Cippy91
Habitual Line Stepper
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2014
- Messages
- 9,667
- Likes
- 7,049
- Points
- 113
Somehow it's just so hard for you to believe an olympic athlete has an ass.You can't tell photoshop when you see it?
you have gone full retard
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Somehow it's just so hard for you to believe an olympic athlete has an ass.You can't tell photoshop when you see it?
Yeah bro stop stalking his posts that everybody can see.1st That's not checking that's asking a question.
2nd I wasn't talking to you.
3rd He didn't get offended by my question.
4th stop stalking my posts...
Wrong. Apples to Oranges. One is a Team sport and one is an individual.
Crabbe was an underdog when he was working for that contract. He was paid little, and typically have to work hard at getting the big contract. He has limited skills, so he was an underdog to nail a big contract, but he did. His time as an underdog has long since passed the moment he signed with the 76ers, or whoever it was, that forced us to match. He nailed us to the wall and thus became a target. NOT an underdog.
Sly hasn't liked this post so I don't think he is down. For $50 I'll pay Denny $25 of the money to permanently do it.
Drama about a random athletes ass, yesAs if this thread wasn't pointless enough now we get random drama
I wouldn't mind more drama about hot athletes asses. That picture was a nice touch. Random pics of nice asses in all threads.Drama about a random athletes ass, yes

Sly hasn't liked this post so I don't think he is down. For $50 I'll pay Denny $25 of the money to permanently do it.
I wouldn't mind more drama about hot athletes asses. That picture was a nice touch. Random pics of nice asses in all threads.
That would keep the dudes at work from this site though with no nsfw warnings![]()
Wrong definition. I don't want to stare at you fucks (me includedWhat are you talking about? This forum is chocked full of asses.
) arguing all the time. That individual is a member of the Team sport you are rooting for as an underdog so you are by association rooting for the individual as a underdog too. But since a poster on here with the moniker of the description of the removal of a body part on the female anatomy stated that "Underdogs don't make $19 million a year." That disqualifies the Team sport you are rooting for as a underdog because the OP individual, as well as a few more individuals on the Team sport meet the conditions of the poster with the moniker of the description of the removal of a body part on the female anatomy of what is not a underdog. Therefore the Team sport cannot be rooted for as an underdog until the OP individual and any other individuals have been removed from the Team sport so as to meet the conditions laid out by the poster with the moniker of the description of the removal of a body part on the female anatomy.
http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/how-did-your-monikier-name-come-to-be.291059/page-3That individual is a member of the Team sport you are rooting for as an underdog so you are by association rooting for the individual as a underdog too. But since a poster on here with the moniker of the description of the removal of a body part on the female anatomy stated that "Underdogs don't make $19 million a year." That disqualifies the Team sport you are rooting for as a underdog because the OP individual, as well as a few more individuals on the Team sport meet the conditions of the poster with the moniker of the description of the removal of a body part on the female anatomy of what is not a underdog. Therefore the Team sport cannot be rooted for as an underdog until the OP individual and any other individuals have been removed from the Team sport so as to meet the conditions laid out by the poster with the moniker of the description of the removal of a body part on the female anatomy.
Your assumptions are showing. My username has nothing to do with body parts. Words can have more than one definition. You may want to broaden your vocabulary to include things other than body parts.
boob1
bo͞ob/
informal
noun
BNM
- 1.
NORTH AMERICAN
a foolish or stupid person.
"why was that boob given a key investigation?"- 2.
BRITISH
an embarrassing mistake.
Why do you have to take everything so seriously? It was a gag having to do with not tagging you in a post written to another poster. Damn.
Why don't you generate another part of the human anatomy. It's known as the funny bone.
Why do you take everything so damn seriously. Lighten up Lucy. This is an online form. Nothing said here is worth getting upset about.
BNM
If that's the way you feel then why did you respond in the way you did? Why didn't you take it for what it was, humorous.
The whole post is an attempt to mess with @Orion Bailey.
A funny.
I didn't take your post personally. You took mine personally. Lighten up and learn to laugh at yourself. It makes life so much easier.
BNM
boob is also poop flipped over....could mean bureau of old bastards.....who knows? but we got it from the moniker thread so it's all good....face it though....guys in mom's basement are going for the mammary glands connection...probably bottle fed babiesPosting the various definitions of boob is you not taking it personally?
Okay............
Whatever you say.
Posting the various definitions of boob is you not taking it personally?
Okay............
Whatever you say.
If there's anything I've learned from the fights I've had with my wife because of emails or texts, it's that you shouldn't read too much into the tone of what YOU THINK someone is taking with you.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...-reportedly-unhappy-knicks-paused-trade-talks
Carmelo Anthony Reportedly Unhappy Knicks Paused Trade Talks
He needs to move far away from New York ...sooner the better...he's pissed off his lady beyond fixin'Screw that guy. He has a big contract, a no-trade clause, and isn't good enough to get his team to the playoffs in a weak conference. He can be as unhappy as he wants, but he made his own bed.
No, of course not. It's just a username in an anonymous forum.
Just as you assumed the wrong definition, you assumed I took it personally.
But, you sure took me correcting your first assumption personally. Again, lighten up. It's just an online forum where people talk about their favorite basketball team.
BNM
All I know is he wrote me the riot act about not tagging him in another forum members' post. So I respected his wishes, albeit in a smart ass kind of way, and didn't tag him. Was that a funny haha learn to laugh at myself post he made or was I correct in my 'assumption' of taking what he said seriously?
