The Surprising Story Of 'Thomas Jefferson's Qur'an'

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

SlyPokerDog

Woof!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
127,029
Likes
147,633
Points
115
Thomas Jefferson had a vast personal library reflecting his enormous curiosity about the world. Among his volumes: a Quran purchased in 1765 that informed his ideas about plurality and religious freedom in the founding of America. In her Thomas Jefferson's Qur'an: Islam and the Founders, author Denise Spellberg draws parallels between the beliefs of the founding father and religious tolerance in the United States today.

"I think that there is anxiety about what Muslims believe, largely because people don't understand Islam very well. I think that was also true in the 18th century," Spellberg says. "It strikes me that Jefferson was theorizing for a future that included Muslims — not in spite of their religion, but because of it and because of his notion of universal civil rights."

She sat down with All Things Considered host Arun Rath to discuss Jefferson's Qur'an and the lasting impact of the third U.S. president's views on religious freedom.

On how Jefferson came to have a Quran:

"He actually was a bibliophile from the beginning. He ordered this Quran in 1765, eleven years before he wrote the Declaration of Independence. He was a law student at the time, and he had the book shipped from England to Williamsburg, Va. ... There's an entry in the local newspaper because they were the booksellers for the time.
...

"Europeans, and Americans after them, in this period tended to be quite hostile toward Islam. And yet Jefferson was curious about the religion and law of Muslims, and that's probably why he bought the Quran."

On his views of religious freedom:

"Jefferson was unique in many ways. He criticized Islam as he did Christianity and Judaism. He talked about Islam as a religion that repressed scientific inquiry — a strange idea he got from Voltaire that wasn't right — but ... was able to separate his principles about Muslim religious liberty and civil rights from these inherited European prejudices about Islam.

"He did the same thing when arguing for the inclusion of Catholics and Jews, actually. He had not very good things to say about either Catholicism or Judaism, but he insisted that these individual practitioners should have equal civil rights. ... [Jefferson] resisted the notion, for example, that Catholics were a threat to the United States because of their allegiance to the pope as a foreign power. There were many Protestants who would have disagreed with him about Catholics, and many who would have disagreed with him about Muslims.

"They were the outsiders, whose inclusion represented the furthest reach of toleration and rights. So for Jefferson and others — and he was not alone in this, although it was a minority — for him to include Muslims meant to include everyone of every faith: Jews, Catholics and all others. And to exclude Muslims meant that there would be no universal principle of civil rights for all believers in America."

On the Muslim population in America during the 1770s:

"Jefferson and [George] Washington and others were theorizing about a future American population when, ironically and tragically, they never knew that real Muslims were already in America. But they were slaves, brought from west Africa against their will.

"We don't know how many were the first American Muslims; we think they numbered in the thousands or tens of thousands. And it's not impossible that Jefferson actually owned Muslim slaves from Africa, but there's no direct evidence of it. That's not the case for George Washington, his neighbor in Virginia.

"Washington, among his taxable items ... someone on his plantation listed the names of Fatimer and Little Fatimer. And despite being spelled with an 'er' at the end, this is clearly the name of the prophet's daughter Fatima. So there were Muslim women working on Washington's plantation at the same time he was inviting people of all faiths to a protected religious liberty and rights in the United States."

 
And I own a couple of bibles... you can't always judge the owner by the cover of the books.

barfo
 
I'm curious...which editions/versions?

First edition. Written by God himself.

Actually, let me look, I have no idea...

I'll have to put that question on hold, I am not finding them, which means they must be on the bookshelf in the guestroom, which is occupied at present. Either that or I'm blind. I did find my copy of Mao's little red book, if you are interested it is 2nd edition, 2nd printing, 1974.

barfo
 
I have a later edition of Red book, and his memoirs--both from the last decade or so.

As I said, just curious--I took a class on "the Bible as Literature" once for English credits. The New Jerusalem was used b/c the professor (not a Christian) said it was a more poetic version, and included the Apocrypha. I'd only used New King James, and now use the ESV. I didn't know if you (as a non-believer) had picked a certain edition on purpose, or just had whatever someone had given you/was on sale/etc.
 
I have a later edition of Red book, and his memoirs--both from the last decade or so.

As I said, just curious--I took a class on "the Bible as Literature" once for English credits. The New Jerusalem was used b/c the professor (not a Christian) said it was a more poetic version, and included the Apocrypha. I'd only used New King James, and now use the ESV. I didn't know if you (as a non-believer) had picked a certain edition on purpose, or just had whatever someone had given you/was on sale/etc.

I did not pick a specific version on purpose - I acquired my copies by chance (mine is a home for unloved books) so it was whatever someone else was discarding. Most likely the most common version, whatever that is.

barfo
 
I did not pick a specific version on purpose - I acquired my copies by chance (mine is a home for unloved books) so it was whatever someone else was discarding. Most likely the most common version, whatever that is.

barfo

I would have guessed Gideon from the nightstand of a Motel 6.
 
I would have guessed Gideon from the nightstand of a Motel 6.

The Gideon bibles use Old King James version (think "thees" and "thous" and "shalts") because the copyright is free, and therefore they can print more of them for the same price (and give them away to motels for free).

Not because they're the best translation (they're not) or editorial rendition (they're not) or even their ease of reading (like ABM's favorite: The Message).
 
The Gideon bibles use Old King James version (think "thees" and "thous" and "shalts") because the copyright is free, and therefore they can print more of them for the same price (and give them away to motels for free).

Not because they're the best translation (they're not) or editorial rendition (they're not) or even their ease of reading (like ABM's favorite: The Message).

Let me turn the question around: For a non-believer such as myself, what version do you recommend?

barfo
 
Let me turn the question around: For a non-believer such as myself, what version do you recommend?

barfo

Honestly, if you just wanted to read the stories and get an easy-to-read version, the Message isn't bad at all. It'll give you a flavor of what the Bible and Christianity are about, but it's not for parsing words and delving into doctrine and such. It's "milk", not "meat"--meant to be read, not studied.
Here a sampling (Matthew 5:13-14)
NKJ said:
"You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt has become tasteless, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled under foot by men. You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden;...."
and
The Message said:
"Let me tell you why you are here. You're here to be the salt-seasoning that brings out the God-flavors of this earth. If you lose your saltiness, how will people taste godliness? You've lost your usefulness and will end up in the garbage. Here's another way to put it: you're here to be the light, bringing out the God colors to the world. God is not a secret to be kept. We're going public with this, as public as a city on a hill....

It's basically a one-man translation (so you don't get dissenting or tempering collaborations), but if you're not using it as a doctrinal proof then you're going to be just fine. And it's the quickest read.

New Jerusalem was pretty poetic.
 
God-flavors? Man, that passage is just awful on the ears. I'd much prefer the first one for poetics alone.
 
A professor of American and Islamic history, heh. Well she is entitled to a view, but I wonder why
she has the one she may have.

This phrase is an eye catcher, "inherited European prejudices about Islam". This is an odd point of view for the good professor to take, when you consider that the Islamic world held perhaps 1.5 million European in slavery during the time of Jefferson. Jefferson was unsuccessful in finding any European ally that had the ability or knew of anyway to deal with the Islamic world in North Africa.
The were call Barbary Pirates at the time and they were taking American ships as well as European.

Jefferson's response was go to war with them and thus we have United States Marine Corp complete with anthem which includes the phrase "To the Shores of Tripoli". This was also the beginnings of the US Navy with the order to build six Frigates including the USS Constitution,
Later to become known as "Old Ironsides". She is still in commission, birthed in Boston harbor.

I just finish a recently written book on Jefferson, "The Art of Power". He was indeed all for being inclusive of all followers of any religion but I don't think that came from any special consideration given to Islam nor did he over come any European prejudices, he had his own he developed while dealing with the North African Isamic world on behalf of the US and Europe.
 
A professor of American and Islamic history, heh. Well she is entitled to a view, but I wonder why
she has the one she may have.

This phrase is an eye catcher, "inherited European prejudices about Islam". This is an odd point of view for the good professor to take, when you consider that the Islamic world held perhaps 1.5 million European in slavery during the time of Jefferson. Jefferson was unsuccessful in finding any European ally that had the ability or knew of anyway to deal with the Islamic world in North Africa.
The were call Barbary Pirates at the time and they were taking American ships as well as European.

Jefferson's response was go to war with them and thus we have United States Marine Corp complete with anthem which includes the phrase "To the Shores of Tripoli". This was also the beginnings of the US Navy with the order to build six Frigates including the USS Constitution,
Later to become known as "Old Ironsides". She is still in commission, birthed in Boston harbor.

I just finish a recently written book on Jefferson, "The Art of Power". He was indeed all for being inclusive of all followers of any religion but I don't think that came from any special consideration given to Islam nor did he over come any European prejudices, he had his own he developed while dealing with the North African Isamic world on behalf of the US and Europe.

It seems to me that if Jefferson ordered a Qur'an in which to study, he may have had the inclination that there was more to the Islamic world that the pirates he was at war with. A lesson that a lot of Americans could take to heart today.
 
It seems to me that if Jefferson ordered a Qur'an in which to study, he may have had the inclination that there was more to the Islamic world that the pirates he was at war with. A lesson that a lot of Americans could take to heart today.

Yes, I recommend everyone read the Quran. It is very enlightening to find out what you can expect, as a non believer, of the Muslim. If you have a copy on your computer, like I do, you can search for Infidel and find many ways to be treated that most men would hope never will happen to them. Jefferson became a very inclusive minded man and perhaps he did get some of that from the Quran as an example of extreme non inclusiveness.

But I think you give way too much significance to Jefferson's Quran and the fact that he ordered it at age 22, 11 years before he wrote the Declaration of Independence and about 35 years prior to his going to war with the Islamic pirates
 
Last edited:
Let me turn the question around: For a non-believer such as myself, what version do you recommend?

barfo

0718699_1_ftc_dp.jpg
 
Yes, I recommend everyone read the Quran. It is very enlightening to find out what you can expect, as a non believer, of the Muslim. If you have a copy on your computer, like I do, you can search for Infidel and find many ways to be treated that most men would hope never will happen to them. Jefferson became a very inclusive minded man and perhaps he did get some of that from the Quran as an example of extreme non inclusiveness.

I know, when I was in North Africa, I was killed and/or enslaved every day for not being a Muslim!

But I think you give way too much significance to Jefferson's Quran and the fact that he ordered it at age 22, 11 years before he wrote the Declaration of Independence and about 35 years prior to his going to war with the Islamic pirates

Perhaps. Perhaps you give way too much significance to the religion of the pirates that Jefferson went to war with.
 
Do we know if Jefferson's birth-certificate is authentic?
 
Do we know if Jefferson's birth-certificate is authentic?

People alive at the time of the acceptance of the Constitution were exempted from the requirement to be a Natural Born Citizen to qualify for President.
 
Last edited:
I know, when I was in North Africa, I was killed and/or enslaved every day for not being a Muslim!



Perhaps. Perhaps you give way too much significance to the religion of the pirates that Jefferson went to war with.
Perhaps although it seem they are the cause of most of our trouble today. All the guys involved with bringing down the world trade center were followers of Islam.
Weird how even today , Tripoli, Benghazi are still relevant. Who else issues anything like a Fatwa declaring Holy war on us infidels of America?
 
Perhaps although it seem they are the cause of most of our trouble today. All the guys involved with bringing down the world trade center were followers of Islam.
Weird how even today , Tripoli, Benghazi are still relevant. Who else issues anything like a Fatwa declaring Holy war on us infidels of America?

Crazy people. Crazy people who happen to be Muslim.
 
yeah, man. Means nothing that almost every conflict in the world today is inspired by the fanatics that practice this religion...

Everyone knows Christianity never caused any conflicts.. Right guys??

Sent from my banana using Tapatalk 4
 
Everyone knows Christianity never caused any conflicts.. Right guys??

Sent from my banana using Tapatalk 4

Let see, it has been about a thousand years since a Pope lead an army against anyone. Can you point out any Christian lead war that has occurred since any known Jihad?
 
Interesting story, Sly. The Quran is on my list of books to read, due to its obvious historical/culture influence.

My bible is the King James. Frankly, I found much of it rather dull reading.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top