him, would have been great, we could have had a trial, and maybe convicted him, at which point it would have been appealed, etc.

why didnt we just do it that way i wonder lol
 
3RA1N1AC said:
yeah ep would have captured him, would have been great, we could have had a trial, and maybe convicted him, at which point it would have been appealed, etc.

why didnt we just do it that way i wonder lol
Click to expand...

With Holder as the AG, it wouldn't surprise me.

"let's try him at Ground Zero!"
\
:MARIS61:
 
it baffles me why anyone would think publicly capturing him would be a good idea.
 
3RA1N1AC said:
why
Click to expand...

Because he would be held accountable for his actions instead of merely getting killed instantly. He would rot for years in a jail cell and probably die due to his medical condition. We would "interrogate" him (unless we stopped doing the EFFECTIVE interrogation methods that caught him in the first place) and he would be our prisoner.

However, he would live the rest of his life knowing that he is property of the United States of America.



No pain, no suffering...just a quick death for Bin Laden. He probably had 2-3 minutes of panic. For all the pain he's caused, that is the extent of his pain and suffering.
 
Hey guys, I heard Alex Jones say that Obama took Brandon Roy's knees because he was getting to close to the truth. This "hoax" with Osama was just to divert our attention from the gang of nerds on the internet who were going to upload the truth. Think about it SHEEPLE, Oden's knees, Roy's knees, the Bees knees! David Stern = Obama = Osama! WAKE UP!
 
For Saddam Hussein, for instance, it was satisfying seeing that guy in jailhouse pajamas and in chains knowing he's fucked.

xin_1905022109470832132319.jpg
 
capture would have been his wet dream.

just to make it clear, you are advocating spending millions and millions of taxpayer dollars to house/feed/ give medical care, not to mention court/lawyer fees, transportation/bodyguards/clothing/prayer mats/etc, all the while being a living martyr/hero/god to AQ

instead he is rotting in the ocean, i wonder what he would have rather had

lol
 
EL PRESIDENTE said:
My preference would have been to take him alive. I hope at the least they put quarters in his eyes.
Click to expand...

Seems a lot different than what you said in another thread:

whoever shot bin laden should get to have sex with any woman in america.


yay. I hope Obama fucks his dead body in the ass and puts it on youtube.

We on the right are very happy Osama is dead, despite what you think, no matter who accomplished it.

I think it would decrease his martyr status to put him in sexy lingerie sucking his own penis.

Why did we have to bury this POS according to muslim tradition? wack.

I hope that was just the "company line" and we used him as fish bait on the boat ride home.



Seems like your what you feel about the situation depends on who is saying what in the different threads.
 
3RA1N1AC said:
capture would have been his wet dream.

just to make it clear, you are advocating spending millions and millions of taxpayer dollars to house/feed/ give medical care, not to mention court/lawyer fees, transportation/bodyguards/clothing/prayer mats/etc, all the while being a living martyr/hero/god to AQ
Click to expand...

Yes. He wouldn't be a living martyr. The only way is if they publicly parade him around and give him a megaphone. Was Saddam Hussein a living martyr.

We had a $50 million reward for information leading to him. I think we could afford giving him 3 squares a day.

"BUT WHAT ABOUT THE RULES OF HABEUS CORPUS!"
\
:MARIS61:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top